270 likes | 601 Views
What Is Interactivity?. IntuitiveUnderdefined conceptLittle consensus on meaningBUT emerging in communication studies. Example 1. A politician had been interviewed by a local newspaper editor through a face-to-face conversation on some social issuesIs this an interactive conversation?. Example 2.
E N D
1. InteractivityFrom New Media To Communication Sheizaf Rafaeli
Presented by Joyce Kong
2. What Is Interactivity? Intuitive
Underdefined concept
Little consensus on meaning
BUT emerging in communication studies
3. Example 1 A politician had been interviewed by a local newspaper editor through a face-to-face conversation on some social issues
Is this an interactive conversation?
4. Example 2 During a political election, the candidate gave his speech to the audience and followed by a Q&A section with the press…
Is this an interactive event?
5. Purpose of This Chapter Contribute to the construct validation of interactivity as a variable through theoretical explication
6. Definition of Interactivity An expression of the extent that in a given series of communication exchanges, any third (or later) transmission (or message) is related to the degree to which previous exchanges referred to even earlier transmissions.
7. Trends of Study in New Communication Technologies
8. Helical Model of Communication (Dance, 1967): metaphor of human communication is both circular & progressive
Communication and media arrangements could not be aligned & compared Reviews on Social Interaction Studies
9. Interaction Process Analysis (Bales, 1950) & Interaction Zones Theory (Hall, 1966): studying groups of people engaged in communicating
Interaction is only treated as “There” or “Not There” phenomenon Reviews on Social Interaction Studies
10. Formal theory of interaction in social groups (Simon, 1952): considering the variability & temporal functions of interaction among people
Interaction ritual (Goffman, 1967): different patterns of interactions varying sequences of acts
Interaction is the key focus instead of communication Reviews on Social Interaction Studies
11. Concepts from New Technologies Animistic & surprising humanlike machines (Frazer, 1922; Mumford, 1934, Shneiderman, 1987; Turkle, 1984)
More dimensions go beyond including bidirectionality, quick response, …, social presence & artificial intelligence
Distinctions between passive & active, reactive & interactive, interaction & friendliness
12. Classifying media by their interactivity (Lippman, 1985; Durlak, 1986 & Heeter, 1985)
No explanation, prediction or testable propositions Classificatory Explications
13. Depends on issue of responsiveness
Requires sender & receiver roles to be interchangeable with each subsequent message
Varies from interactive, quasi-interactive (reactive) and non-interactive (two-way) communication
Interactivity Defined by Rafaeli
14. Two-Way (Non-interactive) The person (P) and other (O) are engaged in communication
The messages (M) are numbered by temporal sequence (Mj)
Creation of messages is independent of history
15. Reactive (Quasi-interactive) Creation of messages based on a previous message – signed as P(Mj) or O(Mj)
16. Fully Interactive Creation of messages based on the way previous messages relate to even earlier messages – expressed as P(Mj/Mj-1) or O(Mj/Mj-1)
17. Example 3 Chief Executive Election Debate held on 15 Mar 07 broadcasted by 8 media channels in HK showed the process of questioning by the press, replied by Donald Tsang & Alan Leong and followed up specifically by these 2 candidates after the speech of the other
=> Interactive Communication
18. Four Highlights of Interactivity Non-interactive communication may contain responses
Interactivity is not a medium characteristic
Much use of new communication technologies is non-interactive
Feedback is just a subset of interactivity
19. Empirical Findings on Interactivity Obvious Correlations
Acceptance & Satisfaction
Preference depends on the role of users affecting the contents
Supported by studies like Becker, Dunwoody, & Rafaeli (1983) wit public interest in the interactive potential of cable television
20. Empirical Findings on Interactivity Less Obvious Correlations
Greater recall rate from high school students (Schaffer & Hannafin, 1986)
Improved learning although interactivity may take longer time (Schaffer & Hannafin, 1986)
Preference on solicited interaction than given interaction by computer (Chaffee, Lieberman & Rafaeli, 1986)
21. Empirical Findings on Interactivity Least Obvious Correlations
Broaden horizons or changes ways of thinking
Improvement in problem-solving abilities (Salomon & Perkins, 1986)
Foster atmosphere of increased cooperation supported by Dilemma experiment (Rafaeli, 1987)
22. Shortcomings of Interactivity High set up costs
Longer communication process
Unwanted predictability on human studies
Hard to determine the right timing of discussion
23. Types of Interest for Future Work Specification
Not limiting comparison with “face-to-face” communication
Rather focus on functions of interactivity
Empirical
Hard to measure
Role of research to expose its complexity & decompose its components
24. Types of Interest for Future Work Theoretical
Mediated-but-not-mass communication
Intellectual interest like what’s going on
Subjective or objective
Pragmatic questions
What is the role of interactivity in the diffusion of media?
25. End of PresentationThank you