1 / 26

Issues in water resource management -- Property Rights

Issues in water resource management -- Property Rights. Nirmal Sengupta. Apart from their use as law, the property rights structure the belief systems of the people. both property law & beliefs dictates management of water resources. Types of property :. State Property

rashad-sherman
Download Presentation

Issues in water resource management -- Property Rights

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Issues in water resource management -- Property Rights Nirmal Sengupta

  2. Apart from their use as law, the property rights structure the belief systems of the people. both property law & beliefs dictates management of water resources

  3. Types of property : • State Property • Private Property • Common Property • Not Property (not yet defined)

  4. Isuue: The State of Property rights on water in INDIA Property is not full-fledged ownership, with complete rights of exclusion, transfer and use. It is a fine bundle of rights (and responsibilities). The bundle of right here is specific to India.

  5. Evolution of Property Rights in India REGULATING ACTS (1773- ) by British Parliament Led primarily to development of private property in modern India

  6. But the incentives of Trading Company were differentfrom that of normal State Result was Distinctive development of Private Property in India and distinct common property relations

  7. Incentives of the East India Company trade land revenue Early experiments settled to --

  8. Permanent Settlement (1793) Due to asset specificity - long-term contract worked better. Economy prospered. But Trader State gained no share of prosperity. Hence a new approach for later settlements: Ryotwari Settlement (1800) Enabling regular revision of land revenue.

  9. Ryotwari Land Settlement(the root of the current system) • Non-revenue land- commonlyWaste Land • waste – till settled i.e. pre-eminence of State right • Non-revenue land – water, forests, • grazing grounds, • fishing grounds

  10. ‘ Waste Land ‘ Left for use as such till State find some use. In course of time -- Forests: settled for agriculture & commercial use Grazing grounds: settled for reclamation. Fishing patches: Open access. Land for Irrigation works Was not revenue producing But not ‘ Waste Land ‘ to be settled later Left for use as such till State find some use. (Pre-eminence of State)

  11. IMPLICATIONS --ambiguities and inconsistent judicial interpretationsBut no change in fundamentals. Later Modifications : • Customary Rights • Panchayat Act • Administrative Reforms

  12. India – surface water the bundle of rights The people enjoy some appropriation and use rights. But the state right is paramount and can be exerted at will.

  13. Consequent features (1) : For acquisitionof natural and local water sources, no eminent domain argument is required. -- as is for land.

  14. Features (2) : No formal attenuation of surface water rights needed. -- compare with recent groundwater regulation. Private right on groundwater recognised by Easement Act.

  15. Features (3) : Rights on surface water discussed as – division of rights between hierarchies (and departments) of government. -- not as rights of users, locals.

  16. Accompanying Responsibilities

  17. Ryotwari area:Irrigation increases land revenue earnings State as Provider of Irrigation Formation of PWD (1850) But private initiative absent and discouraged

  18. Irrigation Dept. / PWD • Assigned responsibilities to panchayats etc. But gave no rights. • Irrigation & Drainage Acts too assigned responsibilities but gave no rights.

  19. Reform Effortsthree sources Farmers’ demands 73rd Amendment International Agencies (a) Participatory programmes (b)Privatisation

  20. PRI, Turn-over Programmes -- State has not relinquished rights, or granted limited right. These organizations are facing pressure from different government bodies.

  21. Recent Privatisations -- State has systematically transferred water right to private corporations. These organizations are not facing any pressure from government bodies.

  22. Common Property -- Water from common source – de facto CPR but not formal Present – limited transfer of rights • Turn Over programs only about distribution Also, state right still paramount.

  23. to Sum Up

  24. The Users - • have private right on groundwater not on surface water • enjoy some appropriation and use rights • but the state right is paramount and can be exerted at will • rights on surface water seen as division of rights between hierarchies/departments of government

  25. Consequences - • Excessive dependence on STATE - seen as the provider of irrigation, drinking water, hydropower • private initiatives - absent and discouraged • STATE is now systematically transferring water right to private corporations. • common property relations – de facto not formal • ambiguities in judicial interpretations

More Related