870 likes | 1.23k Views
IMPLEMENTING CRITICAL PSYCHIATRY IN PRACTICE: POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE ASPECTS . D B Double. Critical psychiatry website. www.anti-psychiatry.co.uk. Critical psychiatry website. www.anti-psychiatry.co.uk www.uea.ac.uk/~wp276. Critical psychiatry website. www.anti-psychiatry.co.uk
E N D
IMPLEMENTING CRITICAL PSYCHIATRY IN PRACTICE: POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE ASPECTS D B Double
Critical psychiatry website • www.anti-psychiatry.co.uk
Critical psychiatry website • www.anti-psychiatry.co.uk • www.uea.ac.uk/~wp276
Critical psychiatry website • www.anti-psychiatry.co.uk • www.uea.ac.uk/~wp276 • Critical Psychiatry Network www.criticalpsychiatry.co.uk
Reservations about teaching critical psychiatry to medical students • Asked to take down webpages from my personal webspace
Reservations about teaching critical psychiatry to medical students • Asked to take down webpages from my personal webspace • Consultant colleagues concerned I may mislead students
Reservations about teaching critical psychiatry to medical students • Asked to take down webpages from my personal webspace • Consultant colleagues concerned I may mislead students • Suggested university should not be seen as linked with critical psychiatry
Critical psychiatry is a legitimate academic and clinical activity • University encourages both staff and students to use their personal webspace
Critical psychiatry is a legitimate academic and clinical activity • University encourages both staff and students to use their personal webspace • Academic freedom is essential for the development of unorthodox or new opinions
Critical psychiatry is a legitimate academic and clinical activity • University encourages both staff and students to use their personal webspace • Academic freedom is essential for the development of unorthodox or new opinions • Doctors should be encouraged to think about their professional role
Critical Psychiatry Network • Formed in 1999
Critical Psychiatry Network • Formed in 1999 • Small group of psychiatrists
Critical Psychiatry Network • Formed in 1999 • Small group of psychiatrists • Develop a critique of the contemporary psychiatric system.
Promoting the critical mental health movement • Ranges from reform to revolution
Promoting the critical mental health movement • Ranges from reform to revolution • Psychiatry can be practised without the justification of postulating brain pathology as the basis for mental illness
Promoting the critical mental health movement • Ranges from reform to revolution • Psychiatry can be practised without the justification of postulating brain pathology as the basis for mental illness • Mental disorders must show through the brain but not always in the brain
Criticism of psychiatry • Crisis of confidence created in the 1960s and 70s
Criticism of psychiatry • Crisis of confidence created in the 1960s and 70s • Particularly about its vague diagnostic categories
Criticism of psychiatry • Crisis of confidence created in the 1960s and 70s, • Particularly about its vague diagnostic categories • Rosenhan - psychiatric diagnosis is subjective and does not reflect inherent patient characteristics
Mainstream response • Psychiatrists do not detect pseudopatients simulating signs of mental illness – Spitzer
Mainstream response • Psychiatrists do not detect pseudopatients simulating signs of mental illness – Spitzer • “…assuredly an unreliable system must be invalid”
Mainstream response • Psychiatrists do not detect pseudopatients simulating signs of mental illness – Spitzer • “…assuredly an unreliable system must be invalid” • Operational diagnostic criteria for psychiatric disorders, initially for research, and then for psychiatric classifications, such as DSM-III
Neo-Kraepelinian approach • Psychiatry could again be assured about the validity of its diagnostic categories, which had now been much better defined
Neo-Kraepelinian approach • Psychiatry could again be assured about the validity of its diagnostic categories, which had now been much better defined • Associated with reaffirmation of implicit “medical model” with focus on brain mechanisms
Neo-Kraepelinian approach • Psychiatry could again be assured about the validity of its diagnostic categories, which had now been much better defined • Associated with reaffirmation of implicit “medical model” with focus on brain mechanisms and positivistic approach to science
Rotten reputation of anti-psychiatry • International movement against psychiatry which is “anti-medical, anti-therapeutic, anti-institutional and anti-scientific” (Roth 1973)
Rotten reputation of anti-psychiatry • International movement against psychiatry which is “anti-medical, anti-therapeutic, anti-institutional and anti-scientific” (Roth 1973) • Anti-psychiatry defined more by mainstream psychiatry than the identified protagonists themselves
Rotten reputation of anti-psychiatry • International movement against psychiatry which is “anti-medical, anti-therapeutic, anti-institutional and anti-scientific” (Roth 1973) • Anti-psychiatry defined more by mainstream psychiatry than the identified protagonists themselves • Generally seen as a passing phase in the history of psychiatry
Proponents of “anti-psychiatry” • David Cooper - “[P]sychiatry … has aligned itself far too closely with the alienated needs of society”
Proponents of “anti-psychiatry” • David Cooper - “[P]sychiatry … has aligned itself far too closely with the alienated needs of society” • RD Laing - “By and large psychiatry functions to exclude and repress those elements society wants excluded and repressed”
Proponents of “anti-psychiatry” • David Cooper - “[P]sychiatry … has aligned itself far too closely with the alienated needs of society” • RD Laing - “By and large psychiatry functions to exclude and repress those elements society wants excluded and repressed” • Thomas Szasz - State should not interfere in mental health practice or medicine in general
Biomedical vs interpretive approaches • “Mental diseases are brain diseases” – Wilhelm Griesinger 1845
Biomedical vs interpretive approaches • “Mental diseases are brain diseases” – Wilhelm Griesinger 1845 • “It is only from the neuropathological standpoint that one can try to make sense of the symptomatology of the insane"
Biomedical vs interpretive approaches • “Mental diseases are brain diseases” – Wilhelm Griesinger 1845 • “It is only from the neuropathological standpoint that one can try to make sense of the symptomatology of the insane" • "The notion, mental disease, must be deduced neither from the mind nor from the body, but from the relation of each to the other." Baron von Feuchtersleben 1845
Pluralism in psychiatry (1900-1970) • Psychoanalysis – Freud first spoke publicly in USA at Clark University in 1909
Pluralism in psychiatry (1900-1970) • Psychoanalysis – Freud first spoke publicly in USA at Clark University in 1909 • Pragmatic approach of Adolf Meyer - Psychobiology
Pluralism in psychiatry (1900-1970) • Psychoanalysis – Freud first spoke publicly in USA at Clark University in 1909 • Pragmatic approach of Adolf Meyer - Psychobiology • Interpersonal approach of Harry Stack Sullivan focused on the person
Definition of “critical” • Inclined to find fault, or to judge with severity
Definition of “critical” • Inclined to find fault, or to judge with severity • Characterised by careful, exact evaluation and judgement
Definition of “critical” • Inclined to find fault, or to judge with severity • Characterised by careful, exact evaluation and judgement • Of the greatest importance to the way things might happen
What is acceptable practice? • “Incompatible with effective teamwork in a community psychiatric service”
What is acceptable practice? • “Incompatible with effective teamwork in a community psychiatric service” • Inappropriate defensiveness in mainstream practice
What is acceptable practice? • “Incompatible with effective teamwork in a community psychiatric service” • Inappropriate defensiveness in mainstream practice • Apparent difference may lead to unnecessary polarisation in debate
Promoting critical practice • Diagnosis:
Promoting critical practice • Diagnosis: assessment is broader than simple diagnostic labels, even if rarely possible to be sure about the origins of personal problems.
Promoting critical practice • Diagnosis: assessment is broader than simple diagnostic labels, even if rarely possible to be sure about the origins of personal problems. • Treatment:
Promoting critical practice • Diagnosis: assessment is broader than simple diagnostic labels, even if rarely possible to be sure about the origins of personal problems. • Treatment: social support and personal therapy may be beneficial; medication has its place, but prescribing should not be beyond the evidence.
Psychiatric diagnosis • Should be person-centred and not necessarily imply a statement about bodily dysfunction
Psychiatric diagnosis • Should be person-centred and not necessarily imply a statement about bodily dysfunction • Attempt needs to be made to understand psychiatric presentations in personal and social terms
Psychiatric diagnosis • Should be person-centred and not necessarily imply a statement about bodily dysfunction • Attempt needs to be made to understand psychiatric presentations in personal and social terms • Not only about identifying disease, but also the reasons for human action