280 likes | 379 Views
Hybrid Discrete-Continuous Optimization for the Frequency Assignment Problem in Satellite Communications System Kata KIATMANAROJ, Christian ARTIGUES, Laurent HOUSSIN (LAAS), Fr édéric MESSINE (IRIT). Contents. Problem definition Discrete optimization Continuous optimization Hybrid method
E N D
Hybrid Discrete-Continuous Optimization for the Frequency Assignment Problem in Satellite Communications System Kata KIATMANAROJ, Christian ARTIGUES, Laurent HOUSSIN (LAAS), Frédéric MESSINE (IRIT)
Contents • Problem definition • Discrete optimization • Continuous optimization • Hybrid method • Conclusions and perspectives
Problem definition • To assign a limited number of frequencies to as many users as possible within the service area
Problem definition • To assign a limited number of frequencies to as many users as possible within the service area • Frequency is a limited resource! • Frequency reuse -> co-channel interference • Intra-system interference
Problem definition • To assign a limited number of frequencies to as many users as possible within the service area • Frequency is a limited resource! • Frequency reuse -> co-channel interference • Intra-system interference • Graph coloring problem • NP-hard
Problem definition • Interferenceconstraints Binary interference Cumulative interference i i j j k
Problem definition • Satellite beam & antenna gain
Discrete optimization • Integer Linear Programming • Greedy algorithms
Discrete optimization • Integer Linear Programming (ILP)
Discrete optimization • Greedy algorithms • User selection rules • Frequency selection rules
Discrete optimization • Greedy algorithms • User selection rules • Frequency selection rules
Discrete optimization • Performance comparison: ILP vs. Greedy
Discrete optimization • ILP performances
Continuous optimization • Beam moving algorithm • For each unassigned user • Continuously move the interferers’ beams from their center positions-> reduce interference • Non-linear antenna gain • Minimize the move • Not violating interference constraints
Continuous optimization • Matlab’s solver fmincon i j x k
Continuous optimization • Matlab’s solver fmincon i j x k
Continuous optimization • Matlab’s solver fmincon i j x k
Continuous optimization • Matlab’s solver fmincon i j x k
Continuous optimization • Matlab’s solver fmincon i j x k
Continuous optimization • Matlab’s solver fmincon • Parameters: k, MAXINEG, UTVAR
Hybrid method • Beam moving results with k-MAXINEG-UTVAR = 7-2-0
Hybrid method • Beam moving results with k-MAXINEG-UTVAR = 7-2-0
Hybrid method • Closed-loop implementation
Conclusions and further study • Greedy algorithm vs. ILP • Beam Moving algorithm benefit • Closed-loop implementation benefit vs. time • Further improvements