1 / 33

A Spatially Explicit Method for Determining the Effects of Watershed Scale Land Use on Stream Conditions by Jon Kehme

A Spatially Explicit Method for Determining the Effects of Watershed Scale Land Use on Stream Conditions by Jon Kehmeier For partial fulfillment of the degree of Master of Science in Bioresource Engineering. Study Objectives.

rhett
Download Presentation

A Spatially Explicit Method for Determining the Effects of Watershed Scale Land Use on Stream Conditions by Jon Kehme

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Spatially Explicit Method for Determining the Effects of Watershed Scale Land Use on Stream Conditions by Jon Kehmeier For partial fulfillment of the degree of Master of Science in Bioresource Engineering

  2. Study Objectives • Identify and quantify the impacts that various land use practices have on native fish • Develop a method that accounts for complexity of agricultural watersheds

  3. Site Selection • Identified 142 agricultural basins • Rank based on percentage of each agricultural land in basin • Ag: Row Crop, Annual Grass, Perennial Grass Orchard/Berry, Pasture • Non-Ag: Urban, Riparian/Wetland, Forest • Develop histograms based on ranks

  4. Sampling Efforts • Backpack Electrofishing • In-stream habitat evaluation • Terrestrial land use evaluation

  5. Model Development • Assumptions • Each land use has a unique and measurable effect on stream fish communities • All portions of a basin have an impact • Land use near the sampled reach has larger impact • Response of fish community is a function of upstream landscape

  6. Model Development • Grid Development • Land Use/Land Cover (LULC) grid • Flow direction grid • Stream network grid • Use for development of algorithms to determine cell-specific flow paths

  7. Model Development • Compute lengths of flow paths Total distance In-stream distanceOut-of-stream distance

  8. Model Development • Influence of one land use cell • Sum Icells for each land use in a watershed and use sum as influence measure of that land use

  9. Row Crops Ann. Grass Per. Grass Orch/Berry Pasture Urban Riparian Forest Streams Sampled Reach

  10. Sampled Reach

  11. Sampled Reach

  12. Sampled Reach

  13. Model Development • Total distance model (TLU)

  14. Model Development • In-stream/Out-of-Stream (InOut) Model

  15. Results • Analysis showed no evidence of annual variations within replicated sites • Biomass of native benthic dwelling fish most significant response • Model using squared in-stream and out-of-stream metrics most successful

  16. Interpretation of InOut-2 Coefficients

  17. Discussion of Model Coefficients • Instream row crop • Increased runoff / baseflows • Eutrophication • Instream grass metric • Surface roughness • Mimics natural vegetation • Out of stream annual grass • Autumn disturbance

  18. Discussion of Model Coefficients • Out of stream urban • Flashy runoff events • Silt and organic substrates • Loss of habitat

More Related