230 likes | 378 Views
Is Breast transillumination a viable option for breast cancer screening in resource limited settings?. Elobu Emmanuel, MD (Dar), MMed Surgery(MUK) FCS (ECSA) trainee, Registrar Colorectal Surgery Unit Mulago Hopsital. What is the problem?. Breast cancer
E N D
Is Breast transillumination a viable option for breast cancer screening in resource limited settings? ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda Elobu Emmanuel, MD (Dar), MMed Surgery(MUK) FCS (ECSA) trainee, Registrar Colorectal Surgery Unit Mulago Hopsital
What is the problem? • Breast cancer • Common disease(Gakwaya et al) • Rapidly rising incidence(Parkin et al) • low overall survival-56%(Gakwaya et al ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda
Problem cont’d • Prevention • No effective primary prevention(Gakwaya et al) • Secondary prevention is best hope(Prasad et al) • No screening program ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda
Mammography • Internationally accepted effective screening tool(Brittenden, Nelson) • Not feasible for poor resource country like Uganda(Gakwaya et al) • Age limit (> 30 y) • High Cost • Inequitable distribution ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda
Breast transillumination is • Safer (IR vs. Xray) • Cheaper ($150) • easier to use(self exam) • minimal running costs • No age limit • How does it perform in comparison with MG? ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda
Self transillumination ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda
Specific Objective 1 • To determine the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of breast transillumination compared to mammography in the evaluation of breast lumps among Ugandan women at Mulago hospital ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda
Specific Objective 2 • To describe the features of benign and malignant lumps as seen on breast transillumination among Ugandan women in Mulago hospital ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda
results ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda
Participant characteristics ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda
Prevalence from MG=63.2%, transillumination=45.3%. Sensitivity = 63.2%, PPV= 86.8% specificity = 89.5% NPV= 61.2% Comparison of transillumination to mammography ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda
Distribution of the false negative picked up by CBE and MG ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda
Comparison of transillumination characteristics to Histology ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda
distribution of lump sizes by technique of detection, ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda
discussion BT MG • Sensitivity 63.2% • LR 67-95% • Specificity 89.5% • Sensitivity 73.3 % • 63-95% LR • Specificity 98.5% ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda
False negative-36.8% Our study literature • Average size 1.5 cm (range 0.5-4cm) • 61.2% BIRADS II • 50% close to chest wall • Relatively small/thin breasts • Lumps close to chest-SICKLER • Lumps in relatively small breasts CUTLER ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda
CASE FOR LOW COST SCREENING • High burden of disease • Rapidly rising incidence • 77% present in stage III & IV • Peak age 30-39 years • Survival stage • Mammography • Expensive • Inequitably distributed • Excludes women less than 30 yrs ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda
Bold suggestion • Preliminary data shows that BT is possibly comparable to Mammography • Let us rethink breast cancer screening and diagnosis • Get breast transillumiantion off the dusty shelves ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda
limitations • Hospital based study on symptomatic women • Learning curve for breast transillumination • Age limit of 30 years ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda
Recommendations and prospects • Large scale population based evaluation as a screening tool • Evaluate • Sensitivity in asymptomatic population • Intra/inter-observer variability • Acceptability • Grand Challenge Canada application • Please vote!!! ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda
THE END tHaNkyOufOrLiStEnInG ASOU AGM Fort Portal, Uganda