1 / 14

Gemstone Team

O N L I N E. bserving. Gemstone Team. uances of. earning . Maureen Bowers Neal Freyman Lizzy McLellan Brian Paxton Jeremy Spiegel Mentor: Dr. Michael Zachariah Librarian: Dr. David Wilt. n. on-traditional. nvironments. INTRO. O N L I N E. Intro and Relevance.

rhian
Download Presentation

Gemstone Team

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. O N L I N E bserving Gemstone Team uances of earning Maureen Bowers Neal Freyman Lizzy McLellan Brian Paxton Jeremy Spiegel Mentor: Dr. Michael Zachariah Librarian: Dr. David Wilt n on-traditional nvironments

  2. INTRO O N L • I N E Intro and Relevance LIT REVIEW • Online classes are becoming more popular • Overcrowding in classrooms • Cheaper and easily accessible • There is a stigma sometimes attached to online education • Previous studies have found conflicting results METHODOLOGY FUTURE REFERENCES

  3. INTRO O N L I N E Definition of Key Terms LIT REVIEW • Teacher immediacy—communication behaviors that reduce the perceived distance between teachers and students • Ex. How warm and/or positive the teacher is • Student success—the amount that students learn from the lecture as measured by their scores on the posttest • Perceived learning—how much subject material a student thinks they have learned from the lecture METHODOLOGY FUTURE REFERENCES

  4. INTRO O N L I N E Lit Review LIT REVIEW • Background • Meta-analysis by the Department of Education (2009) • A collection of previous experimental studies in online education. • The Role of Teacher Immediacy (Allen, Witt, Wheeless, 2006) and Teacher Immediacy Behaviors, Student Motivation, and Learning (Christophel, 1990) • importance of teachers’ interactions with the students in a traditional classroom setting METHODOLOGY FUTURE REFERENCES

  5. INTRO O N L I N E Lit Review LIT REVIEW • Similarities to our methodology  • Online vs live methods for teaching difficult airway management to anesthesiology residents (Bello, 2005) • Gave conclusive results after only one training session • Determinants of Students’ Perceived Learning Outcomes (Wen, 2006) • Uses a survey on perceived learning • Instructional Video and E-Learning (Zhang, 2006) • Uses randomization, one lecture, and a large sample size METHODOLOGY FUTURE REFERENCES

  6. INTRO O N L I N E Research Question LIT REVIEW • Which learning environment and lecture format will produce the most student success when choosing from a traditional classroom, a video lecture with a live student audience, or a video lecture without a student audience? • In addition, how do the perceived teacher immediacy levels and perceived learning differ among these environments? METHODOLOGY FUTURE REFERENCES

  7. INTRO O N L I N E Methodological Procedure LIT REVIEW We will randomly assign each student to one of three groups. Students will attend/view their assigned lectures, then take a posttest in class during the next lecture session. METHODOLOGY Traditional face-to-face classroom Online video without an audience Online video with audience FUTURE REFERENCES

  8. Pilot Study

  9. INTRO O N L I N E Group ATraditional Face-to-Face Classroom LIT REVIEW METHODOLOGY FUTURE REFERENCES

  10. INTRO O N L I N E Group BOnline Video with an Audience LIT REVIEW METHODOLOGY FUTURE REFERENCES

  11. INTRO O N L I N E Group COnline video without an Audience LIT REVIEW METHODOLOGY FUTURE REFERENCES

  12. INTRO O N L I N E Plans for Progress (pfp) LIT REVIEW METHODOLOGY FUTURE REFERENCES

  13. INTRO O N L I N E References LIT REVIEW Allen, M., Witt, P. L., & Wheeless, L. R. (2006). The Role of Teacher Immediacy as a Motivational Factor in Student Learning: Using Meta-Analysis to Test a Causal Model. Communication Education, 55(1), 21-31. Bello, G., Pennisi, M. A., Maviglia, R., Maggiore, S. M., Bocci, M. G., Montini, L., et al. (2005). Online vs. live methods for teaching difficult airway management to anesthesiology residents. Intensive Care Medicine, 31, 547-552. Christophel, D. M. (1990). The Relationships among Teacher Immediacy Behaviors, Student Motivation, and Learning. Communication Education, 39(4), 323-340. Means, Barbara, Toyama, Yukie, Murphy, Robert, Bakia, Marianne, & Jones, Karla. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies (ED-04-CO-0040). Washington, DC: Retrieved from www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd/ppss/reports.html. Wen, J. H., Eom, S. B., & Ashill, N. (2006). The Determinants of Students’ Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in University Online Education: An Empirical Investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235. Zhang, D. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management, 43(1), 15-27. METHODOLOGY FUTURE REFERENCES

  14. Questions?

More Related