620 likes | 775 Views
Thermal Analysis of a Radiation Shield for Antimatter Rocketry Concepts Jon Webb Embry Riddle Aeronautical University. Agenda. Why Hyperion Rocket Principles Why antimatter Velocity Profile and Fundamentals Thermal Considerations. Why fly so fast in space?. Space flight takes to long!.
E N D
Thermal Analysis of a Radiation Shield for Antimatter Rocketry ConceptsJon WebbEmbry Riddle Aeronautical University HYPERION ERAU
Agenda • Why Hyperion • Rocket Principles • Why antimatter • Velocity Profile and Fundamentals • Thermal Considerations HYPERION ERAU
Why fly so fast in space? Space flight takes to long! HYPERION ERAU
Microgravity Environment Skeletal and Muscular atrophy can make it impossible to return to the surface of Earth! HYPERION ERAU
Cosmic Radiation Radiation in space is lethal!! HYPERION ERAU
Rocket Principles • Specific Impulse is the fuel efficiency of a rocket engine • As fuel energy density increases so does Specific Impulse and delta V • The equation for Specific Impulse is: HYPERION ERAU
Rocket Principles • Thrust is a force • Thrust is the time rate change of propellant momentum • Momentum is the mass of fuel ejected multiplied by the exhaust velocity HYPERION ERAU
Chemical Rocketry • LO/LH2 HYPERION ERAU
Fuel Energy Density HYPERION ERAU
What is antimatter (positrons) • Produces photons isotropically • Produces photons back to back • 0.511 MeV per photon HYPERION ERAU
How do we propel a S/C HYPERION ERAU
Shield Design (Rad. Lengths) HYPERION ERAU
Shield Design • Made of Tungsten • Melting point of 3600 K • Density of 19.3 gm/cm3 • Radiation length is 0.35 cm • 5 radiation lengths thick • Roughly 1.75 cm thick HYPERION ERAU
Shield Design (Dimension) HYPERION ERAU
Shield Design (Mass) HYPERION ERAU
Momentum Attenuation electron • Compton Scattering • Brehmstralling • Photo-electric Effect • photons/electrons ejected at random angles • Might reduce momentum/cosine average • Monte-Carlo analysis is being developed to research effects Atom HYPERION ERAU
Thermal Problem • Energy is lost as heat in the tungsten shield • We must find a way to dissipate the heat in order to augment the thrust • We must find a way to regain the energy lost from the heat to augment efficiency (Isp) HYPERION ERAU
Shield Thermal Loading HYPERION ERAU
Radiative Cooling • For highest Isp we must find the steady state condition where blackbody radiation equals input energy. • This will severely limit the thrust Eradiated E thermal , P thrust HYPERION ERAU
Radiative Cooling • View Factors must be examined • The extreme limits of the pi/2 to –pi/2 shield may re-radiate energy into the other side of the shield. HYPERION ERAU
Radiative Cooling • We may want to consider making the shield flat and very large, or decrease the angular limits of the shield. • Annihilate e+ inside shield HYPERION ERAU
Radiative Cooling R R AP D All Values in Radians HYPERION ERAU
Radiative Cooling HYPERION ERAU
Radiative Cooling HYPERION ERAU
Radiative Cooling HYPERION ERAU
Radiative Cooling 1. 7. 2. 3. 8. 4. 5. 6. HYPERION ERAU
Radiative Cooling HYPERION ERAU
Radiative Thrust HYPERION ERAU
Convective Cooling • Use liquid Hydrogen or Ammonia to absorb excess heat • Allow fluid to expand across the shield to produce thrust with a decreased Isp HYPERION ERAU
Convective Cooling LH2 Properties • Cp = 10,000 J/ (kg.K) • h = 210 W/(m2.K) • TLH2 = 16 K • Tshld = 3300 K HYPERION ERAU
Convective Power Transfer 1. 2. HYPERION ERAU
LH2 Mass Flow Rate 3. 4. 5. HYPERION ERAU
LH2 Mass Flow Rate HYPERION ERAU
Convective Thrust from LH2 6. 7. 9. 10. HYPERION ERAU
Convective Thrust from LH2 HYPERION ERAU
Shield Thrust to Weight Ratio HYPERION ERAU
Convective Specific Impulse 11. 12. 13. 14. HYPERION ERAU
Specific Impulse vs. Shield Temp. HYPERION ERAU
Thrust Augmentation • Shield Mass: 170 Mt • 10 Shields • Shield Area: 10,000m2 • Thrust: 1.70 MN • Isp: 826 seconds 10 sub-shields 5 rad. lengths HYPERION ERAU
Convective Case Study 1 • MS/C = 40 Mt • F = 1.70 MN • A = 10,000 m2 • P = 6,896 MW • Msh = 170 Mt • Md = 210 Mt • Mdote+ = 7.662 x 10-8 kg/s • MdotH2 = 210 kg/s HYPERION ERAU
Convective Case Study 1 HYPERION ERAU
Convective Case Study 1 HYPERION ERAU
Convective Case Study 2 • MS/C = 40 Mt • F = 261.9 kN • A = 1130.4 m2 • P = 780 MW • Msh = 19.2 Mt • Md = 66.113 Mt • Mdote+ = 4.33 x 10-9 kg/s • MdotH2 = 23.7 kg/s HYPERION ERAU
Convective Case Study 2 HYPERION ERAU
Convective Case Study 2 HYPERION ERAU
Convective Case Study HYPERION ERAU
Further Convective Work • Combine case studies into 3-D graphs (dV vs. IMLEO/H2/e+ mass vs. shield mass/radius/area) • Research energy/heat deposition as a function of thickness plus H2 gaps • Increase SA without increasing mass HYPERION ERAU
Electrical Power Production • Another option is to use a working fluid that can be expanded through a turbine to produce electricity • This would allow for low thrust missions and provide the spacecraft with electricity for its subcomponents HYPERION ERAU
Tri-Modal Operation • Lastly the engine could be cooled with LH2 when large thrust is needed and operate in a radiative mode to slowly accelerate S/C in interplanetary space. • When the engine is in a radiative mode, electricity can be produced HYPERION ERAU
Concluding Remarks • Antimatter offers extraordinary propulsion capabilities • Unfortunately thermal challenges are quite daunting • Production and storage are a whole different challenge HYPERION ERAU