Chapter 1 - Introduction

1. Chapter 1 - Introduction • What are the issues of the day? • Why does national security pose special legal problems? • What are past abuses of national security law? • What are current practices that may be seen as abuses in the future?

2. Wisdom v. Legality • What did de Tocqueville mean when he said that Americans confused the question of the existence of a power with the wisdom of its use? • Should these be distinguished?

3. How is national security law like public health law? • How do the problems of federal national security law resemble the problems of state public health law? • Why was this parallel especially strong when the Constitution was written? • What modern concerns bring back these same issues?

4. Chapter 2 - Providing for the ‘‘Common Defense’’: The Original Understanding • How were most countries governed in the 1400s? • What were the justifications for this form of government? • What did the legal philosophers argue were better forms of government? • Why was separation of powers key to these arguments?

5. The Nature of War • What is the history of war? • Politics by other means? • What is Formal War? • What is Informal War? • Why does Informal War pose much more difficult issues for international affairs and international law?

6. What is the role of the state v. private parties? • What were letters of marque and reprisal? • Are wars waged by private parties now? • What is the role of private contractors and mercenaries in Iraq? • What additional issue are posed by mercenaries?

7. The Colonial experience • How were the colonies governed? • How much control did England really exercise over day to day affairs? • What was the colonial experience with standing armies? • What are the risks of a standing army?

8. Independence • What was the legal status of the colonies when they declared independence? • The Continental Congress • How was the country governed between independence and the Articles of Confederation? • What was the fundamental flaw in this system? • Why did it almost cost us the revolution?

9. The Articles of Confederation • What was the role of the states versus the federal government in the Articles of Confederation? • Why did this make it difficult to govern the country? • What external threats were still facing the US? • Did we control the continent? • Were the European powers at peace?

10. The Constitution • How did the drafters deal with the problems seen during the Continental Congress era? • What was the relationship between the states and the federal government in the original Constitution? • How were powers shared? • What were the founders expectations about the federal government? • How did the shape the Constitution?

11. Federal Separation of Powers • Three Branches of Government • Legislative • Judicial • Executive • How was separation of powers to protect the nation? • Did the founders anticipate having two branches controlled by the same political party?

12. Then Versus Now • How has the federal government changed? • What are the critical periods for this change? • Why does this pose Constitutional problems?

13. War in the Constitution • Why is the nature of war as understood by the drafters important? • What does this tell us about the congressional power to declare war? • Is this separate from the power to wage war? • What about defensive war? • Why is defensive war a special philosophical and religious issue?

14. Organization of the Military • What fundamental change in the organization of the military was not anticipated by the drafters and which undermines the Constitutional control of war making? • Why does it matter that the congress can now allow a war to be started without having to do it themselves?

15. Review of Constitutional Provisions • Congress - Article I, Section 8 • http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/adlaw/constitution.htm#con1.8.11 • President - Article II, Section 2 • http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/adlaw/constitution.htm#con2.2 • Ambiguous - Habeas Corpus - Article I, Section 9 • http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/adlaw/constitution.htm#con1.9.2

16. Chapter 3 - The Gloss of History: An Introduction to the Separation of National Security Powers

17. Learning Objectives • Does the provision of a statutory process implicitly disapprove alternative processes? • How do we make sense of multiple opinions based on different assumptions? • Is Youngstown strong precedent, or just a case driven by special facts? • What do post 9/11 events tell us about current meaning of Youngstown?

18. The Korean War • Map of Korea and the Military Intrusions • Did the US declare war? • What was the role of the UN? • What is the historical significance of this response? • Is the war popular in 1952? • How well did it work out? • What is the current status of North Korea?

19. Truman • How did Truman become president? • What was famous about his 1948 reelection? • How popular was he? • Why should this matter? • Is there a parallel with the current national security cases before the court? • This case took place in 1952 • Why might that be important?

20. Background of the Seizure • Why is steel production a national security issue? • What factors might influence this analysis? • What did the court know from the papers that might have affected their decision? • What prompted Truman to seize the mills?

21. Legal Framework • Did Congress authorize the seizure of the steel industry? • Who is expected to bear the cost of the seizure and operate the mills?

22. The Taft-Hartley Act • What is the history of strikes and the role of the government that underlies the Taft-Hartley Act? • What can the president do under the Act to deal with a strike? • Does this provision amount to an implicit rejection of other interventions, such as injunctions? • What is your reasoning?

23. Review of Executive Branch Orders • Executive orders (Youngstown) • National Security Decision Directive - NSDD • Presidential Decision Directives - NDD • What is the difference between Executive Orders and NSDDs? • Are NSDDS reviewed by the attorney general? • Are the published?

24. The Seizure • What administrative law device did the president use to seize the mills? • Who did the president tell to operate the mills? • Who is opposing the president's order? • Did they cooperate in operating the mills? • What would the president's recourse if they had not? • How did the district court rule on their injunction against the seizure?

25. Analyzing Divided Opinions • Do not look just at the bottom line of each opinion • Look at the individual issues the judges discuss • Are there some issues where the majority and the dissent agree? • Look at the assumptions the judges use • If you slightly change the assumptions, does the majority shift? • Might Frankfurter have ruled differently earlier in the war?

26. Justice Black • What sort of constitutional analyst was Black? • Is he sympathetic to implied powers? • What was he looking for to justify the president's action? • What about the Defense Production Act? • Why didn't Truman use it? • Did Black find authority?

27. Justice Frankfurter • What is the significance of the Labor Management Relations Act to Frankfurter? • Does it end the question in his mind? • Would he allow the president to use powers beyond on those in the Constitution if it were a long standing practice that was not specifically banned by Congress?

28. Does the Nature of the War Matter to Frankfurter? • Why is this seizure different from those in WW II? • Is this a disagreement with Black? • What is the danger of this analysis? • Under this theory, who has to change the law?

29. Justice Douglas • How does Douglas characterize the seizure? • What would the president have to do to make it legal? • Why can't he do this? • Why does he say this statement is an unavoidable part of separation of powers?

30. Justice Jackson Three Classes of Presidential Action • Acting pursuant to the direction of Congress • Acting where Congress was silent • Acting where Congress has disallowed the action • What does Jackson say determines the legality of the action in this case?

31. Judicial Deference (Chevron)? • What level of deference does Jackson say the court should give when the president is acting against the will of Congress? • How does this look like Black's analysis? • What does the Solicitor General claim is the legal authority? • Does this sound familiar? • What does Jackson think of this?

32. Congressional Power • Does Jackson believe that Congress could seize the mills? • What constitutional provision would he use? • How would Jackson limit the notion of Commander in Chief? • How does Jackson think the President is trying to use his power over foreign affairs to leverage his domestic powers? • What prophetic statement does Jackson make about Congress is a crisis? • Is this a realistic fear? • What examples have you seen since 9/11?

33. Justice Burton • Is Justice Burton comfortable with expansive presidential powers in an emergency? • Why does he not grant them in this case? • Did the subsequent effects of the strike support his view? • Should judges be deciding what is an emergency? • If not, what is the check on presidential power? • Is this an emergency?

34. Justice Clark • Is he sympathetic to "extra constitutional" powers? • What does he mean when quotes Lincoln: • is it possible to lose the nation and yet preserve the constitution? • Is the reverse also possible? • Why does he reject the president's power here? • Do you think he was also affected by the belief that this was not really a crisis?

35. The Dissent - Vinson, Reed, and Minton • Does the dissent take a different view of the level of crisis? • Why? • The dissent points to the Price Stabilization Act that was in force at the time as limiting the president's power to grant price increases to allow the mills to pay the worker's more. • How do they say this allows him to act against the implicit direction of the Labor act to not use injunctions and seizures? • Why are they not worried about this leading to dictatorship? • What is the constraint they see on the president's actions? • Why is the Labor Relations Act this legislation?

36. Congressional Inaction • How can the president make law by "going first"? • What are the reasons for congressional inaction? • Do they all equally support president action?

37. What Constitutes Congressional Acquiescence? • Does it matter if Congress considers the matter after the president acts and still does not pass legislation? • What if they pass legislation on the topic and do not address the president's actions • What if this has been going on for a long time, since the early Congress? • Why does acquiescence by the early Congress matter more? • Does it matter if the president's action is Constitutional gloss, i.e., something that is not contemplated by the Constitution, as opposed to just something that Congress has not thought of? • What if it is forbidden by the Constitution?

38. Dames & Moore v. Regan, 453 US 654 (1981) • What was the Iranian hostage crisis? • What did President Carter have to agree to as a condition of the hostages being released? • What specific power does the International Emergency Economic Powers Act give the president that was used as part of the resolution of these claims.

39. Legal Authority • What did Carter do that the court found was not specifically authorized by any statute? • What legal authority did Congress give the president to resolve claims against foreign governments? • Did Congress review President Carter's actions? • Did Congress take any action to counter the President's actions? • Why does the court say this inaction is acquiescence? • How are claims against the states and federal government handled? • Is there any international law right to private claims against states?

40. Private Claims Affecting Foreign Policy • Should private claims be allowed against foreign governments? • How can these effect diplomacy? • What about prosecutions of heads of state?

41. The President's Emergency Powers Post Youngstown • What are examples of emergency powers that were used post 9/11? • Does Youngstown pose a real obstacle to presidential emergency powers?

42. Public Citizen v. DOJ (Advisory Committee Act and Judicial Appointments) • Kennedy separates the cases into those that involve a clear conflict with constitutional allocation of powers between the branches and those that do not. • He says there should be no compromise when the constitution clearly allocates a power to one branch, but there must be when the authority is ambiguous. • The pardons clause is an example of a power that is exclusively the presidents and would brook no interference from Congress. • Does the advisory committee act affect the president's appointment's power? • Kennedy thought it did and that it violated the Appointment's Clause • Does this give us any additional information about Youngstown?

43. Chapter 4 - The President’s National Security Powers

44. Learning Objectives • What is a delegation question? • Why does the court have different standards for delegation of foreign versus domestic powers. • What is the "sole organ" doctrine? • Should there be a different standard for foreign affairs than domestic governance, and why?

45. US v Curtis Wright, 299 US 304 (1936) • What is the procedural posture of this case? • Check the full text if you are not sure • What are the defendants accused of? • Why do they want the congressional delegation of power declared unconstitutional? • This is 1936 - what other delegation doctrine cases are before the court? • How does Chadha affect the use of joint resolutions? • What can they be used for that has legal force?

46. Bolivia • What is the Monroe Doctrine? • Why did we care about Bolivia? • What is going on in Bolivia and how does the joint resolution address it? • Is this the only time were involved with Central and South America?

47. The Joint Resolution • Where do the underlying events take place, in or outside the US? • Does this court see this a foreign affairs issue? • Why is that critical? • Think of what else is going on with the delegation doctrine at this time

48. The Delegated Powers • What findings does the president have to do to make under the joint resolution? • What does he have to do with the findings to trigger the joint resolution? • What penalties does the law provide? • Why do the penalties have to come from Congress? • Why is an issue at Guantanamo?

49. The Presidential Declaration Now, therefore, I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States of America, acting under and by virtue of the authority conferred in me by the said joint resolution of Congress, do hereby declare and proclaim that I have found that the prohibition of the sale of arms and munitions of war in the United States to those countries now engaged in armed conflict in the Chaco may contribute to the reestablishment of peace between those countries, and that I have consulted with the governments of other American Republics and have been assured of the cooperation of such governments as I have deemed necessary as contemplated by the said joint resolution; and I do hereby admonish all citizens of the United States and every person to abstain from every violation of the provisions of the Joint Resolution above set forth, hereby made applicable to Bolivia and Paraguay, and I do hereby warn them that all violations of such provisions will be rigorously prosecuted.

50. Constitutional Allocation of Powers • In this court's analysis, who held the domestic powers between the Declaration of Independence and the signing of the Constitution? • Who held the foreign powers during this period? • What does this mean for the transfer of powers in the Constitution?