170 likes | 180 Views
Explore the impact and benefits of corequisite English courses in community colleges, with insights and success stories from leading educators. Learn about the significant increase in completion rates and equity improvements for Black and Hispanic students. Discover the positive outcomes of scaling up corequisites and its impact on student success, enrollment, and achievement. Join the discussion on transforming remedial education through innovative approaches for a more inclusive and effective learning environment.
E N D
If it Works, Scale it UP!Next Steps for ALP Innovations: The League for Innovation in the Community College March 20, 2016
Who We Are • Peter Adams, Community College of Baltimore County • Mark Blaauw-Hara, North Central Michigan College • Jennifer Ernst, Henry Ford College • Jenny Schanker, Michigan Center for Student Success
Corequisite • Corequisite • Fun facts: • The first recorded use of “corequisite” was in 1948 • It is in the bottom 40% of words for popularity • Slightly more popular than “obnubilate” • Neither of those words is in Microsoft’s dictionary
Students enrolled in single-semester, corequisite English courses typically succeeded at twice the rate of students enrolled in traditional prerequisite English courses [in Colorado, Indiana and Tennessee] (Complete College America, 2015) . These changes [including the addition of corequisite courses] contributed to a doubling of one-year college math completion rates (from 8% to 18%) and an almost 50% increase in one-year college English completion rates (from 25% to 37%) [in North Carolina and Virginia] (Community College Research Center, 2015) At four colleges [in Arkansas, Michigan and New Jersey] offering co-requisite models, completion of college English was 1.6 to 2.3 times higher than in traditional remediation, increasing from 38-50% to 62-78%. Equity gaps for Black and Hispanic students narrowed or disappeared completely (Center for Applied Research, 2015).
200 1000 1200 1400 800 600 400 Number Taking ALP or Traditional Each Fall 1406 ALP traditional dev writing 1328 1142 1042 966 884 700 687 670 669 590 587 550 408 288 149 68 34 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Fall 2013
200 1000 1200 1400 800 600 400 Number Taking ALP or Traditional Each Fall 1406 ALP traditional dev writing 1328 1142 1042 966 884 700 687 670 669 590 587 550 408 288 149 68 34 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
4000 6000 7000 5000 8000 2000 1000 3000 Analyzing Pass Rates 7589 traditional ALP total 5343 2246 number in cohort 2009-2013
4000 6000 7000 5000 8000 2000 1000 3000 Analyzing Pass Rates 7589 traditional ALP total 5343 30% 63% 4781 2993 2246 1584 1409 number who would have passed 101 if we had fully scaled up number in cohort 2009-2013 number who passed 101 2009-2013
4000 6000 7000 5000 8000 2000 1000 3000 Analyzing Pass Rates traditional ALP total 4781 3576 1788 2993 number who would have passed 101 if we had fully scaled up number in cohort 2009-2013 number who passed 101 2009-2013
26 Boeing 737-700s 137 seats per plane
200 1000 1200 1400 800 600 400 Number Taking ALP or Traditional Each Fall 1406 ALP traditional dev writing 1328 100% 1142 1042 966 884 700 687 670 669 590 587 550 408 288 149 68 34 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Fall 2013 Fall 2016
Two very differentMichigan Colleges, Two Tales of Scaling ALP Henry Ford College Dearborn, MI ~18,000 students North Central Michigan College Petoskey, MI ~2,600 students
ALP Timeline at NCMC • Piloted 2 sections in 2011 • Gradually scaled up while assessing success vs. stand-alone • Pass rate increased by 6% • Enrolled in more credits subsequent semesters—more tuition $ • Outperformed stand-alone students in structure, development, and mechanics • Result: No curricular or financial negatives. Difficult to schedule. Hand-enroll with mandatory advising. • Currently at full scale.