150 likes | 291 Views
North Corridor Commuter Rail The Case For Tax Increment Financing. Mecklenburg County May 2007. North Corridor Commuter Rail Project Snapshot. Project Upgrade of existing tracks on existing right-of-way 10 stations 39 Public Crossings 5 trainsets (420 seats each) Service
E N D
North Corridor Commuter RailThe Case For Tax Increment Financing Mecklenburg County May 2007
North Corridor Commuter RailProject Snapshot • Project • Upgrade of existing tracks on existing right-of-way • 10 stations • 39 Public Crossings • 5 trainsets (420 seats each) • Service • 22 trains per day (Phase 1) • Two-way service • 30-minute headway during rush • Hourly service off-peak • Top Speed: 60-79 mph
North Corridor Commuter RailIgniting The Region’s Economic Engine • 83,000 jobs within ½ mile of North Corridor Stations by 2030 • 10,000 new residential units at planned TODs • $2 billion in identified TOD projects • 250,000 residents within the corridor by 2030 • North Mecklenburg/South Iredell Growth: 179% • 4,600 daily riders • Most riders new to transit • Assumes completion of I-77
The Simple FactsI-77 Headed For Breakdown Lane • Traffic Volume Is Exploding • Interstate -77 • 2007: 87,000 vehicles per day • 2030: 170,000 vehicles per day • Local Trips • 2007: 490,500 • 2030: 1,241,700 • I-77 Expansion A Distant Hope • Cost: $400-600 million in today’s dollars • No funding for design & construction • Completion: 2030 • More I-77 Shutdowns • More than 1,000 traffic accidents on I-77 (Exits 10-42) in 2004
North Corridor Commuter Rail Project Costs & Funding Davidson Mount Mourne Terminus Terminus Project Cost 246 261 Funding State (25%) 62 65 CATS (34%) 84 89 Charlotte Gateway Station 24 24 Iredell County/Mooresville 18 Unfunded 76 66
Leveraging Incremental Tax Revenues To Fund Rail & Local Improvements • Proposal: • Create Tax Increment Finance (TIF) Districts • Use incremental taxes generated within the TIF District to fund cost of rail & other local improvements • Bond Proceeds Would Fund – • Local road, utility & parking improvements to enhance & support transit and downtown development • North Corridor Commuter Rail Station & Crossing Costs • Source of Bonds • TIF (Amendment One) • Local Certifications of Participation (COPS) • Railroad Infrastructure Financing (RIFF)
Justifying The Use of Incremental Tax Revenues • Transit & Local Improvements Generate New Tax Revenue • More multi-family housing (TOD vs. Existing Zoning) • Greater quality & concentration of retail & office • Faster build-out around transit station (3-5 years) • Faster, greater sales tax revenues from construction & commercial activities • TOD property increases value faster than surrounding areas • San Jose: +23% for commercial • Dallas: +39% for residential & 53% for office • Funds Local “Catalyst” Projects With No Near-term Funding Source • Road improvements • Parking • Utility upgrades
Example Of Incremental Tax Revenue Generated By Transit • Griffith Lakes – 70-acre parcel at proposed Harris Station • Plan A: No Transit • 200,000 sq. ft of warehouse • Tax Value: $12 million • Tax revenues: $152,000 per year • Plan B: With Transit • 1,800 homes; 800,000 sq. ft commercial • Tax Value: $610 million • Tax revenues: $7.8 million per year
Example Of Incremental Tax Revenue Generated By Transit • Gandy’s Eastfield Station Project at proposed Eastfield Station • Plan A: No Transit • 460 homes; 25,000 sq. ft commercial • Tax Value: $80 million • Tax revenues: $1,024,000 per year • Plan B: With Transit • 950 homes; 35,000 sq. ft commercial • Tax Value: $158 million • Tax revenues: $2,022,400 per year
Understanding TIF • Bonds issued to fund the transit and catalyst projects • Only incremental taxes – taxes collected in excess of current tax base -- can be used to service bond debt • Only a portion of incremental taxes can be used to pay debt service • Typical TIF: 90-100% or more of taxes used for debt service • North Corridor: 35-50% of new taxes reserved for County services • North Corridor: 20% of new taxes reserved for Town/City services
North Corridor Financial Analysis • Identify TIF Districts Sized To Fund Infrastructure Needs • Analyze Existing Assessed Value of Property Within TIF District • Calculate Future Growth Without Any TIF Investment • As-Of-Right zoning • Existing development plans • National TOD experience • Calculate Future Growth With TIF Investment • Local and adopted plans • TOD projects already underway or planned • Reasonable growth on developable sites • Calculate Bonding Capacity Funded By Incremental Taxes Generated By Future Growth
Building Off Experience • Cherokee Investment Partners • Experienced Master/ Brownfield Developer • Experts in Tax Increment Financing • Significant real estate investments • Major project financing expertise • Cherokee is Helping To: • Quantify future value of the property • Assess availability of TIF to finance rail and local infrastructure needs
Davidson Future Growth Scenario • Current Assessed Value of TIF District • $ 126.8 million • 11.5% of Total Tax Base • Future Build Out • 1,445 residential units • 212,000 sq. ft office • 227,000 sq. ft. retail • Future Assessed Value ($ 2007) • $ 472 million • Incremental Growth Value • $ 345.2 million • Incremental Taxes • $ 2.4 million/year
DavidsonCandidate Projects For Funding • Total Potential Candidate Projects $ 22 million • Rail Improvements ($10 million) • Local CIP Projects • Potts Sloan Area Improvements ($1 million) • Downtown Parking Deck ($6 million) • Downtown Road Improvements ($5 million)
Cornelius Future Growth Scenario • Current Assessed Value of TIF District • $ 32.6 million • 1% of Total Tax Base • Future Build Out • 1,439 residential units • 540,000 sq. ft commercial • Future Assessed Value ($ 2007) • $ 478 million • Incremental Future Value • $ 445.4 million • Incremental Taxes • $2.8 million