1 / 12

Two for One Program Reviews

Two for One Program Reviews. Beth Sumner Assistant Superintendent Trigg County Public Schools Kentucky Association of Assessment Coordinators October 21, 2013. Two for One Deals. External Program Review: District Level

reia
Download Presentation

Two for One Program Reviews

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Two for One Program Reviews Beth Sumner Assistant Superintendent Trigg County Public Schools Kentucky Association of Assessment Coordinators October 21, 2013

  2. Two for One Deals • External Program Review: District Level • An annual external program review is the responsibility of individual school districts to conduct at the end of the school year. • Method is the decision of the district • School Level Review: • The Kentucky Department of Education recommends that schools use a systematic, on-going process to review their programs, reflect on the evidence and use that formative information to improve their Writing, Arts & Humanities, and Practical Living/Career Studies programs.

  3. School Level Reviews • Lead person for each area of Program Review • A&H • PLCS • Writing • K-3 • Committees that work to collect evidence

  4. Evidence Collection • Paper Copies • May be a few samples given to PR Lead • Could be multiple documents in a specific location in the school building • Electronic Copies • Photos/Video clips • Documents stored on network folders • Google Form for Cover sheet • https://drive.google.com/a/trigg.kyschools.us/folderview?id=0BzOPuFX9jRZRT1RFQ2t0RzNuMHc&usp=sharing • Shared among PR Lead and Administrative staff • At a glance, a school can see what evidence has been collected and from specific staff/grade/content areas

  5. District Support • K-12 meeting of Program Review Lead for each area – 3 times per year for ½ day each time (Ideally in Sept/Oct, Dec/Jan, and March) • Purpose is to built consistency across all schools with interpretation of rubrics • Creates collaboration among schools • Team can include teachers, instructional supervisors, G/T Coordinator, Community Educator, College & Career Planner, and principals/assistant principals

  6. 1st Meeting • Review of 2011-12 Scores • Examine areas of strength • Identify areas of growth • Rubric Discussion • Creates similar interpretation of characteristics and vocabulary • Evidence Sampling • Pull same Standard/Demonstrator/Characteristic for all schools and “cross-score” for feedback • Identify Next Steps – StoryBoard • Possible activities/professional development

  7. Rubric Discussion - Writing

  8. Evidence Sampling Standard 1: Curriculum and Instruction

  9. Story Board

  10. 2nd Meeting • Evidence Sampling • As a team (cross-schools), determine the standard/demonstrators/characteristics to review • Look at areas with either low performance or areas of high performance • Discuss rubric for common understanding • Review the evidence provided by school • Determine score and provide feedback • Share results with school representative (verbal sharing) • Team shares with no questions/comments from school • School representative asks questions of team • Identify Common Dilemmas and Solutions

  11. 3rd Meeting • Prior to meeting, each school team will • Have a draft of the Program Review from ASSIST • Evidence sampling repeated • Teams will consider the Next Steps diagnostic and offer recommendations • This meeting will be held in March to provide time for final revisions/changes

  12. Quick Score Tool KDE Cut Scores for 2012-13 Released 10/18/13 0-7 Needs Improvement 8 – 10.7 Proficient 10.8+ Distinguished

More Related