210 likes | 233 Views
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MQF, MQA 01 and OBE Process. 9 areas of evaluation. Area 1: Vision, Mission, Educational Goals And Learning Outcomes Area 2: Curriculum Design And Delivery Area 3: Assessment Of Students Area 4: Student Selection And Support Services Area 5: Academic Staff
E N D
9 areas of evaluation • Area 1: Vision, Mission, Educational Goals And Learning Outcomes • Area 2: Curriculum Design And Delivery • Area 3: Assessment Of Students • Area 4: Student Selection And Support Services • Area 5: Academic Staff • Area 6: Educational Resources • Area 7: Programme Monitoring And Review • Area 8: Leadership, Governance And Administration • Area 9: Continual Quality Improvement (MQA,2008)
3 MAIN FEATURES IN MQF (1) Academic Levels MQF (2) Learning Outcomes (3) Credit System
OBE PROCESS Area 1 Area 8 MQF 1 Curriculum Program Standards PEO Planning (1) Curriculum REVIEW Academic Level Program Outcomes (PO) Area 9 CQI Report MQF 2 Area 2 Closing the Loop (CDL) Curriculum Bloom’s Taxonomy Evaluating (4) Developing (2) Evaluate / analyse Course Outcomes (CO) Area 3 Area 7 TL Activities Assessments Entrance/Exit Surveys Bloom’s Taxonomy MQF 3 SLT Test Blueprint Implementing (3) Lesson Plan Credit Hour Marking Scheme Rubrics Evidences Curriculum Area 4 Student Portfolio Documenting Bloom’s Taxonomy Area 5 Formative Assessment Area 6 Summative Assessment
The Main Thrusts of QA After MQF Toward a system based on learning outcomes not inputs From Quality Control to Quality Assurance leading to Quality Enhancement Away from arbitrary ratios toward judgment based on evidence Greater responsibility for HEPs Roz. From MQF 2 PS
Quality Control to Quality Assurance Quality Enhancement Quality Assurance QualityControl The mechanisms, processes, techniques and activities necessary to ascertain whether a specified standard or requirement is being achieved. Checking performance indicators, including examination results, number of publications, staff appraisal data. Review procedures designed to safeguard academic standards and promote learning opportunities for students of acceptable quality. Taking deliberate steps to bring about continual improvement in the effectiveness of the learning experience of students.
Comparison of Quality Control and Quality Enhancement MQF.Roz.Roadshow
Impact of MQF on QA Documents sets out guidelines to HEP and Assessors in relation to programme accreditation The Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation (COPPA) The Code of Practice for Institutional Audit (COPIA) • sets out guidelines to HEP and Assessors in relation to institutional audit Guidelines to Good Practices (GGPs) sets out guidelines pertaining to non-curriculum matters, e.g. student intake, library and education resources Programme Standards sets out guidelines pertaining to curriculum and programme design MQF.Roz.Roadshow
MQF and other QA Documents Level of Adherence MQF = Malaysian Qualifications Framework CoP = Codes of Practice GGP = Guidelines on Good Practices PSs = Programme Standards Level of Prescriptiveness MQF.Roz.Roadshow • MQF Generic statements on Generic issues • CoP Specific statements on Generic issues • GGP Generic statements on Specific areas • PSs Specific statements on Specific areas
Item No.9 - Course Learning Outcomes (CLO) Identify Bloom’s Domains and Levels Identify PLO to address Map CLO to PLO (No.16), then to PEO (No.15) From mapping, rationalise inclusion of course (No.4) From mapping, identify Transferable skills (KI) (No.10) From CLO and transferable skills, strategise teaching methods and assessment methods (No.11) From strategy, identify delivery mode (No.13) and Assessment Types (No.14) From TLA and assessment methods, identify and calculate SLT for content topics and outline (No.17) From SLT for content topics and outline, calculate Total SLT (No.6) From Total SLT, calculate credit for course (No.7)
COMPILED DURING SEMESTER DEVELOPED AFTER SEMESTER AND EXAM