1 / 24

Food Security and Agriculture- Philippines 28 May 2014- Tacloban

Food Security and Agriculture- Philippines 28 May 2014- Tacloban. Agenda. Introduction Presentation of WFP post distribution monitoring results SRP- revision of projects Final FSAC inputs for SRP Risk factors, key recovery priorities & gaps during this transition period (OCHA)

remy
Download Presentation

Food Security and Agriculture- Philippines 28 May 2014- Tacloban

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Food Securityand Agriculture- Philippines28 May 2014- Tacloban

  2. Agenda • Introduction • Presentation of WFP post distribution monitoring results • SRP- revision of projects • Final FSAC inputs for SRP • Risk factors, key recovery priorities & gaps during this transition period (OCHA) • AOB; FSAC structure; Schedule of meetings        

  3. Monitoring results from EMOP 200631: Assistance to the people affected by Super Typhoon Haiyan

  4. The report covers the period: December 2013 to February 2014. It contains the results to date from distribution and post-distribution monitoring of WFP activities: general food distribution, unconditional cash transfers and supplementary feeding programmes. WFP monitoring systems went to lengths to ensure that relief activities did not negatively impact market conditions.

  5. Key findings

  6. Key findings Cash transfers: • Gradual, limited injections of cash was appropriate starting west in Region VI and moving east towards the more severely affected Region VIII to enable a staggered approach facilitating market recovery. • Limited cash injections showed potential to jump-start retail supply capacity and household-level effective demand.

  7. Key findings

  8. Key findings • 93 percent of cash beneficiaries reported access to functioning markets. • Over 96 percent of cash recipients indicated that there was sufficient availability of their preferred foods in those markets.

  9. Key findings

  10. Thank you

  11. FTS SRP projects

  12. FSAC funding status Are the Contributions reports accurate/updated? Are we still appealing for the unfunded activities? Do we need to de-earmark mark some activities? http://fts.unocha.org/reports/daily/ocha_R32_A1043___21_May_2014_(16_38).pdf

  13. SRP -Outputs Data received so far

  14. Output Indicator 1.1.1 - # of individuals receiving food assistance (through general food distribution)

  15. Indicator 1.1.3 - # of persons reached with cash transfers

  16. Output Indicator 3.2.1 - #of affected farmers receiving agricultural inputs

  17. Output Indicator 3.2.4 - # of fisherfolk with boats repaired and built

  18. AOB FSAC structureSchedule of meetings

  19. Updates • New coordinator to Roxas • Tacloban and Roxas- 3 meetings per month • CTWG x1 • FTWG x1 • FSAC general meeting x1 • Manila- one meeting per month

  20. Thank YOU

More Related