1 / 29

Where We Go Wrong In Distillation Towers

Where We Go Wrong In Distillation Towers. Dick Hawrelak Presented to ES317Y in 1999 at UWO. Introduction. 3% of large property damage losses are caused by failures in process towers. Average Trended Loss was $53.8MM, the largest of all unit operations. Distillation Tower Problems.

reynold
Download Presentation

Where We Go Wrong In Distillation Towers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Where We Go Wrong In Distillation Towers Dick Hawrelak Presented to ES317Y in 1999 at UWO

  2. Introduction • 3% of large property damage losses are caused by failures in process towers. • Average Trended Loss was $53.8MM, the largest of all unit operations.

  3. Distillation Tower Problems • The following list of problems have been drawn from my personal experience as a design engineer with Dow Chemical for 33 years (1960 - 1993).

  4. Poor Mass Balances • Normal mass balance. • Start-up, shut down or upset. • Re-run of off-spec material.

  5. Tower Variables • Poor understanding of tower variables, reflux, downcomers, reboilers, condensers. • VLE data can be confusing and misleading during design. • Tower configuration not the best - Seadrift tower explosion kills one operator.

  6. Tower Controls • Process controls not adequate for upset conditions. • Often dual level controls are required on bottoms of towers.

  7. Reboilers • Poor reboiler selection. • High rate of fouling due to high steam temperatures. • Reboiler stall due to loss of level in tower - Seadrift tower explosion. • Reboiler lines too small and choke recirculation.

  8. Condensers • Pressure drops higher than design due to fouling. • Hydrates form and plug condenser. • Entrainment from tower not considered in design. • Inerts blanket condenser, failure to remove heat cause PSVs to blow.

  9. VCM Upset

  10. VCM Process

  11. VCM mb

  12. HCL Dispersion

  13. VCM Dispersion

  14. Mechanical Design of Tall Towers • Tower shell thickness not suitable to prevent sway in high winds, tower topples.

  15. Impurities In Tower Feed • Impurities not considered in design, exothermic reaction destroys tower - Seadrift

  16. Flammable Inventory • Designers specify excessive inventory in reflux drum when tower logistics not well understood. • Large bottoms inventory may promote formation of unwanted polymerization products.

  17. Tower Operation at Low Rates • Ballast tray units experience high rate of wear due to low unit reference. Broken valves plug downcomers or end up in pump suction causing further upsets.

  18. Vacuum Operation • Designers too optimistic about air leakage. Vacuum pump or steam jets too small to pull required vacuum. • Poor management of pressure drop.

  19. Recessed Sumps On Trays • Vendors often specify recessed sumps to save 6 inches on tower diameter. • Recessed sumps are perfect traps to collect solids and plug downcomers.

  20. Packed Towers • Poor vapor and liquid distribution affects HETP. Dow wins $3MM lawsuit. • Vendors predict high HETP over wide range of flow. Customers beware. • Poor rangeability in packed tower operation.

  21. Data Collection • Grab samples not suitable to check tower performance. • Require sample range over 24 hour period. • Troubleshooting difficult because of poor instrumentation.

  22. Tower Internals • Flashing tower feeds not considered in feed tray design. • Feed distributors do not work. • Demisters often required but are ignored. • Vortex breakers omitted in tower bottoms.

  23. Tower Optimization • Select a process sequence. • Mass balances to match product specs. • Thermal condition of the feed. • Minimum reflux ratio. • Minimum no. of trays. • No. trays versus reflux ratio.

  24. Optimization Cont’d • Feed tray location. • Tray efficiency. • Valve tray tower design. • Select tower internals. • Repeat optimization for a packed tower.

  25. UC Configuration

  26. Dow Configuration

  27. Previous Exam Problem • The students were presented a paper on Union Carbide’s Seadrift, Texas, EO tower explosion. They were asked to comment on the explosion with respect to what they had learned in this safety course.

  28. Other Possible Exam Questions • Why do designers often specify abnormally large flammable inventory in the reflux drum? • Why should the designer minimize the reboiler steam temperature in a flammable distillation tower? • What are the main problems with packed towers?

  29. Summary • This short list is indicative of some of the problems caused by poor engineering discipline in distillation tower design. • Recommend you obtain a copy of the Chemical Plant Design programs and follow the procedures built into the spreadsheets.

More Related