1 / 34

O*NET-SOC Auto-Coder

O*NET-SOC Auto-Coder. U.S. Department of Labor Employment And Training Administration. O*NET-SOC Auto-Coder. What is the O*NET-SOC Auto-Coder? A web service Accurate O*NET-SOC coding Codes individuals or job openings Integrated interactive/batch application. Working with Related Systems.

rhona
Download Presentation

O*NET-SOC Auto-Coder

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. O*NET-SOC Auto-Coder U.S. Department of Labor Employment And Training Administration

  2. O*NET-SOC Auto-Coder • What is the O*NET-SOC Auto-Coder? • A web service • Accurate O*NET-SOC coding • Codes individuals or job openings • Integrated interactive/batch application

  3. Working with Related Systems

  4. Connecting to Auto-Coder • UI Claims • WIA/One-Stop Career Center • Labor Market Information • Reemployment Services

  5. 400 350 300 Auto Coder 250 303 200 NJ Coding 150 198 100 50 0 Auto-Coder Accuracy • Auto-Coder vs. staff • 400 Claimant coded: • Auto-Coder = 303 • New Jersey = 198 • Results • Auto-Coder 75% accuracy • Better in interactive mode • Staff 50% accuracy

  6. USDOL Provides Auto-Coder • Free License • Documentation • Software • Executable only • Non-modifiable source code

  7. StateFunding Missouri $235,762   Wisconsin $181,287   Ohio $235,762   Indiana $233,107   Nebraska $136,164 Iowa $236,762 Michigan $191,006 Region 5 FY 2005 SBRs

  8. Expanded Use of Auto-Coder

  9. Prior to Auto-Coder O*NET–SOC Table O*NET-SOC Table Career Center UI Application

  10. The Original Vision • Bridge “language barrier” • Train Claims Service Representatives • Streamlined process • Job Match

  11. The Reality • Issues creating “real-time” Job Match • Only as “strong” as the Job Order • Staff lack knowledge of O*NET coding • Not all UI clients registered • Career Centers limitations

  12. Finding the Glue Career Center UI Application Nebraska Workforce Access System (NWAS)

  13. Auto-Coder Software Career Center UI Application Nebraska Workforce Access System (NWAS) Integrating Auto-Coder

  14. The Auto-Coder Process • UI claimants assigned an O*NET code • Information backfills daily

  15. Demonstration

  16. Career Center staff • O*NET code • O*NET title • County Location • Zip Code Assignment • Initial claim/file date • Veteran Status

  17. Making The Connection • Career Center staff contact claimant • Contact by phone, email or letter • Files are available until • Labor Exchange System Registration • Obtained Employment • 12 months and one day

  18. The Obvious Benefits • Expedites • Employment • Reemployment • Reduction • Weeks Claimed • Weeks Paid • Savings to Trust Fund

  19. Not So Obvious Benefits • Identified and Expanded Labor Pool • Aggressive intercept of UI application • “Real-time” gap analysis • Statewide • Regionally • By Career Center

  20. New and Improved Data • Local Economic Development • Local Chambers • Local Workforce Investment Boards • Local Employers • Local Job Seekers • Local Educators

  21. The Future Vision • Integrated systems • Integrated staff • Smarter and effective “product” • Labor Market Projections and Trends • Identify tomorrow’s Skills Sets • Identify today’s Transferrable Skills

  22. Connecting UI Claimants to Reemployment Services BRIDGING THE GAP The Rhode Island Experience

  23. Reemployment Goal • Match job seekers to employers • Initial UI claims filing • Workforce Development • Career Centers • Connecting to One Stop Centers • Match job orders to the correct code • A rapid return to work

  24. Implementation • Initial use in September 2005 • Installed on call center PCs • Staff training • 15 minute • Staff was very receptive • Testing completed in December 2005 • Deployment to Internet application

  25. Using Auto-Coder • Phone Claims • Internet Claims • Employers • What Happened • Problems with employer job orders • Employers lack of experience • Selections are too broad and general

  26. Lessons Learned • Auto-Coder is a great tool • Only as good as the O*NET codes • No Marine Biologist • No Pharmacy Manager • O*NET needs frequent updates based • RI’s job order filters not as effective • 70% reduction of claims not coded • Improving Auto-Coder’s effectiveness • Included in all employer self directed job listings

  27. Management and Staff Comments • Awesome • Haven’t had a problem yet • Love it • Saves time • Best thing ever • Efficient time saving tool • Replaced outdated process • Minor problems with individual PCs

  28. Recommendations • Critical areas • Experience • Skills • Licenses • Degrees • Certifications • Direct link to the O*NET Consortium

  29. Making the Connection • State Economic Development System • Employers • Claimants • UI Trust Fund WIN! WIN! WIN!

  30. Raymond Filippone Assistant Director Income Support Rhode Island Department of Labor and Training 1511 Pontiac Ave Cranston, Rhode Island 02920 401-462-8415 rfilippone.dlt.state.ri.us Rhode Island Contact Information:

  31. Auto-Coder Information • Web site: http://autocoder.itsc.org • A Demo of the O*NET-SOC Auto-Coder • http://support.itsc.org/csr/csr_autocode.pl • An evaluation of the Auto-Coder • Documentation • News and announcements • Send questions to: autocoder_inquiries@mail.itsc.org

  32. Briefers Contact Information • Steve Scott U.S. DOL-ETA, Region 5, Chicago scott.steven@dol.gov (312) 596-5439 • Cecilia Coatney Nebraska Workforce Development/ Nebraska Dept of Labor Cecilia.Coatney@nebraska.gov 402-471-1932

More Related