1 / 23

Correlated Mutations and Co-evolution

Correlated Mutations and Co-evolution. May 1 st , 2002. What is Co-evolution (Correlated Mutation)?. Individual regions of proteins interact Regions can be either on the same chain or on different chains (complexes)

rgrenier
Download Presentation

Correlated Mutations and Co-evolution

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Correlated Mutations and Co-evolution May 1st, 2002

  2. What is Co-evolution (Correlated Mutation)? • Individual regions of proteins interact • Regions can be either on the same chain or on different chains (complexes) • A mutation in one half of the pair induces a change in the other half of the pair • “the tendency of positions in proteins to mutate co-ordinately” Pazos et. al. 1997

  3. “Correlated Mutations Contain Information about Protein-protein interactions” Pazos et. al. 1997 • A possible aid to the “docking” problem, using only sequence information • Docking: The process by which protein domains interact with one another  fitting

  4. Methodology The correlation coefficient • S is the similarity between residues at the positions i/j of type k versus l • Arbitrarily chosen cutoff M predicted contacts (greatest L/2 values) i.e. M=L/2

  5. The Harmonic Average (Xd) • Measure of “correlatedness” • Pic percentage of correlated pairs with that distance, Pia for all pairs

  6. Comparisons of Correlations

  7. Docking solutions test • Note: larger percentages imply worse performance • Special mention of 2gcr and 3adk • “sequence information does not seem to be sufficient to discriminate”

  8. Figure 5: Scatter plot of Xd vs RMS distance 9pap Hemoglobin 1hbb

  9. Prediction: Hsc70 • Figure 6: predicted contacts of Nt and Ct domains of Hsc70 • Could be verified experimentally

  10. Coevolving Protein Residues: Maximum Likelihood and Relationship to Structure. Pollock et. al 1999 • Using size and charge characteristics to define co-evolution (correlation) • Negative Correlation: Correlation due to differences in charge (and thus also coevolution)

  11. The Markov process model (simulated evolution) • Two states, A and a • Equation 1, the probability of transitioning state • λ rate parameter • π equilibrium frequency

  12. Use of parameters in model • Basic model for how they simulate evolutionary steps

  13. Likelihood Test Characteristic (LR) • LI and LD maximum likelihood values for independent and dependent model • Method of determining whether dependence is statistically significant

  14. Test of Significance (LR values for change in parameters)

  15. Myoglobin • Used structure of myoglobin; compared differences in sequences • Variety of species used for sequence information; sperm whale 3D protein structure

  16. LR distributions for myoglobin: size and charge • Note the large negative correlation LR values in charge

  17. Co-evolution of Proteins with their Interaction Partners, Goh et. al. 2000 • Applied to PGK • Chemokines

  18. What is PGK?

  19. Methodology • Two independent sequence alignments, for N and C regions, using PSI-BLAST • ClustalW to create distance matrix between complete domains • To determine correlation, used equation below • X and Y correspond to domains; r a measure of relatedness between these domains

  20. PGK correlations

  21. Chemokines • Role of chemokines; importance in immunity (HIV, cancer) • Four categories, mean nothing to me

  22. Clustering of Chemokines

  23. Clustering of Chemokine receptors

More Related