1 / 12

Measuring the Speed of Light

Measuring the Speed of Light. John Klumpp And Ainsley Niemkiewicz. Why Measure The Speed of Light?. Inherently Difficult Electrodynamics Theory of Relativity Actually, We Don’t. How We Do It. Measure Travel Time of Laser Pulse. Pros: Simple Straightforward Direct. Cons:

Download Presentation

Measuring the Speed of Light

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Measuring the Speed of Light John Klumpp And Ainsley Niemkiewicz

  2. Why Measure The Speed of Light? • Inherently Difficult • Electrodynamics • Theory of Relativity • Actually, We Don’t

  3. How We Do It • Measure Travel Time of Laser Pulse

  4. Pros: Simple Straightforward Direct Cons: Less Accurate More Time Consuming Oscilloscope Setup

  5. Pros: More Accurate Faster Cons: More Complicated Requires Calibration Many Components Electronic Circuitry Setup

  6. Data • Total Round Trip Distance: DAC = 62.71m • Short Trip Distance: DAB = .486m • Measured Flight Path Distance: DBC = 62.71m - .486m = 62.224m

  7. Oscilloscope Data Total round trip flight time, including lag, TAC, with signal amplitude 138.8mV: TAB, TBC, calculation of SoL with signal amplitude 136.4mV: (TBC = TAC – TAB, SoL = DBC/TBC = 62.224/TBC)

  8. Electronic Circuitry Data Calibration: • Time Calibrator Set to 40nS • MCA Histogram Peaks at 2570mV and 2970mV • Conclusion: 400mV=40ns  10mV=1nS

  9. Measurement of TBC: • Short Trip Peak at 510mV ~TAB • Long Trip Peak at 2599mV ~TAC • TBC ~ 2599mV – 510mV = 2089mV • Applying Calibration Constant, TBC = 208.9nS • We thus have c=d/t = 62.224m/208.9nS =2.979 * 108m/S = c

  10. Data Analysis Oscilloscope: • Average of five measurements • Uncertainty comes from-distance measurement-correlating peak locations • C = (2.983±.05)*108m/s • % Error = .498%

  11. Data Analysis • Electronic Circuitry • Electronic time measurements • Computer analysis of data • Very precise time measurements • Uncertainty comes from:-distance measurement-Do we trust our equipment? • C = (2.978±.03)*108m/s • % Error = .664%

  12. Conclusion • Classical Experiment, New Technology • Accurate, Straightforward Method • %Error < 1% • Speed of light = speed of propagation of Maxwell’s EM waves! • We can now test predictions of relativity

More Related