120 likes | 264 Views
Some Unpublished TLS Results*:. Evolution of MH, h min-shear , h max-N 2 on TLS Profiles Compare MH, h min-shear , h max-N 2 on a 2-day scatter plot Examine NBL “top” using TLS( ε ) and Tower ( w 2 ) Upside Down Boundary Layer (TLS + Tower Profiles)
E N D
Some Unpublished TLS Results*: • Evolution ofMH, hmin-shear, hmax-N2 on TLS Profiles • Compare MH, hmin-shear, hmax-N2 on a 2-day scatter plot • Examine NBL “top” using TLS(ε) and Tower (w2 ) • Upside Down Boundary Layer (TLS + Tower Profiles) • Hi-Resolution Entrainment Region Measurements • Residual Layer (can be a pretty dynamic region) • TLS Profile Showing King-Air Generated Turbulence • Lidar, Sodar, TLS Comparison Profiles JAS (accepted) JAM (in final revision) * B. Balsley, R. Frehlich, M. Jensen, Y. Meillier
SBL* Evolution: (10/20/99, 0707-1216 UT) MH (-o-),hmin-shear (____), hmax-N2(……) *Traditional Boundary Layer (Profile separation ~ 30 min}
Relationship Between MH, hmin-shear, hmax-N2 (Oct 14th & 20th)
10/20/99 (0719 UT): MH Estimates via TLS(ε) and Tower (w2 ) w(t) at 20m & 55m TLS Tower MH MH
10/20/99 (0850 UT): MH Estimates via TLS(ε) and Tower (w2 ) TLS Tower w(t) at 20m & 55m ?? MH
CASES (10/14/99) 10.8 UT: High Vertical Resolution (~0.25 m) Energy Dissipation Rate (ε) Profiles in the Entrainment Region at 26 Sec. Intervals Energy Dissipation Rate (ε)
The “Residual” Layer: Not a Passive Region;10/21/99 ~0715 UT (4 sensors; 3m separation) 103 102
10/20/99 Example of a King-Air Exhaust “Trail” Advected Through a TLS Profile 1000 times stronger than ambient turbulence level
Compare Profiles: TLS (black), Sodar (blue), Lidar (green, red) (The Pentagon 21 May 2004)