1 / 32

Lecture 3: Uninformed Search

Lecture 3: Uninformed Search. ICS 270a Winter 2003. Summary. Uninformed Blind search Breadth-first uniform first depth-first Iterative deepening depth-first Bidirectional Branch and Bound Informed Heuristic search (next class) Greedy search, hill climbing, Heuristics

ranit
Download Presentation

Lecture 3: Uninformed Search

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lecture 3: Uninformed Search ICS 270a Winter 2003

  2. Summary • Uninformed Blind search • Breadth-first • uniform first • depth-first • Iterative deepening depth-first • Bidirectional • Branch and Bound • Informed Heuristic search (next class) • Greedy search, hill climbing, Heuristics • Important concepts: • Completeness • Time complexity • Space complexity • Quality of solution

  3. Graph and Tree notations

  4. Search Tree Notation • Branching degree, b • b is the number of children of a node • Depth of a node, d • number of branches from root to a node • Arc weight, Cost of a path • n  n’ , n parent node of n’, a child node • Node generation • Node expansion • Search policy: • determines the order of nodes expansion • Two kinds of nodes in the tree • Open Nodes (Fringe) • nodes which are not expanded (i.e., the leaves of the tree) • Closed Nodes • nodes which have already been expanded (internal nodes) d = Depth 0 1 2 S b=2 G

  5. B C A G S D F E Example: Map Navigation S = start, G = goal, other nodes = intermediate states, links = legal transitions

  6. Example of a Search Tree S D A D B E E C Note: this is the search tree at some particular point in in the search.

  7. Search Method 1: Breadth First Search S D A B A E D S E E C F S B B (Use the simple heuristic of not generating a child node if that node is a parent to avoid “obvious” loops: this clearly does not avoid all loops and there are other ways to do this)

  8. Breadth-First Search

  9. Breadth-First-Search (*) 1. Put the start node s on OPEN 2. If OPEN is empty exit with failure. 3. Remove the first node n from OPEN and place it on CLOSED. 4. If n is a goal node, exit successfully with the solution obtained by tracing back pointers from n to s. 5. Otherwise, expand n, generating all its successors attach to them pointers back to n, and put them at the end of OPEN in some order. • Go to step 2. For Shortest path or uniform cost: 5’ Otherwise, expand n, generating all its successors attach to them pointers back to n, and put them in OPEN in order of shortest cost path. * This simplified version does not check for loops

  10. What is the Complexity of Breadth-First Search? • Time Complexity • assume (worst case) that there is 1 goal leaf at the RHS • so BFS will expand all nodes = 1 + b + b2+ ......... + bd = O (bd) • Space Complexity • how many nodes can be in the queue (worst-case)? • at depth d-1 there are bd unexpanded nodes in the Q = O (bd) d=0 d=1 d=2 G d=0 d=1 d=2 G

  11. Examples of Time and Memory Requirements for Breadth-First Search Depth of Nodes Solution Expanded Time Memory 0 1 1 millisecond 100 bytes 2 111 0.1 seconds 11 kbytes 4 11,111 11 seconds 1 megabyte 8 108 31 hours 11 giabytes 12 1012 35 years 111 terabytes Assuming b=10, 1000 nodes/sec, 100 bytes/node

  12. Breadth-First Search (BFS) Properties • Solution Length: optimal • Generates every node just once • Search Time: O(Bd) • Memory Required: O(Bd) • Drawback: require exponential space 1 2 3 7 4 6 5 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

  13. Search Method 2: Depth First Search (DFS) S D A B D E C Here, to avoid repeated states assume we don’t expand any child node which appears already in the path from the root S to the parent. (Again, one could use other strategies) F D G

  14. Depth-First Search

  15. Depth-First-Search (*) 1. Put the start node s on OPEN 2. If OPEN is empty exit with failure. 3. Remove the first node n from OPEN and place it on CLOSED. 4. If n is a goal node, exit successfully with the solution obtained by tracing back pointers from n to s. 5. Otherwise, expand n, generating all its successors attach to them pointers back to n, and put them at the top of OPEN in some order. 6. Go to step 2.

  16. What is the Complexity of Depth-First Search? • Time Complexity • assume (worst case) that there is 1 goal leaf at the RHS • so DFS will expand all nodes =1 + b + b2+ ......... + bd = O (bd) • Space Complexity • how many nodes can be in the queue (worst-case)? • at depth l < d we have b-1 nodes • at depth d we have b nodes • total = (d-1)*(b-1) + b = O(bd) d=0 d=1 d=2 G d=0 d=1 d=2 d=3 d=4

  17. Techniques for Avoiding Repeated States S • Method 1 • do not create paths containing cycles (loops) • Method 2 • never generate a state generated before • must keep track of all possible states (uses a lot of memory) • e.g., 8-puzzle problem, we have 9! = 362,880 states • Method 1 is most practical, work well on most problems B S B C C C S B S State Space Example of a Search Tree

  18. Example, diamond networks

  19. Depth-First Search (DFS) Properties • Non-optimal solution path • Incomplete unless there is a depth bound • Reexpansion of nodes, • Exponential time • Linear space

  20. Comparing DFS and BFS • Same worst-case time Complexity, but • In the worst-case BFS is always better than DFS • Sometime, on the average DFS is better if: • many goals, no loops and no infinite paths • BFS is much worse memory-wise • DFS is linear space • BFS may store the whole search space. • In general • BFS is better if goal is not deep, if infinite paths, if many loops, if small search space • DFS is better if many goals, not many loops, • DFS is much better in terms of memory

  21. Iterative Deepening (DFS) • Every iteration is a DFS with a depth cutoff. Iterative deepening (ID) • i = 1 • While no solution, do • DFS from initial state S0 with cutoff i • If found goal, stop and return solution, else, increment cutoff Comments: • ID implements BFS with DFS • Only one path in memory • BFS at step i may need to keep 2i nodes in OPEN

  22. Iterative deepening search

  23. Comments on Iterative Deepening Search • Complexity • Space complexity = O(bd) • (since its like depth first search run different times) • Time Complexity • 1 + (1+b) + (1 +b+b2) + .......(1 +b+....bd) • = O(bd) (i.e., asymptotically the same as BFS or DFS in the the worst case) • The overhead in repeated searching of the same subtrees is small relative to the overall time • e.g., for b=10, only takes about 11% more time than DFS • A useful practical method • combines • guarantee of finding an optimal solution if one exists (as in BFS) • space efficiency, O(bd) of DFS • But still has problems with loops like DFS

  24. Iterative Deepening (DFS) • Time: • BFS time is O(bn) • B is the branching degree • ID is asymptotically like BFS • For b=10 d=5 d=cut-off • DFS = 1+10+100,…,=111,111 • IDS = 123,456 • Ratio is

  25. Bidirectional Search • Idea • simultaneously search forward from S and backwards from G • stop when both “meet in the middle” • need to keep track of the intersection of 2 open sets of nodes • What does searching backwards from G mean • need a way to specify the predecessors of G • this can be difficult, • e.g., predecessors of checkmate in chess? • what if there are multiple goal states? • what if there is only a goal test, no explicit list? • Complexity • time complexity is best: O(2 b(d/2)) = O(b (d/2)), worst: O(bd+1) • memory complexity is the same

  26. Bi-Directional Search

  27. Bi-Directional Search (continued)

  28. Uniform Cost Search • Expand lowest-cost OPEN node (g(n)) • In BFS g(n) = depth(n) • Requirement • g(successor)(n))  g(n)

  29. Uniform cost search 1. Put the start node s on OPEN 2. If OPEN is empty exit with failure. 3. Remove the first node n from OPEN and place it on CLOSED. 4. If n is a goal node, exit successfully with the solution obtained by tracing back pointers from n to s. 5. Otherwise, expand n, generating all its successors attach to them pointers back to n, and put them at the end of OPEN in order of shortest cost • Go to step 2. DFS Branch and Bound At step 4: compute the cost of the solution found and update the upper bound U. at step 5:expand n, generating all its successors attach to them pointers back to n, and put in OPEN in order of shortest cost. Compute cost of paretial path to node and prune if larger than U. .

  30. Comparison of Algorithms

  31. Summary • A review of search • a search space consists of states and operators: it is a graph • a search tree represents a particular exploration of search space • There are various strategies for “uninformed search” • breadth-first • depth-first • iterative deepening • bidirectional search • Uniform cost search • Depth-first branch and bound • Repeated states can lead to infinitely large search trees • we looked at methods for for detecting repeated states • All of the search techniques so far are “blind” in that they do not look at how far away the goal may be: next we will look at informed or heuristic search, which directly tries to minimize the distance to the goal. Example we saw: greedy search

More Related