270 likes | 399 Views
Need for a mission to understand the Earth-Venus-Mars difference in Nitrogen. M. Yamauchi (IRF, Kiruna), I. Dandouras (IRAP, Toulouse), and the NITRO proposal team. 4 th SERENA – HEWG Meeting, Key Largo, May 2013. (A) Nitrogen as essential element of life.
E N D
Need for a mission to understand the Earth-Venus-Mars difference in Nitrogen M. Yamauchi (IRF, Kiruna), I. Dandouras (IRAP, Toulouse), and the NITRO proposal team 4th SERENA – HEWG Meeting, Key Largo, May 2013
(A) Nitrogen as essential element of life Miller’s experiment (Miller and Urey, 1959). Model atmosphere + model lightning (discharge) amino acid was formed! The result depends on the oxidation state of N reduced form (NH3) neutral form (N2) oxidized form (NOx) Formation of pre-biotic molecules is most likely related to the relative abundance of N, O, and H near the surface (not only the amount!)
(B) N in the brother plants Earth: 75% of atmospheric mass (the amount in the soil, crust, and ocean are small) Venus ~ 2.5 times as much as Earth (3% of Patm.Venus = 90 x Patm.Earth) Titan ~ 1.5 times as much as Earth (98% of Patm.Titan) Mars ~ only 0.01%of the Earth (note: MMars ~ 10% of MEarth)
(B) N and O in the brother plants N is missing at Mars but O is abundant in all three planets (Martian case, exist in the crust as oxidized rocks) Oxidation (O/N ratio for given Temperature) of planet is Mars > Venus > (Titan?) > Earth
Nitrogen (N/O ratio) Mystery N < 0.01% of Earth/Venus rich in N Venus Earth Mars N/O ratio at Mars << at the Earth, Venus, Titan
(B) N in the brother plants N/O ratio anomaly at Mars A mystery in the solar system because (1) N is much more difficult to be ionised than O,due to the triple chemical binding (i.e., more difficult to escape). (2) The evolution model (Lammer’s model) cannot explain the N/O of both Venus and Mars simultaneously.
How about observation of escape? It is not easy to estimate the “value” of ancient abundance. However, tendency of N/O ratioof escape against solar forcing might be easier to obtain ( see example).
Example: guessing O+/H+ ratio ion escape H+< 50 eV O+< 50 eV H+> 10 eV O+> 10 eV High UV Low UV Akebono/SMS (Cully et al., 2003) Polar/TIMAS (Peterson, 2002)
Dependence on the solar forcing Quick rotation of early Sun stronger dynamo stronger solar maxium stronger CME Ancient? High UV flux of early Sun expansion of the ionosphere beyond the magnetopause. Treat as non-magnetized planet Ancient
Guessing escape (Non-Magnetised) Expected change in the escape of H, O, N (increase level +, ++, or +++) in response to enhanced external forcing. () means no relevant observation
Guessing escape (Magnetised) Expected change in the escape of H, O, N (increase level +, ++, or +++) in response to enhanced input from the sun
Present knowledge on N+ escape (1) Akebono (1989 launch): cold ions < 0.05 keV N+ N+ N++ N++ ram direction = ambient plasma // direction to B
Present knowledge on N+ escape More drastic change of N+ than O+ for < 0.05 keV N+ N+ N2+ But destination and acceleration is not clear
Present knowledge on N+ escape (2) AMPTE (1984 launch): energetic ions > 30 keV (Hamilton et al., 1988)
But no observations of N/O at 0.1 - 30 keV All past magnetospheric (and Mars / Venus) missions failed to separate N+ from O+at 0.05~10 keV range. This is because the time-of-flight (TOF) instruments use “start” foils, where ion energy losses (ion velocity scatter) merge the O+ TOF and the N+ TOF.
Technology is within reach! MEX / IMA, IRF
Technology is within reach! MEX/IMA detected C+/N+/O+ group in 4 mass channels (ch.10, 11, 12, 13) out of total 32 channels. * IMA uses only 5 cm magnet to separate mass-per-charge, and by doubling the magnet to 10 cm, we could separate C-N-O.
CESR/IRAP Time-of-Flight R&D: Grazing-incidence MCP as “start foil” Beam energy of 10 keV P. Devoto, J.-L.Médale, and J.-A. Sauvaud, Rev. Sci. Instru., 2008
Need for a mission (1) Understanding the non-thermal nitrogen escape is important in modeling both the ancient atmosphere of the Earth and the Martian nitrogen mystery. (2) Unfortunately, past magnetospheric missions could not separate N+/O+ for > 50 eV because of high cross-talk in TOF instruments. (3) Now, the technology to separate N+ and O+ with light-weight instrument just became available. (4) Therefore, we need a dedicated mission to understand N+. This is the Nitro mission, that was proposed to ESA.
Mission orbit and Payload North In-situ obs. All types of ion mass analysers: (1) Magnet (2) Grazing-incidence MCP as “start foil” (3) Shutter TOF (4) Reflection TOF (various types) Imaging ENA of 1-10 keV (substorm injections) Optical (emission) (1) N+ : 91nm, 108nm (2) N2+ : 391 nm, 428nm (3) NO+ South
cf. Auroral N2+ emission e- collisions ionise N2to make exited N2+ that emits blue line (but N2 is exited or even N2+ pre-exists by solar UV during equinox)
Qualitative differences between O+ & N+ (1) Transport: Magnetospheric Physics H+ O+ How about N+ and N2+?
In-situ Payload Requirements #1: N+- O+ separation (M / ∆M ≥ 8 for narrow mass range) and H+- He+- O+ separation (M/∆M ≥ 2 for wide mass) at and // directions at 10-1000 eV (11 km/s~9 eV for N) with ∆E/E ≤ 7% ((EO+-EN+) / EN+ = 15%).
Nitrogen is our future Nitrogen is an essential element of life N/O ratio is quite different between brother plants No observations of N+/O+ ratio at 0.1 - 10 keV range New Mission with the first-time measurement of N+ and N+ / O+ ratio of the escape (>50 eV) for interdisciplinary purposes: (a) History of oxidation state of the atmospheric nitrogen, (b) Mars mystery on N/O ratio, (c) ion injections and dynamics in the magnetosphere (d) acceleration mechanisms, (e) re-distribution of energy in the upper ionosphere.
N/O ratio at Mars << at the Earth, Venus, Titan: We Need a Nitrogen mission Proposal for a Small Mission, submitted to ESA: June 2012 “Quad Chart” submitted to NASA (Heliophysics): January 2013 Preparation for a proposal to ESA, in response to the forthcoming M-4 call.