340 likes | 360 Views
EGN 6133 Enterprise Systems Engineering. Chin- Sheng Chen Florida International University. T1-1 Short Visit to History of Enterprise Operations. Classic enterprise operations Concepts related to enterprise engineering The business system dynamics (diamond)
E N D
EGN 6133Enterprise Systems Engineering Chin-Sheng Chen Florida International University
T1-1 Short Visit to History of Enterprise Operations • Classic enterprise operations • Concepts related to enterprise engineering • The business system dynamics (diamond) • Business process re-engineering (BPR) • Systems integration (ERP I and II) • Trend and enterprise systems of future
Classic Enterprise Operations • Source • The Wealth of Nations • By Adam Smith • Principles • Division of labor • Economies of scale • Hierarchical control
The business system dynamics (diamond) • Values and beliefs • Business processes • Jobs and structures • Management and measurement systems
Business process reengineering (BPR) • Definition • Fundamental rethinking and radical redesign of business processes to achieve dramatic improvement in critical, contemporary measures of performance, such as cost, quality, service, and speed.
Four key words in BPR • Fundamental • Radical • Dramatic • processes
BPR: Business processes • A business process is a set of organized activities • for a business objective or • That delivers value to a customer. • Enterprise operation is a business process • A process may have sub-processes • Processes are usually invisible, unnamed, and unmanaged • Because like-activities are grouped into functional departments • And processes go through various departments.
BPR: Typical business processes • Manufacturing • From procurement to shipment • Product development • From concept to prototype • Concept formulation • From need to concept design • Order fulfillment • From order to payment • Service • From inquiry to resolution
A BPR example - Ford Motors (1) • Background • Accounts payable department of 500 workers in 80’s • Set a goal to reduce 20% head counts • It acquired 25% interest in Mazda at the time and found out it had only five workers.
A BPR example - Ford Motors (2) • Effort • Re-engineer the process (not an org. unit) of procurement (including the accounts payable) • Eliminate invoice via an on-line database, • so that payment authorization is shifted to the receiving dock • from the account payable, who had tomatch PO with invoice and receiving documents.
A BPR example - Ford Motors (3) • Result • The new process • A buyer in the purchase department issues a PO to a vendor and enters it to an online database. • Vendors send goods to the receiving dock • At the dock, a receiving clerk checks at the computer terminal if the received shipment correspond to an outstanding in the database. • If so, the goods are recorded and the computer will automatically issue and send a check to the vendor at the appropriate time. • It ended up with 125 workers in vendor payment at the end. • Handling only exceptions (Pareto 80-20 rules)
A BPR example - Ford Motors (4) • Lessons learned • Reverse the industrial revolution (division of labor) • Flatten the organization to eliminate fragmentation and bureaucracy • Process orientation • Ambition • Rule-breaking • Creative use of information technology
BPR enabler - Information Technology ·Shared database ·Expert systems · Telecommunication networks ·Decision support tools ·Portable & wireless data communication ·Interactive videodisk ·Automatic ID and tracking systems ·High performance computing
BPR: Common themes • Several jobs are combined into one • Workers make decisions • Processes have multiple versions • Work is performed where it makes the most sense. • Checks and controls are reduced • Reconciliation (consolidating redundant papers) is minimized. • Hybrid centralized/decentralized operations are prevalent.
BPR: Changes in re-engineered business processes • Work units changes – from functional departments to process teams • Jobs change – from simple to multi-dimensional work • People’s role change – from controlled to empowered • Job preparation changes – from training to education • Focus of performance measures and compensation shifts – from activity to results • Advancement criteria change – from performance to ability • Values change – from protective to productive • Managers change – from supervisors to coaches • organizational structures change – from hierarchical to flat • Executives change – from score keepers to leaders
BPR: What re-engineering is NOT: • Automation • More efficient way of doing wrong things • Software re-engineering • Use more sophisticated computer system) • Downsizing • Reduce capacity to meet lower demand • Other re-s • Restructuring • re-organizing • Flattening • De-layering • Quality improvement (TQM) • Kaizen: continuous incremental improvement
BPR: Who re-engineer • leader • steering committee • reengineering czar • reengineering team • process owner
BPR: Three criteria to identify re-engineering opportunities • Dysfunction • the processes that are in deepest trouble • Importance • the processes with the greatest impact on the company’s customers • Feasibility • the processes most susceptible to successful redesign
BPR: Broken processes (1) • Observation • extensive information exchange, data redundancy, and re-keying • Problem • arbitrary fragmentation of a natural process • Solution • consolidate fragmented tasks, when feasible
BPR: Broken processes (2) • Observation • inventory, buffers, and other assets • Problem • system slack to cope with uncertainty • Solution • structure processes such that suppliers and customers plan and schedule their respective work together.
BPR: Broken processes (3) • Observation • High ratio of checking and control to value adding • Problem • Fragmentation • Solution • Eliminate managers’ mistrust and incompetence that come from fragmentation
BPR: Broken processes (4) • Observation • rework and iteration • Problem • inadequate feedback along chains • Solution • eliminate mistakes
BPR: Broken processes (5) • Observation • complexity, exceptions, and special cases • Problem • growth onto a simple base (simple process grows complex). • Solution • develop simple processes with decision points
BPR: Important business processes • From customer’s point of view • product quality and features • product cost • on-time delivery • Customer service • Product life cycle
BPR: Factors for choosing feasible processes for re-engineering • Likelihood of success • Commitment of the process owner • Strength of the re-engineering team • Cost • Lead time
BPR: The re-engineering process • identify a process to reengineer • understand the current process • what and why including input & output, but not how • understand how the customer uses the output of the process • by watching how it does • Redesign • try to avoid benchmarking, as it may limit the team’s innovation
BPR Principles • Work is best organized around outcomes, not tasks • As few people as possible should be involved in the performance of a process • Identify and destroy assumptions • Look for opportunities for creative application of information technology
Additional BPR principles as role players • You don’t need to be an expert to redesign a process • Being an outsider helps • Your have to discard preconceived notions • It’s important to see things through the customer’s eyes. • Redesign is best done in teams. • Your don’t need to know much about the current process • It’s not hard to have great ideas • Redesign can be fun.
Avoidance in BPR (1) • Try to fix a process instead of changing it • Don’t focus on business processes • Ignore everything except process redesign (as it affects others). • Neglect people’s values and beliefs • Be willing to settle for minor results • Quit too early • Place prior constraints on the definition of the problem and the scope of the reengineering effort • Allow existing corporate cultures and management attitudes to prevent reengineering from getting started. • Try to make reengineering happen from the bottom up.
Avoidance in BPR (2) • Assign someone who doesn’t understand reengineering to lead the effort • Skimp on the resources devoted to reengineering • Bury reengineering in the middle of the corporate agenda • Dissipate energy across a great many reengineering projects • Attempt to reengineer when the CEO is 2 years from retirement • Fail to distinguish reengineering from other business improvement programs • Concentrate exclusively on design • Try to make reengineering happen without making anybody unhappy • Pull back when people resist making re-engineering’s changes • Drag the effort out (should not longer than 12 months)
MRP & ERP • MRP • Islands of automation • Management information systems (MIS) • ERP • Systems & Data integration • MIS
Trend & Future • EOS • Enterprise operations systems • Industry (revolution) IV • Online, real-time, Internet, mobile • Integrated with machine devices • Networked intelligent agents
Modern business environment • Knowledge-intensive product/service • Innovation • Consumer’s market • Individuality • Mass customization • Very dynamic and short product lifecycle • Concurrent engineering/operations • Highly mobile labor market • Agile manufacturing • Free products or services
Characteristics of Modern Enterprises • Innovation • First in the market (market pre-emption) • Mass customization • Quick response • No inventory • Virtual resources (collaborative via SCM) • Scalability • Agility • Corporate intelligence • Product & manufacturing processes • Business process