Download
1 / 42
420 likes | 433 Views
Review of departmental performance against set targets for Q3 of 2014/15 financial year, covering administration, geospatial services, rural development, restitution, and land reform.
E N D
DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND LAND REFORM’S 3RD QUARTER PERFORMANCE REPORT: 2014-2015 FINANCIAL YEARPRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND LAND REFORMDATE : 4 MARCH 2015
PRESENTATION OUTLINE • Introduction • Overall Programme Performance per Programme • Programme 1: Administration • Programme 2: Geospatial and Cadastral Services • Programme 3: Rural Development • Programme 4: Restitution • Programme 5: Land Reform • Conclusion
INTRODUCTION • The presentation covers the organizational programme performance for the third quarter of the 2014/15 financial year in line with the five (5) programmes of the Department. • Performance recorded over the period under review is compared against the targets set in the 2014/15 Annual Performance Plan (APP).
COMPARISON OF DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE DURING Q3 IN THE PAST 3 FINANCIAL YEARS • The department performance declined in the period under review to 24% compared to 44% achieved in 2013/14 and 30% in 2012/2013 .
THIRD QUARTER PERFORMANCE: 2014/15 Departmental Performance = No. of targets achieved x 100 Total no of targets set Therefore, the Department achieved 24% of its quarter 3 planned APP targets and 37% cumulatively.
PROGRAMME PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Departmental Performance = No. of targets achieved x 100 Total no of targets set Therefore, the Department achieved 24% of its planned targets as per the Annual Performance Plan during the quarter under review.
TOTAL DEPARTMENTAL PROJECTS ALIGNED TO STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES This graph illustrates that 1975 of the 1991 projects captured on EPM Live are aligned to the departmental strategic objectives. Of the above total 1991, a total of 290 are at Pre-Project, 328 Start-up, 1091 are at Execution, 60 are at closure & 164 Unknown.
Overall Performance Rating The programme had 4 targets planned for implementation in the period reviewed no targets was achieved and 4 were partially achieved. Performance = No. of targets achieved x 100 Total no of targets Therefore, the programme achieved 0% of its Quarter 4 planned APP targets and 0% cumulatively.
Overall Performance Rating The programme had 3 targets planned for implementation in the period reviewed, 1 target was achieved, 1 partially achieved and 1 was not achieved. Performance = No. of targets achieved x 100 Total no of targets Therefore, the programme achieved 33% of its Quarter 3 planned APP targets and 67% cumulatively.
Overall Performance Rating The programme had 12 targets planned for implementation in the period reviewed, 2 targets were achieved, 3 were partially achieved and 7 were not achieved. Performance = No. of targets achieved x 100 Total no of targets Therefore, the programme achieved 17% of its Quarter 3 planned APP targets and 38% cumulatively.
Overall Performance Rating The programme had 4 targets planned for implementation in the period reviewed, 1 of the target was achieved , 2 were partially achieved and 1 was not achieved. Performance = No. of targets achieved x 100 Total no of targets Therefore, the programme achieved 25% of its Quarter 3 planned APP targets and 60% cumulatively.
Overall Performance Rating The programme had 5 targets planned for implementation in the period reviewed, 2 of the targets were achieved, 2 was partially achieved and 1 was not achieved . Performance = No. of targets achieved x 100 Total no of targets Therefore, the programme achieved 40% of its Quarter 3 planned APP targets and 40% cumulatively.
Overall Performance Rating The programme had 5 targets planned for implementation in the period reviewed, 2 of the targets were achieved and 3 were not achieved. Performance = No. of targets achieved x 100 Total no of targets Therefore, the programme achieved 40% of its Quarter 1 planned APP targets and 20% cumulatively.
Overall Performance Rating Land Reform (LTA&LRD) The Programme had 10 targets planned for implementation in the period reviewed, 4 targets were achieved, 2 targets were partially achieved and 4 targets were not achieved. Performance = No. of targets achieved x 100 Total no of targets Therefore, Overall for programme 5 achievement is 40% of its targets set for the quarter under review and 30% cumulatively.
PROGRAMME PERFORMANCE SUMMARY • A total of 33 targets were planned for the 3rd quarter: 8targets were achieved , this translates to 24% performance rating. • Expenditure for the period 01 April 2014 to 31 December 2014 is at 71.1%. This is indicative of 3,9% under-spending by the Department. Table 1 : 3rd Quarter non-financial performance per programme ( APP indicators)
