330 likes | 493 Views
The Economic Causes and Consequences of Conflict: Where the literature stands and where we should go from here. EITM Lecture – PART 2 July 8, 2011 Prof. Oeindrila Dube . Aid and conflict. Discussion:. What are potential theoretical channels through which aid may affect conflict?.
E N D
The Economic Causes and Consequences of Conflict:Where the literature stands and where we should go from here EITM Lecture – PART 2 July 8, 2011 Prof. Oeindrila Dube
Discussion: What are potential theoretical channels through which aid may affect conflict?
Theoretical channels Economic benefits lower grievances/ raise opportunity cost of fighting Less conflict Aid State stronger Less conflict More gains from predation More conflict Leakage or mis-targeting More conflict
Challenge to Identification • Selection • Aid allocated toward good performers upward bias • Aid allocated toward “basket cases” downward bias
Aiding Violence or Peace?(De Ree and Nillesen, 2009) • Does development aid affect likelihood of conflict? • In Sub-Saharan Africa • Empirical strategy: • Instrument for aid flow using average donor country GDP • Results • Aid reduces the duration of conflict • Aid has no significant effect on probability of conflict onset
Aid under Fire: Development Projects and Civil Conflict Crost and Johnston (2010)
Overview • Does participation in major community driven development program affect violence? • Within country analysis • Philippines, 2003-2008 • Regression discontinuity design • Within each province poorest 25% of municipalities eligible for a major community driven development program • Running variable: distance of poverty ranking from eligibility threshold
Feeding Conflict:The Unitended Consequences of U.S. Food Aid on Civil War Qian and Nunn (2011)
Overview • What is the effect of U.S. wheat aid on conflict? • 121 recipient countries, over 1967 – 2004 • Empirical strategy • Instrument U.S. wheat aid with weather in conditions in U.S. wheat producing regions • Interact wheat aid with average probability country receives food aid
First-stage Second-stage
2SLS estimates of the effect of U.S. Wheat Aid on the Probability of Conflict
Potential mechanisms • Increased value of the state • Diversion of food aid to armed groups • Alternative mechanism: price effects?
Evidence of military aid diversion(Dube and Naidu, 2010) • Rise in U.S. military found to increase paramilitary violence in Colombia • Consistent with diversion since • U.S. military aid goes to the Colombian military, which is stationed in regions with bases • U.S. military aid leads to more attacks in base regions by paramilitary groups (aligned with the Colombian military) • No equivalent increase in attacks by guerilla groups
Taking stock of the aid-conflict literature • Mixed results • Opposite effects of development aid within vs. across country • Food and military aid found to increase conflict • Little on understanding why • Conflict reducing effects: opportunity cost vs. state capacity? • Conflict promoting effects: diversion, prize, strategic reasons? • Different effects based on aid type? • Government, foreign govt./military, NGO disbursement • Project vs. program aid
Several recent papers show null effects • No effect of civil war on consumption, school enrollment or nutrition in Sierra Leone (Bellows and Miguel, 2006 and 2009) • Higher participation in collective action and political participation • No effect of bombings on long run poverty in Vietnam (Miguel and Roland , 2010)
Compared to non-bombed areas, bombed areas did NOT have lower… Local poverty rates Consumption levels Infrastructure Literacy Population density
Doesn’t necessarily imply war was economically inconsequential • Compares districts within Vietnam • National growth rate may have been faster in the absence of war • Government investment/foreign aid could have gone to other, non-bombed regions • Private foreign investment may have been greater if it were not a post-conflict country
Profiting from conflict • Event study methodology to show beneficial effects of conflict on firms • Stock returns of partly nationalized corporations increased during covert coups (Dube, Kaplan and Naidu, forthcoming) • Diamond company stock returns declined with end of Angolan civil war (Guidolin and La Ferrara, 2008)
What “benefits” did war confer to diamond companies? • Entry barriers for other diamond companies were higher • Bargaining power of Angolan government lower • Licensing and rent-seeking costs for incumbent firms lower • Lower transparency standards permitted more profitable dealings
Taking stock • Micro results point to interesting compositional effects • Micro data may not enable us to capture net effects of conflict on economic performance • Counterfactual hard to establish with cross-regional comparisons • Firm event studies are essentially case studies
Way forward on examining economic consequences of conflict • Literature lacks an identified cross-country analysis of how conflict affects economic performance • Large returns to having the first good instrument • More interesting to show conditions under which there are positive and negative effects • For within or cross-country analysis • Particularly since micro studies show both effects possible
References • Bellows, John and Ted Miguel. 2006. “War and Institutions: New Evidence from Sierra Leone” African Economic Development 96(2). • Bellows, John and Ted Miguel. 2006. “War Local Collective Action in Sierra Leone” Journal of Public Economics, 2009, 93(11-12), 1144-1157 • Besley, Tim and TorstenPersson. 2010. “The Logic of Political Violence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. • Collier, Paul and AnkeHoeffler. “Greed and Grievance in Civil Wars” Oxford Economic Papers Oxford Economic Papers (2004): 563-595 • Collier and AnkeHoeffler, “On Economic Causes of Civil War,” October 1998, 50, 563–73. • Collier, Paul and AnkeHoeffler “Greed and Grievance in CivilWar,” Oxford Economic Papers, 2004, 56 (4), 563–95. • Crost, Benjamin and Patrick Johnston. “Aid Under Fire: Development Projects and Civil conflict.” Mimeo, Harvard Kennedy School. • De Ree, Jopp and EleonoraNillesen. 2009. “Aiding Violence or Peace? The Impact of foreign aid on the risk of conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Journal of Development Economics. 88: 301-313. • Dube, Oeindrila and Juan Vargas. “Commodity Price Shocks and Civil Conflict: Evidence from Colombia.” Mimeo, NYU.
References • Dube, Oeindrila and Suresh Naidu. “Bases, Bullets and Ballots: the Impact of U.S. Military Aid on Political Conflict in Colombia.” Mimeo, NYU. • Fearon, James and David D. Laitin, “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War,” American Political Science Review 2003, 97 (1), 75–90. • Guidolin, M. and E. La Ferrara (2007), “Diamonds are forever, Wars are not. Is conflict bad forprivate firms?” American Economic Review, 97(5), 1978-93. • Miguel, Ted, Shanker Satyanath and Ernest Sergenti . 2004. “Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: An Instrumental Variables Approach.” Journal of Political Economy. 112(4): 725-733. • Miguel, Ted and Shanker Satyanath. Forthcoming. “Re-examining economic Shocks and Civil Conflict.” AEJ-Applied. • Miguel, Ted and Gerard Roland. The Long Run Impact of Bombing Vietnam. Journal of Development Economics (forthcoming). • Qian, Nancy and Nathan Nunn. “ Feeding Conflict: the Unintended Consequences of Food Aid on Civil War.” Mimeo, Yale University. • Yanagizawa-Drott, David, “Propaganda and Conflict: Theory and Evidence from the Rwandan Genocide,” 2010. Working Paper, Harvard University.