160 likes | 172 Views
This discussion from the 16th Dubrovnik Economic Conference in June 2010 analyzes executive compensation, highlighting the significant wealth accumulation of top CEOs tied to firm performance. Despite the dispersion in earnings, there is no clear trend in CEO compensation, with pay often correlated to stock prices. The implications of capping salaries and bonuses are debated, raising questions about the justification of top CEO salaries and golden handshakes. The paper emphasizes the need for further transparency and cross-country analysis to inform regulatory decisions.
E N D
The facts about executive compensationClementi and Cooley Discussion by Athanasios Vamvakidis 16th Dubrovnik Economic Conference June 2010
Main Contribution: • Takes into account total CEO wealth tied to firm Main Results:
Compensation driven by performance; link has not been weakened over time
A very good paper • Very well written • Clear contributions • Interesting and controversial results • A number of robustness tests
But: • To what extent do compensation schemes take wealth linked to firm into account? • Isn’t the CEOs’ amount of wealth linked to firm also their decision? • Shouldn’t compensation-performance regressions include lags? Can we get results if they do? • How about bubble companies that eventually fail? • Wouldn’t Enron’s CEOs fit the results perfectly • What if profit instead of shareholder gain is on LHS? • Small R2suggests there is a lot we still don’t know Still open issues:
Are top CEO salaries justified? “They rise on the backs, not the shoulders, of those beneath them”, winner in infographic contest sponsored by “Capitalism: a love story”