380 likes | 399 Views
A Practical Approach For Inerting Systems on Commercial Aircraft and the Development of Industry Standards. Presented by Phil Jones & Brian Greenawalt Shaw Aero Devices. History of Recent Commercial Inerting. FAA proposed concepts for practical inerting of commercial aircraft fuel tanks
E N D
A Practical Approach For Inerting Systems on Commercial Aircraft and the Development of Industry Standards Presented by Phil Jones & Brian Greenawalt Shaw Aero Devices
History of Recent Commercial Inerting • FAA proposed concepts for practical inerting of commercial aircraft fuel tanks • Storage of nitrogen enriched air in the ullage of the tank • Use of different flow modes in phases of flight • FAA proposed building of inerting system for 747SP • Team members from FTIHWG • Onboard ground inerting (OBGI) system • Designed for inerting fuel tank as well as cargo fire suppression
System Operation • Engine bleed air • Pressurized air supply • Cooling air • Reduce bleed air temperatures • Filter • Remove contaminants found in bleed air • Heater • Reheats air after run from heat exchanger to prevent condensation • Hollow fiber membrane • Pressure device which reduces the oxygen level in air stream • Dual orifice valve • Changes the back pressure on the hollow fiber membrane • Different flow modes – high flow/low purity, low flow/high purity • Distribution system • Injects nitrogen into tank
Use of OBGI System • Converted to OBIGGS • Used as a flying test bed • Proved concepts • Storage of nitrogen in fuel tank ullage • Dual flow mode • Updating required for integration into commercial aircraft • Pallet style design – space and weight restrictive
Installation Location • FAA 747SP large installation area available • Installation location was central on the aircraft • Benign environment & easily accessible • Relatively few personnel involved and highly aware of program
747SP OBGI System • View from forward looking aft and up • Items visible include OEA permeate bleed manifold, ASM inlets and supporting structure • View from forward looking aft and up • Items visible include inlet door control cable, ASM outlets, supporting structure and NEA termination point
Installation Location • Space availability is rare on smaller aircraft • Large open bays not available • Proximity to the following systems: • Pressurized air – bleed air • Cooling air • Fuel tank • Environmental conditions in location • No all available locations are contained within bays and may be exposed to elements or near high temperature components • May be difficult for maintenance actions • Human safety • NEA leakage into pressurized areas or adjacent bays
Installation Location • System size must be minimized for use in most applications • Installation in close proximity to interface locations a benefit • Less weight required for connections • Location should be chosen for installation environment and ease of maintenance should also be considered • Health and safety of passengers/crew and maintenance personnel must be considered • Potential leak and accumulation of nitrogen gas
Analysis Requirements • Flammability exposure model • Fuel tank thermal model • Inerting system performance model • Aircraft information required • Configuration • Systems performance • Flight details
System Performance • Aircraft configuration • Ullage Volume • Vent configuration • Space availability • Weight • Aircraft OBIGGS interface systems • Bleed air pressure, temperature and flow profile • Cooling air pressure, temperature and flow profile • Maximum NEA flow • Contaminants • Flight details • Climb & descent rate • Cruise altitude & duration • Other issues • Allowable flammability exposure • Reliability requirement • Oxygen concentration
Inerting Performance Model • Inerting performance model throughout flight profile • Receives external aircraft inputs • Bleed air conditions • Cooling air conditions • Uses performance of OBIGGS • Heat exchanger • Filter • Hollow fiber membrane • Dual orifice • In-tank distribution • Calculates conditions within tank • Ullage space • Temperature • Pressure • Result of the model is O2% in the tank • Oxygen concentration in ullage space throughout flight profile
Flammability Exposure Model Flammable Conditions? Inert? Contributes to fleet wide flammability No No No Yes Options: Non-flammable & not inert Non-flammable & inert Flammable & inert Flammable ¬ inert
Flammability Exposure Model • Determines fleet average flammability exposure • Total flammable time divided by the total operating time including ground operations • Flight profile randomly selected • Monitor inputs throughout flight profile • Temperature & pressure conditions in tank – flammable? • Tank ullage oxygen concentration – inert? • OBIGGS performance • Producing required purity and flow of NEA • Reliability – operating? • Flammable time during flight profile adds to fleet wide exposure • Time flammable conditions exist and tank is not inert • Process is restarted until number of flights representative of fleet usage is reached
System Performance & Analysis • Flammability exposure analysis • Fuel tank conditions • Temperature • Pressure • Fuel vapor content • Oxygen concentration • Inerting system performance • Purity & flow rate of NEA • Reliability of inerting system • Total flammable time (when flammable and not inert) divided by the total operating time including ground operations
Modular Inerting System • Current system • Pallet system requires large installation area • Extra weight • Pallet-airframe mounting & component-pallet mounting • Pallet structure & component housing • Ducting runs between components • Interstitial heater • Approach not acceptable for narrow body aircraft • Space availability • Weight penalty • New configuration required for each aircraft
Modular Inerting System • Modular inerting system • Package all major components in one housing • Hollow fiber membrane • Filter • Heat exchanger • Individual housings & mountings not required • Modular housing replaces need for tubing runs between components • Close communication between heat exchanger and hollow fiber membrane removes need for interstitial heater • Same Shaw Aero patented “Module” interchangeable across aircraft • Single aisle requires 1 module, twin aisle requires 3 modules • Single & twin aisle module interchangeable - Stock 1 module part number
Modular Inerting System • Reduced weight over distributed components • Removal of interstitial heater • Fits within space availability of smaller aircraft • One common designed component that is used across many aircraft
Health Monitoring • System required to measure the health of the inerting system • Options include: • Measurement of O2 in-tank • Measurement of O2 from inerting system • Measurement of flow of NEA from inerting system
Health Monitoring • Current oxygen sensors • Test bed measurement of O2% in tank accomplished with FAA system • Sensors have a short life • Equipment requires large space availability • Commercially available oxygen sensors cannot be placed in tank • Sensing elements superheat sample, that may contain fuel vapors • Measurement of O2% of NEA stream prior to tank infers tank O2% • Purity of NEA produced by inerting system • Should be used in conjunction with flow sensor • Tight measurement tolerances required • Failures in the following systems will not be detected • NEA distribution • Tank vent system • Previous flight assumed inert
Health Monitoring • Non-oxygen sensing methods • Measure pressure or flow downstream of inerting system • Latent hollow fiber membrane failures not detected • Measure O2% of inerting system with GSE at lengthy intervals • Tank O2% should be measured • Tank O2 level measured directly by sampling a few times during the flight at critical tank location • Not inferred – total loop closure • Can we reduce the life cycle costs of the inerting system?
Health Monitoring • Current sensing methods are: • Too large • Not compatible with environment • Flawed • Currently working on developing system that will measure the O2% in-tank
Industry Standards • Industry standards are needed to define • System performance • System design
Industry Standards • AIA Document • Defines problem tanks • Methods of defining flammability • Sets flammability exposure limits • Fleet wide average levels • Special case of 80°F days • Methods of reducing flammability • Managing heat transfer • Displacing the flammable zone • Ullage sweeping • Inerting • Foam • Monte Carlo Analysis • Document submitted to FAA
Industry Standards • SAE • Group made up of cross-section from two SAE groups • AE-5 Aerospace Fuel, Oil and Oxidizer Systems • AC-9 Aircraft Environmental Systems • Document encompases commercial and military aircraft • Background • Requirements • System Design • Validation & Verification
Industry Standards • Background • Lessons learned • Gasses used • Definition of inert • Requirements • Types of aircraft • Fuels • Environmental conditions
Industry Standards • System Design • Architectures • Air sources • Distribution methods • Tank types • Performance • Impact to and from other systems • System Control and monitoring • Analysis methods • Installation • RMTS • Validation & Verification
Industry Standards • AIA document submitted to FAA • SAE document currently in progress
The Fourth Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference The Fourth Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference