150 likes | 335 Views
World Bank Land Governance Study. Tony Burns Land Equity International 19 November 2007. Topics. Governance Governance Issues in Land Sector Study Objectives Study Participants Draft Conceptual Framework Approach. Governance. Governance is a topical issue
E N D
World Bank Land Governance Study Tony Burns Land Equity International 19 November 2007
Topics • Governance • Governance Issues in Land Sector • Study Objectives • Study Participants • Draft Conceptual Framework • Approach
Governance • Governance is a topical issue • Some well established indices: • Weberian Comparative Study (1970-1990) • Global Competitive Index (1979-2005) • Corruption Perception Index (1995-present) • World Governance Assessment (1996-2000, 2001-2006) • Freedom House (1972-present) • Afrobarometer (1999-2003) • Global Integrity Index (2003-2004, 2006) • Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2003, 2006) • Useful, but limited in ability to track changes in time or identify specific policy interventions
Governance in the Land Sector • Governance is an issue in the land sector: • High profile corruption cases in the land sector (Kenya, Indonesia, China, Tanzania, Cambodia) • TI survey in South Asia in 2002 – land 2nd most prone to corruption in Pakistan, 3rd in India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka • Thailand – university study in 1999 found land fourth most prone to corruption (after Customs, Police and Revenue Departments) • FAO study on Governance in Land Sector (2007) • Not just a developing country issue (e.g. van der Molen 2007)
Study Objectives Undertake a study of governance in the land sector that comprehensively identifies the issues that need to be addressed and provide practitioners as well as policy-makers with information on how to tackle them in an integrated manner at the country level.
Study Objectives The study will: • establish a conceptual framework for good governance in the land sector • apply this framework to specific country cases (Kenya, Indonesia, Peru, Kyrgyz Republic) • aim to translate case study results and the conceptual framework into a set of indicators that could be regularly monitored within country and at a more global level.
Study Participants • Study commissioned by World Bank LTG/ARD • Steering group • Scope for additional countries/collaboration • Land Equity International contracted, with support from: • University of Melbourne, Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructure and Land Administration • Washington University in St Louis, Center for New Institutional Social Sciences • Range of international experts (private, academic) • Four experienced Country Case Coordinators
Draft Conceptual Framework Based on experience, key land principles: • A variety of land rights are legally recognized and protected • Cost-effective service delivery by land institutions • Broad access to land administration information • Transparent public land management/expropriation • Transparent systems for property valuation and taxation • Accessible/responsive institutions for enforcement and appeal
Approach and Methodology • Complete draft conceptual framework – Dec. 2007 • Documented framework – early 2008 • eConference – 14-25 Jan. 2008 • Expert Group review 15 Feb. 2008 • Regional Workshop in St Louis – 16-18 Feb. 2008 • Field test questionnaire – March 2008 • Undertake Case Studies – June – July 2008 • Final synthesis report – October 2008