70 likes | 209 Views
KAKARIZKIA PURWITO, 2201407102 THE USE OF SINGLE SLOT SUBSTITUTION DRILLS TO TEACH SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE FOR THE SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 1 BAWANG, BATANG IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 20102011. Identitas Mahasiswa.
E N D
KAKARIZKIA PURWITO, 2201407102THE USE OF SINGLE SLOT SUBSTITUTION DRILLS TO TEACH SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE FOR THE SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 1 BAWANG, BATANG IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2010\2011
Identitas Mahasiswa • - NAMA : KAKARIZKIA PURWITO - NIM : 2201407102 - PRODI : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris - JURUSAN : BAHASA & SASTRA INGGRIS - FAKULTAS : Bahasa dan Seni - EMAIL : kakachin7 pada domain gmail.com - PEMBIMBING 1 : Sri Wuli F, S.Pd., M. Pd - PEMBIMBING 2 : Drs. Suprapto, M.Hum. - TGL UJIAN : 2011-08-09
Judul • THE USE OF SINGLE SLOT SUBSTITUTION DRILLS TO TEACH SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE FOR THE SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 1 BAWANG, BATANG IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2010\2011
Abstrak • Observations show that the teacher still uses a conventional technique in teaching simple present tense to the seventh grade students of SMP N 1 Bawang. The students find some difficulties in learning this tense. Therefore, this study investigates the use of single slot substitution drills as a technique in teaching simple present tense. The objectives of this study were to find out to what extent single slot substitution drills contributed to the development of the mastery in simple present tense of the seventh grade students of SMP N 1 Bawang in the academic year of 2010/2011 and to find out to what extent single slot substitution drills contributed to the development of the positive attitude in learning simple present tense of the seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Bawang in the academic year of 2010/2011. This study was a classroom action research which was conducted in two cycles. The data in this study were collected through the use of test in the form of multiple choice items and non-test instruments in the form of first and second questionnaire. Data analysis was done by using quantitative and qualitative description. The research findings showed that there was a significant difference in the students‘ achievement in simple present tense before and after using single slot substitution drill technique. The average score in the pre-test was 48.88, in cycle 1 was 70.05, in cycle two was 77.29, and in the post-test was 82.52. It proved that the result of the post-test was better than the standard score of KTSP (2006) that was 65. The results of the questionnaire showed that students‘ positive attitude in learning simple present tense got increased. The result of the research shows that single slot substitution drill technique gives contribution in developing students‘ mastery and students‘ positive attitude towards simple present tense. Therefore, it is suggested that teachers should use single slot substitution drills as an alternative technique in teaching simple present tense.
Kata Kunci • single slot substitution drill, simple present tense, action research.
Referensi • Afiani, Ervina. 2008. The Effectiveness of Using Still Pictures in Teaching Simple Present Tense (A Case Study of the Fifth Grade Students of SDN 11 Bugel Grobogan in the Academic Year of 2008-2009). Unpublished. Alter, J.B. 1992. English Usage and Grammar. New York: Preston Corporation (Pte) Ltd. Arikunto, Suharsismi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta. Brown, Douglas H. 2004. Language Assessment: Principle and Classroom Practices. USA: Sanfrancisco State University. Celce-Murcia, Marianne and Diane Larsen-Freeman. 1983. The Grammar Book: an ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course. Boston: Newbury House. Cokely, Dennis and Charlotte Baker-Shenk. 1991. American Sign Language: A Teacher’s Resource Text on Curriculum, Methods, and Evaluation. Washington: Gallaudet University Press. Cook, Stanley J. and Richard W. Sutter. 1980. The Scope of Grammar:The Study of Modern Grammar. New York: Mc. Graw Hill Book Company. Declerck, Renaat. 2006. The Grammar of the English Tense System: A Comprehensive Analysis. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Depdiknas. 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Depdiknas. Gerot, Linda and Peter Wignell. 1994. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Sydney: Antipodean Educational Enterprises. Harris, David. 1969. Testing English as Second Language. New York: Mc Graw Hill Book Company. Heaton, J.B. 1975. Writing English Language Test. London: Longman Group Ltd. Hornby, A.S.(ed). 1995.Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2000. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. New York: Oxford University Press. Leech, Geoffrey, Margaret Deuchar, and Robert Hoogenraad R. 1982. English Grammar for Today. Houdmills: Macmillan Education LTD. Megayanti, Retno. 2010. Documentary Photographs as Media to Develop the Students’ Ability in Writing Analytical Exposition Text (An Action Research to the Eleventh Graders of SMA Negeri I Grobogan in the Academic Year 2009/2010 ). Unpublished. Mills, Geoffrey. 2000. Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Researcher. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc. Mills, Roxanne. 2007. Does Using an Internet Based Program for Improving Students Performance in Grammar and Punctuation Really Work in a College Composition Course? Oakland: Oakland City University. Murphy, Raymond. 1985. English Grammar in Use. New York: Cambridge University Press. Murphy, Raymond. 1997. Essential Grammar in Use. New York: Cambridge University Press. Nilson, Jeffrey. et al. 1984. Grammar and Composition. USA: Houghton Mifflin Company. Nunan, David. 1990. Second Language Teacher Education. United States of America: Cambridge University Press. Nusaningtyas, L. D. 2005. The Effectiveness of Using Activity Dominoes to Teach Simple Present Tense to Junior High School Students. Unpublished. Pertiwi, Atmayana Ike. 2010. The Effectiveness of Board Game to Develop Students’ Grammar Mastery of Simple Present Tense. Unpublished. Praninkas, Jean. 1961. Rapid Review of English Grammar. Prentice Hall Inc: Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Ramelan. 1992. Introduction to Linguistic Analysis. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press. Richards, Jack C. and Theodore S. Rogers. 1986. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press. Saleh, M. 2001. Pengantar Praktik Penelitian Pengajaran Bahasa. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press. Thornbury, Scott. 1999. How to Teach Grammar. England: Pearson Education Limited. Tuckman, B.W. 1978. Conducting Educational Research. London: Hartcourt Brace Jacobovits. . 2006. The Audio-Lingual Method: Lecture and Activities. Online at http://newterra.chemeketa.edu/faculty/Education/ed257/week7/intro.htm. [Acessed 04/26/2010) . 2009. Drills in Teaching. Online at http://ayoellg.wordpress.com/2009/ 03/30/drills-in-teaching/. [Acessed on 04/26/2010] .2004. Substitution Drill. Online at http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/ think/knowledge-wiki/substitution-drill. [Acessed on 04/26/2010] Audio Lingual Method. Online at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio Lingual_Method. [Acessed on 04/26/2010] Drills and Excercises in Language Teaching. Online at http://www. ciil-ebooks.net/html/drills/ch2.htm. [Acessed on 04/26/2010]
Terima Kasih • http://unnes.ac.id