400 likes | 1.3k Views
Social Research Methods. observation. Why would you use observation?. Covert observation. Non-Participant observation. Participant observation. Overt observation. Participant Observation. Researcher joining in with the group or community they are studying.
E N D
Covert observation Non-Participant observation Participant observation Overt observation
Participant Observation Researcher joining in with the group or community they are studying
To develop an understanding of the world from a point of view of the subjects of the research • Gain understanding through understanding people’s meanings • ‘get inside people’s heads’ see the world as they do and how they make sense of it
verstehen Understanding developed through empathy or close identification
Laud Humphreys • ‘Tearoom Trade’ 1970 • Casual sex between men in public toilets • ‘Watch-queen’
William Whyte • ‘Street Corner Society’ (1955) • ‘Cornerville’ • ‘Norton Street Gang’ • Doc
Covert • Conceals true identity as a researcher • To gain access to group and avoid disrupting normal behaviour • Must become a full participant in the group, or run the risk of being found out
Problems with covert role... • May involve participation in illegal or unpleasant activities • Can’t take notes etc without arousing suspicion • Ethical considerations?
Overt • Researcher declares true identity and purpose • Able to ask questions about group or interview people • People are aware being watched (ethics) • Avoid taking part in illegal activities
Problems with overt role... • Effect the behaviour of those being researched Hawthorne effect
Eileen Barker • The Making of a Moonie (1984) • Unification church • Brainwashing?
getting in staying in getting out
Getting in • Credentials William Whyte (1955) Street Corner Society • Poor Italian district in Boston in the 1930s • ‘Doc’
Staying in • Gaining trust and cooperation of those in the group • ‘initially, keep your eyes and ears open but keep your mouth shut’ (Doc to Whyte) • How far to involve yourself? • Criminal behaviour • Whyte: ‘personating’ (illegally voting twice in an election)
Getting out • Leaving the group without damaging relationships • Becoming detached and impartial • Confidentiality • Personal safety (James Patrick: A Glasgow Gang Observed)
Non-Participant Observation observing behaviour without interacting with the participants
Strengths of participant observation • Validity • Insight ‘as I sat and listened, I learned the answers to questions that I would not have had the sense to ask’ (Whyte) • Other methods rely on prior knowledge i.e. What questions to ask
Strengths contd... • Insider’s view (not reflecting priorities of researcher eg. in questionnaires) • Practicality • i.e. Groups closed to outsiders • Criminal/devious groups • Hostile to wider society • Makes joining, participation and obtaining cooperation and trust difficult
Limitations of participant observation • Time, money & personal cost/danger • Loss of objectivity (‘go native’) • Changing behaviour (overt) • Reliability • Personal qualities of researcher • Impossible to replicate • Generalisation • Ethics