570 likes | 596 Views
Learn to identify, evaluate, and improve failing IT systems for optimal performance, cost savings, and alignment with strategic objectives. Explore VFM audit concepts, objectives, methods, and evidence sources.
E N D
INTOSAI IT audit training Value For Money
VFM audit of IT • Objective • By the end of the module you will be able to: • build a business model; • identify significant IT systems • identify and evaluate evidence of failing IT systems • recognise explanations for IT system failure • assess the development environment to see that sound management practices minimise risks
The course schedule • Scope of Value For Money audit • VFM audit method • VFM audit experience
VFM audit concepts Value For Money = Performance = 3 Es • Economy is concerned with spending less by minimising the cost of resources of a given quality. • Efficiency is concerned with spending well by minimising resources used for a given output. • Effectiveness is concerned with spending wisely by ensuring that the outputs achieved match the policy or operational objectives.
Economy • Failing to take bulk discounts • Using top quality paper for temporary outputs • Using expensive workstations where a dumb terminal would do • Making routine international calls at peak rate • Buying in resources when there is spare in-house capacity • Building your own system when a suitable off-the-shelf system is already available and cheaper, or visa versa. • Delivering IT services in-house when a cheaper outsourcing option is available.
Efficiency • Controls that serve no real purpose • Making frequent calls when one would do • Duplication of systems that perform the same function • Entry of information already held by the system
Effectiveness • Systems that serve no business function • Unreliable systems • Systems that produce reports that are never used
VFM audit objectives • Improving clients’ business management • Validating central guidance • Explain waste • Recommendations for corrective action
VFM audit method • Survey • Is it important? • Evidence of success or failure • Is it going wrong? • Explanation • Why is it going wrong? • Recommendation • What can be done now?
Survey • Objectives • Organisation • Resources • Performance • Prioritisation • IT Strategy and Environment • Systems
Objectives What the client aims to do • Owner • Hierarchical • Link to performance indicators • Link to activities
Weighting • 1. Mission=100 • 1.1 40 • 1.1.1 30 • 1.1.2 10 • 1.2 60 • 1.2.1 15 • 1.2.2 45
Organisation How the client aims to meet objectives • Policies and standards • Control environment • Culture • Activities
Activities • Produce outputs • Business units • Cost centres • Link to objectives • Link to performance indicators • Supported by information systems
Information systems • Support activities • Contribute to objectives • Monitor progress • Record resource usage • IT Strategy and Environment • IT Governance Maturity Model
Resources • Inputs to activities • Resource management • Internal versus external
Performance • Impact versus output • Performance regime • Performance indicators • Benchmarking • Stakeholders
Performance regime • Key indicators • Clear responsibilities • Good resource management system • Regular review • Decisive action • Targets
Performance indicators • Link to objectives and activities • Measurable • Comprehensive • Consistent • Comparable • Verifiable
Benchmarking • Activities • Impacts • Across time • Across organisations
Stakeholders • Customers • Politicians • Journalists • Academic and professional bodies
D A L E T K R O S S H E Framework for Audit and Control of Effectiveness Objectives Inputs ACTIVITIES Feedback Review AIM TARGET C O S T S Outputs Impacts Performance Indicators
Study selection • Poor performance • High cost • Strategic importance • Management weakness • Systematic failure • Relevance to many clients
Materiality of IT Programme costs IT costs AdministrationExpenditure
Importance of systems Programme delivery SYSTEMS IT Administration
Place of IT in studies • Part of explanation • Large projects • Comparative studies • Gross or systematic failures • Central guidance • Emerging technology
VFM audit method - Evidence • Survey • Is it important? • Evidence of success or failure • Is it going wrong? • Explanation • Why is it going wrong? • Recommendation • What can be done now?
Quality user dissatisfaction unreliable poor integration costly to run or maintain disputes with suppliers Time abandoned or delayed systems Cost expensive systems Evidence
User dissatisfaction - sources of evidence • Post implementation reviews • System owner • Survey • Interviews • Help desk • System usage statistics
User dissatisfaction - explanation • Strategy formulation and review • Requirements capture • Inadequate quality control • Operational management • Training and awareness
Unreliable systems - sources of evidence • Operations manager • System owner • Support staff • Maintenance records • Error logs
Unreliable systems - explanation • Design standards • Development standards • Maintenance • Operational management • Infrastructure
Poor integration - sources of evidence • Duplicate entry • Complex data conversion • Data administrator
Poor integration - explanation • IT strategy • End user computing • Procurement control • Development control
Cost overruns -sources of evidence • System owner • Business case • Project board minutes • IT steering committee • Project control documents • Management accounts • Post implementation reviews
Cost overruns - explanation • Investment appraisal • Project management • Design standards • Development standards • Operations management
Delays - sources of evidence • Strategic plans • System owner • Project board minutes • IT implementation schedules • Business case
Delays - explanation • Unrealistic timetable • Project management • User opposition
Failed projects - sources of evidence • IT strategies • IT steering committee • Post implementation reviews • Potential users • Finance department
Failed projects - explanation • Business case • Requirements capture • Project management
Costly maintenance - sources of evidence • Comparison with other systems • Resource management system • Change management records • System owner
Costly maintenance - explanation • Requirements capture • Flexibility • Development standards • Skills shortage
Supplier disputes - sources of evidence • Correspondence with supplier • Interview owner • Records of meetings
Supplier disputes - explanation • Inadequate specification • Unrealistic bid • Service level agreements
Lack of evidence is evidence of danger • No business plan • No IT strategy • No business case • No owner / users • No project plan or budget • No resource monitoring • No post implementation reviews
VFM audit method - Explanation • Survey • Is it important? • Evidence of success or failure • Is it going wrong? • Explanation • Why is it going wrong?
Explanation • IT standards • IT strategy • User involvement • Business case • Procurement • Project or operational management • Business continuity • Obsolescence
Explanation - IT standards • Strategy • Management • Design and development • Technical integration • Change management • Standards ignored?
Explanation - IT strategy • No link to business plan • Ignored • Unrealistic • Uncoordinated
Explanation - User involvement • No system owner • Poor requirements capture • Inadequate training and awareness • No formal user acceptance