170 likes | 279 Views
DALHM D evelopment and A nalysis of L eft H anded M aterials. FORTH, Crete, Greece Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey Imperial College, London, England. 2nd year Meeting July 29-30, 2004 Crete, Greece. In the DALHM project
E N D
DALHM Development and Analysis of Left Handed Materials FORTH, Crete, Greece Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey Imperial College, London, England 2nd year Meeting July 29-30, 2004 Crete, Greece
In the DALHM project we have three scientific work packages and an extra one (WP4). WP1 deals with the modeling and characterization of LHMs WP2 deals with design, fabrication, creation, assessment, and test of LH structures WP3will try to identify several applications where the LHM technology can bring revolutionary changes WP4 dealing with the project management and the dissemination of the results
Milestonesand expected results for WP1 Milestones: M1.1 (T0+12) Modeling of LHM structures M1.2 (T0+12) Physical characterization of 1D LHM structures M1.3 (T0+24) Losses of LHMs measured and understood. Inversion of the S-matrix M1.4 (T0+30) 3D LHM building blocks modeled Expected results: -A better understanding of the physics of LH materials -Improvement of the existing tools for modeling and simulating more complicated structures -Limits in the losses of LHMs understood -Design of new LHMs -Derivation of eeffand meff from reflectance and transmittance data
Milestonesand expected results for WP2 M2.1 (T0+12) Fabrication of 1D LH structures M2.2 (T0+18) Fabrication of 2D LH structures M2.3 (T0+18) Transmittance and reflectance measurements M2.4 (T0+24) Beta version of 3D LH structures M2.5 (T0+30) Testing of 3D LH structures Milestonesand expected results for WP3 M3.1 (T0+12) Modeling and characterization of LHM antenna M3.2 (T0+24) First results on high gain antennas and mirrors M3.3 (T0+30) First results on RF lenses and matching of the free space impedance Expected results: Better understanding of the new functionalities of LHMs, and their limitations
Deliverables of WP1 (FORTH, BILKENT, ICSTM1) D1 (T0+6) Progress report D2 (T0+6) Assessment of the consortium modelling tools D4 (T0+12) Progress report D5 (T0+12) Report on the properties of basic test structures D7 (T0+18) Progress report D9 (T0+24) Progress report D11 (T0+24) Theoretical study of the extension of the LH behavior towards optical frequencies D12 (T0+30) Progress report D13 (T0+30) Toolbox for LHM modeling and its validation by measurements D14 (T0+36) Progress report D18 (T0+36) Report on the assessment of the extension of LHMs to optical frequencies
Deliverables of WP2 (FORTH, BILKENT, ICSTM2) D1 (T0+6) Progress report D4 (T0+12) Progress report D6 (T0+12) First 1D LH test structures (FORTH, BILKENT) D7 (T0+18) Progress report D8 (T0+18) First 2D LH test structures (FORTH, BILKENT) D9 (T0+24) Progress report D10 (T0+24) Testing of LH structures and comparison between theory and experiments (BILKENT, FORTH, ICSTM2) D12 (T0+30) Progress report D14 (T0+36) Progress report D18 (T0+36) Report on the assessment of the extension of LHMs to optical frequencies
Deliverables of WP3 (BILKENT, FORTH, ICSTM2) D4 (T0+12) Progress report D7 (T0+18) Progress report D9 (T0+24) Progress report D12 (T0+30) Progress report D14 (T0+36) Progress report D15 (T0+36) Development of tunable LH structures D16 (T0+36) Integrated LH based demonstrators D17 (T0+36) Report on limitations of LHM technology
Deliverables of WP4 (FORTH, BILKENT, ICSTM1,2) D3 (T0+6) Web-page creation (FORTH) D16 (T0+36) Progress report Also reports as defined in the deliverable list, which will include parts concerning reference to the outside state-of-the art on LHMs and to results on the dissemination of the project outcomes. Objectives a) DALHM consortium management b) Ensure that results from DALHM are well disseminated throughout the EU, and also that a good knowledge of outside state-of-the-art exists and is taken into account within DALHM. Ensure that the DALHM results are used by the partners and explore the utilization of the DALHM results by other EU industries whenever possible.
Deliverables for month 24 : D9: Progress report D10: Testing of LH structures and comparison between theoretical results and experimental data D11: Theoretical study of the extension of the LH behavior towards optical frequencies Deliverables for month 30 : D12: Progress report D13: Toolbox for LHM modeling and its validation by measurements
Milestones for the first year : M1.1: Modeling of LHM structures M1.2: Physical characterization of 1D LHM structures M2.1: Fabrication of 1D LH structures M3.1: Modeling and characterization of LHM antenna Milestones for the second year: M2.2 (T0+18) Fabrication of 2D LH structures M2.3 (T0+18) Transmittance and reflectance measurements M1.3 (T0+24) Losses of LHMs measured and understood. Inversion of the S-matrix M2.4 (T0+24) Beta version of 3D structures M3.2 (T0+24) First results of high gain antennas and mirrors Milestones for the third year: M1.4 (T0+30)3D LHM building blocks modeled M2.5 (T0+30)Testing of 3D LH structures M3.3 (T0+30)First results on RF lenses and matching of the free space impedance.
Summary conclusions / recommendations A closer cooperation between the demonstrator part on medical imaging and the theoretical simulations is recommended. (Mike and Maria) Compare the different numerical modeling tools with respect to dispersive media (one test structure for all tools with error analysis). (Thomas, Maria, Soukoulis) Clarify the effect of the small gap (capacitor) in split ring resonators compared to closed ring used in current numerical simulations. (Thomas, ENE. CMS) The issue of absorption by the substrate and the metals (different type) should be addressed. What is the contribution of free carriers in the 10, 35 100 GHz range ? (Ekmel, Maria, CMS) Try to analyze theoretically as well as experimentally alignment errors when stacking tens of slit-ring layers.(Koray, Nikos,Raluca) Parallel &Perp. Compare phase measurements with theory and try to interpret them. (Ekmel, CMS)
Summary conclusions / recommendations Try to understand the effect of the thickness of a photonic crystal with negative refraction on the lensing and the imaging properties. (Kaan, CMS) Try to develop together with theory designs (symmetry, filling factor) which are more suitable for the fabrication of 2D and 3D LHM. (Thomas, Maria, CMS) Develop further the new ideas towards applications while considering what is experimentally feasible. (Mike, Ekmel, ENE. CMS) Clarify resolution of swiss rolls in MRI machine together with theory. (Mike) The work on the tapered solenoid concentrator looks like a promising application and should be continued. (Mike)
Action Items: Summarize all the theoretical results (Transfer matrix, Microwave Studio, FDTD, Inversion etc) (Kafesaki, Koschny, Penciu, Tamara, Economou, Soukoulis) Comparison with experimental results (SRR (open & close), wires, SRR (open & close) +wires. (Katsarakis, Ozbay) Experimental fabrication and measurements (1D and 2D) Circular SRRs and LHMs (Ozbay) Rectangular SRRs and LHMs (Katsarakis) High frequencies (30 GHz, 100 GHz and THz region). Fabrication (Konstandinides &Ozbay) Measurement of the 30 GHz sample along the perpendicular direction (Katsarakis). Ozbay will measure the 100 GHz sample along the perpendicular direction.
To do list: Report due September 3, 2004 Answer the questions of the reviewers. Write your progress report (D9) as per WP. M3.2 (T0+24) First results of high gain antennas and mirrors (Ozbay) M1.3 (T0+24) Losses of LHMs measured and understood. Inversion of the S-matrix (Ozbay, Nikos, Maria) M2.4 (T0+24) Beta version of 3D structures (CMS) 2) Deliverables: D10: Testing of LH structures and comparison between theoretical results and experimental data D11: Theoretical study of the extension of the LH behavior towards optical frequencies 3) Phase and Wedge measurements. Do they give the same n? (Ozbay, Crete) 4) Ozbay to send to Raluca the dimensions of 2d LHM., so she can do the retrieval and T. 5) Both in 1d and 2d LHM do emission measurements.(Ozbay) 6) Negative refraction and focusing in 1d and 2d LHM (Ozbay) 7) Try to introduce ferroelectric in the gaps of the SRR for tunable purposes. (Ozbay) 8) Fabricate and measure the LHM structure at 100 GHz (Ozbay) 9) Try to introduce magnetic ferrires in the SRR to lower the resonance frequency (Nikos) 10) In the 2d LHM structures, do thinner structures (Nikos) 11) Comparison between theory and experiment for the 6 THz structure (Nikos, Crete theory) 12) Write a long paper summarizing all the experiments and theory for Crete (Nikos, Crete theory) 13) Think about applications (Mike, Pendry, Ekmel, CMS, ENE)