130 likes | 198 Views
Nine Antitrust Developments You Should Know About Today. Independent Ink, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc, 396 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2005). Patent holder requires purchase of non-patented product as prerequisite to purchasing patented product in its licensing agreement with buyers
E N D
Nine Antitrust Developments You Should Know About Today
Independent Ink, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc, 396 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2005) • Patent holder requires purchase of non-patented product as prerequisite to purchasing patented product in its licensing agreement with buyers • Federal Circuit (reversing district court) rules that the plaintiff did not need to prove market power in the relevant market as part of its tying claim • Market power is presumed based solely on the existence of the patent on the tying product and the market is defined by the patent
U.S. v. Dentsply, 3rd Circuit 2005 • 75-85% of denture market • Need dealers to compete • Dentsply refused to open its dealer network to competitors • At-will relationship • Circuit reverses and orders a Section 2 injunction
Supplier-Customer Preferences “Bundled” discounts after LePages v. 3M • LePages: above-cost, multi-product “bundled” discounts can violate Section 2 • Little practical impact to date The Newest Frontier? • Cases attacking discounts, rebates & advertising allowances • Category management strategies
Evanston Northwestern Healthcare Corp. and ENH Medical Group, Inc., FTC Docket No. 9315 • FTC challenges acquisition of one hospital by hospitals in a similar product and same geographic market • Pricing policies for hospital services • Price fixing for physician services • FTC seeks to divest the acquired hospital • FTC seeks an elaborate consent decree regulating ENH’s negotiating tactics into the future • Consent decree entered prohibiting ENH’s negotiating on behalf of physicians
HSR Rule Changes HSR Act now applies to many more deals involving partnerships & LLCs, which are treated more like corporations (1) reporting point moved from 100% to “control” • right to 50% of assets • right to 50% of profits upon dissolution • (2) transaction value based on acquisition price or fair market value of interests • instead of underlying assets
HSR Rule Changes Good News . . . • More exemptions will apply to voting security acquisitions • Expansion of intra-person exemption • Exemption for financing vehicles . . .and don’t forget . . . Increase in filing thresholds . . . • $50 million is now $53.1 million
Union Oil Co. of Cal., FTC Docket No. 9305 (July 7, 2004) • The effects of deceptive conduct in a state regulatory proceeding on a related patent • Unocal suggested a path for the CARB on standards for low emission fuels • At the same time that it petitioned the CARB, and unbeknownst to anyone else in the process, Unocal was seeking patents on the very path suggested • When the patents issued, Unocal demanded royalty payments from others who adopted the path
Bankruptcy Creditors • General rule is creditors can cooperate – Sharon Steel (2nd Cir. 1982) • Complaint re United Airlines airplane lessors • Can continuing creditors cooperate? • If so, when? • Relevant market?
Antitrust Modernization Commission • Created to examine the U.S. antitrust laws, identify whether “modernization” is necessary and “solicit views of all parties concerned with the operation of the antitrust laws” • 12 members • Public hearings to begin Summer 2005 • Report expected April 2007
AMC -- Nine “Study” Groups Robinson-Patman Act “New Economy” Issues Enforcement Institutions Merger Enforcement International Issues Exclusionary Conduct Immunities & Exemptions Regulated Industries Remedies
Hot Issues at the Agencies Exemptions & Immunities • State action doctrine • Noerr-Pennington Merger Review Process • Merger guidelines commentary • FTC task force • HSR enforcement “Criminal” Issues