280 likes | 380 Views
Content Objective: - Participants will be able to distinguish between facts and myths of language acquisition. Language Objective: -Participants will be able to empathize with the stilted language of language learners. Myths and Misconceptions about Second Language Learning.
E N D
Content Objective:- Participants will be able to distinguish between facts and myths of language acquisition Language Objective: -Participants will be able to empathize with the stilted language of language learners
Myths and Misconceptions about Second Language Learning INTERDISCIPLINARY COLLABORATIVE PROJECT Workshop 2003 Mariche García-Bayonas Modified by Angie & Robina
Introduction • Teachers face the challenge of instructing children who have limited skills in English • This is a widespread phenomenon in the USA • Second language learning can be a frustrating and difficult experience
1: children learn second languages quickly and easily • Adolescents and adults perform better than young children under controlled conditions (except pronunciation) • Children’s constructions are shorter and simpler, with a smaller vocabulary, but they in fact do not learn quicker or easier than adults
1: children learn second languages quickly and easily • Children are not faster learners but in the long run they usually outperform adults • Teachers should not expect children who are learning English fast results. It’s a difficult process for them too • Children also have inhibitions and frustrations
2: The younger the child, the more skilled in acquiring an L2 False
2: The younger the child, the more skilled in acquiring a L2 • On formal grammatical analysis, older children are more skilled in dealing with instructional approaches • Young children do not have an advantage over older children • Language minority children need to master English as quickly as possible while at the same time learning subject-matter content.
2: The younger the child, the more skilled in acquiring a L2 • Because L2 acquisition takes time, children will continue to need the support of their L1 not to fall behind in content-area learning
3: Children learn more quickly if exposed to the context more False
3: Children learn more quickly if exposed to the context more • Being in a an environment where constantly exposed to English is for many the best solution: but this is not the case • Children in bilingual classes have been found to learn as much as those in English-only programs • Oral communication skills in L2 may be acquired in 2-3 years
3: Children learn more quickly if exposed to the context more • It may take up to 6 years to acquire the necessary level for instruction • Letting them use their L1 is not a disservice • Using their L1 prevents them from falling behind in school work • Children do benefit from extended intensive exposure to the L2
4: If children can speak an L2, they have acquired it • There is much more than learning how to speak it • Achieving proficiency in the abstract academic language involves much more • Exiting children who are not ready for the all-English classroom may be harmful to the child’s academic success
4: If children can speak an L2, they have acquired it • Some children are outgoing and talk much, others are shy and spend much time listening • Both will learn at the same pace • Cultural and individual differences may mean different cognitive and social norms • Effective instruction is varied: small group work, cooperative learning, peer tutoring, individualized instruction, etc
4: If children can speak an L2, they have acquired it • Children may be more responsive to teachers who are sensitive to their culture and behavioral patterns • This means going BEYOND history lessons, slide shows (who do not reach children effectively)
Where do we go from here? • The “problem” of cultural and linguistic diversity is not a problem • It is an “opportunity”. It enriches the schools and the other students • Teachers need to be aware of these research findings and unlearn old ways of thinking
Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol By Robina & Angie Model Elementary 2003
Content Objectives: Participants will understand 3 different components of the SIOP model: adapting content, scaffolding and practice. Language Objective Participants will share some strategies that are already in use and some strategies that they could implement in their own classrooms Presentation
Strategies • Turn to a partner and discuss two strategies that you use to facilitate learning in your classroom.
Adapting Content • Look at the books in the middle of your table. • As a group, decide on characteristics that make certain books more user-friendly. • Also discuss characteristics that make some books more difficult to understand.
Scaffolding • First lesson: As Angie teaches, think of what makes her lesson difficult to understand • Second lesson: What strategies are implemented to make this lesson more user friendly?
Jigsaw Cooperative Learning • With your grade level, read the highlighted passage in your packet. • Be prepared to share: • Two strategies you already use • One strategy you learned
State Standards • As a grade level, choose one content area standard and: • Refer to the SIOP checklist to see what new strategy you can incorporate • Brainstorm ways to teach this standard using two sheltered principles
Conclusion • Conversational language is different from academic language • Sheltered Instruction is vital for ESL students to be successful in school • The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol benefits all students