370 likes | 547 Views
Sub- Nyquist Sampling of Wideband Signals. Optimization of the choice of mixing sequences. Itai Friedman Tal Miller Supervised by: Deborah Cohen Technion – Israel Institute of Technology. Presentation Outline. Brief System Description Project Objective System Simulation
E N D
Sub-Nyquist Sampling of Wideband Signals Optimization of the choice of mixing sequences Itai Friedman Tal Miller Supervised by: Deborah Cohen Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Presentation Outline • Brief System Description • Project Objective • System Simulation • Literature Review • Project Gantt
Spectrum Sparsity • Spectrum is underutilized • In a given place, at a given time, only a small number of PUs transmit concurrently Shared Spectrum Company (SSC) – 16-18 Nov 2005
Model ~ ~ ~ ~ • Input signal in Multiband model: • Signal support is but it is sparse. • N – max number of transmissions • B – max bandwidth of each transmission • Output: • Reconstructed signal • Blind detection of each transmission • Minimal achievable rate: 2NB << fNYQ Mishali & Eldar ‘09
The Modulated Wideband Converter (MWC) ~ ~ ~ ~ Mishali & Eldar ‘10
MWC – Recovery ~ ~ ~ ~ Now we can solve a linear set of equations for input signal:
MWC – Mixing & Aliasing • System requirement: are periodic functions with period called “Mixing functions” • Examples for : … 1 -1 Frequency domain
MWC – Mixing & Aliasing • In the sequences case:
Project Objective • Questions: • What are the best Mixing functions ? • Focusing on {+1,-1} functions, what properties should the sequences have? • Main Objective: • Finding optimal Mixing function sequences for effective reconstruction
What is our part in the system? • Analog signal generation • Mixing • Filtering • Sampling • Recovery • The code already exists, we modify the mixing functions generator
System Simulation • Simulation parameters:
MWC – Support Recovery (CTF) Problem:infinite number of linear systems (f is continuous) • Solve in the time domain for each n: • Time consuming • Not robust to noise • CTF (Continuous To Finite): Infinite problem (IMV) One finite-dimensional problem
Spark • Definitions: • The spark of a given matrix A is the smallest number of columns that are linearly dependent • spark(A)≥k if every set of (k-1) columns are linearly independent
Spark • Definitions: • The spark of a given matrix A is the smallest number of columns that are linearly dependent • spark(A)≥k if every set of (k-1) columns are linearly independent • Theorem (reconstruction): • For any vector , there exists at most one k-sparse signal , such that if and only if Spark(A)>2k . In particular, for uniqueness we must have that m ≥2k
RIP: (Restricted Isometry Property) • Definitions: • A matrix A has RIP(k) if there exists a such that:
RIP: (Restricted Isometry Property) • Definitions: • A matrix A has RIP(k) if there exists a such that: • Properties: • If A satisfies RIP(2k) for any , then spark(A)>2k (reconstruction guarantee) • RIP based theorems give bounds on reconstruction error in the presence of noise (dependence on reconstruction algorithm and noise level)
Probabilistic Views Mishali & Eldar ‘10 • Problem: Calculating Spark/RIP is NP-hard • Solution: Take on a probabilistic worldview
Probabilistic Views Mishali & Eldar ‘10 • Problem: Calculating Spark/RIP is NP-hard • Solution: Take on a probabilistic worldview • Assume A matrix is random, very high chances ( ) that A has appropriate Spark/RIP qualities for reconstruction, for all k-sparse signals x Worldview 1
Probabilistic Views Mishali & Eldar ‘10 • Problem: Calculating Spark/RIP is NP-hard • Solution: Take on a probabilistic worldview • Assume A matrix is random, very high chances ( ) that A has appropriate Spark/RIP qualities for reconstruction, for all k-sparse signals x • Problems: • Lack of characterization of Astructure • In practice, implementing A on hardware is deterministic and not dynamic Worldview 1
Probabilistic Views Mishali & Eldar ‘10 • Problem: Calculating Spark/RIP is NP-hard • Solution: Take on a probabilistic worldview • Assume signal itself is random • Signal randomness is demandedin the properties: • StRIP– Statistical RIP • ExRIP– Expected RIP Worldview 2
StRIP Mishali & Eldar ‘10 • Definition: The A matrix has the if A has with probability at least p for all k-sparse signals x such that: • supp(x) is uniformly distributed
StRIP Mishali & Eldar ‘10 • Definition: The A matrix has the if A has with probability at least p for all k-sparse signals x such that: • supp(x) is uniformly distributed
ExRIP Mishali & Eldar ‘10 • Definition: The A matrix has the if A has with probability at least p for all k-sparse signals x such that: • supp(x) is uniformly distributed • Nonzero values of x are i.i.d
ExRIP Mishali & Eldar ‘10 • Theorem: Let be the MWC sensing matrix. If the nonzeros of x are drawn from a symmetric distribution, then has the ExRIP with probability:
ExRIP Mishali & Eldar ‘10
ExRIP Mishali & Eldar ‘10 • ExRIPguarantees for different families of binary sequences: • Further literature review is needed in the field of families of binary mixing sequences
Thank you For listening And thanks Debby for the basis to our presentation