190 likes | 284 Views
What is micro four thirds format?. It differs from your DSLR in 2 main ways Mirrorless Smaller sensor What is the goal?. Smaller, lighter. 802 grams. 1400 grams. 1755 grams. Entry level size comparison. What is micro four thirds format?. It differs from your DSLR in 2 main ways
E N D
What is micro four thirds format? • It differs from your DSLR in 2 main ways • Mirrorless • Smaller sensor • What is the goal?
Smaller, lighter 802 grams 1400 grams 1755 grams
What is micro four thirds format? • It differs from your DSLR in 2 main ways • Mirrorless • Smaller sensor • What are the trade-offs?
Mirrorless formats Not unique to m4/3 • All sensor sizes • Compact point and shoots have used it for years • Full frame in Sony Alpha 7 • APS-c in Nex, Fuji etc • Canon EOS M • 4/3 in Olympus and Panasonic • 1 inch in Nikon 1 and Sony RX 100
Mirrorless vs SLR • Getting cheaper to manufacture • Less mechanical complexity • CDAF vs PDAF • Hybrid AF
Life without a mirror • No mirror – no OVF (except “rangefinder”) • Composition on LCD – “Live View” works well for • Inconspicuous shooting, e.g. “street” • Ground level macro • Eye level shots of children • Video • Not so good for most everything else – esp long lenses, action • Electronic (eye level) viewfinder or EVF • Much improved past few yrs • Advantages and disadvantages in use – some prefer EVF
EVF advantage examples • More information presented • Effects of EC visible in real time • Live “blinkies” or histogram • Larger! • OVF size relates to physical size of sensor and of pentaprism • EVF size independent of sensor size
Mirrorless summary • Advantages and disadvantages in use • Permits smaller body regardless of sensor size. • Necessary but not sufficient to produce significantly smaller system.
What is micro four thirds format? • It differs from your DSLR in 2 main ways • Mirrorless • Smaller sensor • What are the trade-offs?
We cannot change the physics of lens optics • We can only shrink the size of the lenses by shrinking the sensor size
Sensor size - a trade-off • Bigger sensor equals better image quality • Better low light performance • Better DOF control • Smaller sensor allows smaller lenses • m4/3 lenses smaller than EF-S or Dx • Low light good enough? • DOF shallow enough? • Micro 4/3 is a compromise in sensor size not greatly different from crop sensor DSLR
M 4/3 summary Hits a sweet spot for balancing image quality against portability for some photography. Travel Hiking Candids
Hands on opportunity • Viewfinder • AF speed • Lens size and selection • Let me swap lenses • Feel free to snap away • Your SD card or mine • Auto ISO set to 1600 max on all cameras • Image stabilization is ON for all
Special features of E-M1 • Incredible IBIS • Weatherproof • Touch screen shutter • MF magnify and focus peaking • Live bulb • Wi-Fi (“remote shutter release on steroids”) • In camera time lapse • HDR auto bracketing • 10 fps (50 frame buffer), 1/8000 • Hybrid AF (CDAF + PDAF)
Micro 4/3 further reading with images Robin Wong RobinWong.blogspot.com • Robin is a blogger from Malaysia who was so enthusiastic about Olympus products that they put him on the payroll last year. He gives fairly non-technical reviews and is a very talented photographer. Ming Theinblog.mingthein.com • Ming is much more technically inclined but also produces great images. He compares many different formats. Michael Reichmann luminous-landscape.com • This well known author/photographer called the Olympus E-M1 the Best New Camera of 2013. • And size comparisons CameraSize.com • Click on the Top view plus lens icon at far right in order to add lenses.