1 / 13

Understanding Business Strategy Concepts & Cases

Learn about the different types of strategic alliances, including equity and nonequity alliances, and their impact on firms. Explore how alliances can help firms grow and compete effectively in the market. Understand the key strategies for creating and maintaining successful alliances, including managing risks, developing trust, and analyzing alliance performance. Discover the importance of trust, cultural awareness, and effective leadership in alliance management.

randyashley
Download Presentation

Understanding Business Strategy Concepts & Cases

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Understanding Business StrategyConcepts & Cases Part 3: Strategy Chapter 9: Creating and Maintaining Alliances

  2. Chapter 9: Creating and Maintaining Alliances • A strategic alliance is a type of cooperative strategy the purpose of which is to develop a competitive advantage • Equity alliances, e.g. joint venture • Nonequity alliances

  3. Developing Strategic Alliances • A very popular strategy • Help firms grow and have a major impact on partner firms • What reasons can you think of that would cause firms to form alliances?

  4. Business-Level Strategic Alliances • Vertical strategic alliances • Relationship between buyers and suppliers • Produce products • Most effective when trust exists between partners • Trust sustains transfer of technological knowledge • May manage supply chain rather than pricing strategy

  5. Business-Level Strategic Alliances • Horizontal strategic alliances • Enhance the capabilities of the partners to compete in their markets • A response to competitor’s actions • A response to substantial uncertainty • Requires a smaller investment of capital • Explicit collusion v. tacit collusion • Most difficult to manage and sustain because partners are also competitors

  6. Corporate-Level Strategic Alliances • Diversification by alliance • E.g. China’s SAIC Motorcorp & Nanjing Automobile Corp. • Synergy by alliance • E.g. Coca-Cola and Cargill • Franchising • E.g. MacDonald’s

  7. International Strategic Alliance • Some countries require that firms form joint ventures with local firms in order to enter their markets • Foreign firms need knowledge and perhaps other resources to understand and compete effectively in the newly entered markets

  8. International Strategic Alliance • Different cultures and a lack of trust can hinder the transfer of knowledge or sharing of other resources necessary to make an alliance successful

  9. Managing Risk • Development of trust • Educating about cultural differences • Refusing to assume about partner’s competencies • Using contracts to guard against opportunistic behavior • E.g. Disney and Pixar

  10. Managing Strategic Alliances

  11. Managing Strategic Alliances • 1. Even if the firm has a unit with the overall responsibility of managing its network of alliances, a manager or sponsor should be named for each alliance (and a similar person should be named by the partner). These managers keep each other informed of major alliance activities, resource allocations, and outcomes. • 2. The organization should analyze the alliance’s priority within its resource allocations and ensure the commitment needed for each alliance to succeed.

  12. Managing Strategic Alliances • 3. A clear plan for implementing the alliance should be created and activated after the partners have agreed to the alliance. • 4. The means for analyzing the performance of the alliance and distribution of performance outcomes to the partners should be clearly established. • 5. In the evaluation of an alliance’s value, the partners’ partners in other alliances should be considered.

More Related