1 / 39

合同セミナー 『 サプライチェーンリスク管理ど人道支援ロジスティクス 』

合同セミナー 『 サプライチェーンリスク管理ど人道支援ロジスティクス 』. Tokyo Maritime University 07/04/2013 . Optimization of the configuration of a supply chain and impact of a supplier disruption. Prof. Matsukawa , MARC Seiji Keio University, Graduate School of Science and Technology. Introduction.

rian
Download Presentation

合同セミナー 『 サプライチェーンリスク管理ど人道支援ロジスティクス 』

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 合同セミナー『サプライチェーンリスク管理ど人道支援ロジスティクス』合同セミナー『サプライチェーンリスク管理ど人道支援ロジスティクス』 Tokyo Maritime University 07/04/2013

  2. Optimization of the configuration of a supply chain and impact of a supplier disruption Prof. Matsukawa , MARC Seiji Keio University, Graduate School of Science and Technology

  3. Introduction • How to configure a supply chain? • What suppliers, processes, transportation modes to choose? • Indeed each stage of a supply chain might have several options

  4. Introduction • Graves and Willems (2005) explore the supply chain configuration issue • Minimization of the supply chain cost with a dynamic program • Goal of this research: • Compare single and dual sourcing • Analyze the effects of a supplier disruption • Adapt the model to take into account fixed ordering costs Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  5. Table • Supply chain configuration model • Single and dual sourcing • Impact of a disruption • Inventory policies • Conclusion Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  6. Supply chain configuration model Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  7. Network model and inputs • Network model of the supply chain • Several options at each node: 1 6 2 7 9 3 • External demand: • Mean • Standard deviation 1 4 8 1 5 2 3 Cost Lead time Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  8. The optimization problem • We try to minimize the total SC cost: • Subject to some constraints: • One option chosen at each node • Feasibility of the service times • Respect of the service time to the external customer Safety stock cost Pipeline stock cost COGS Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  9. The dynamic program • The variables: options and service times • At each step of the program we evaluate the following functional equation: • Output of the program: • Best options at each node to minimize the total SC cost • Optimal service times at each node Safety stock cost Pipeline stock cost COGS Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  10. Local VS global optimum • Local best option  option that minimizes the cost at the stage • Global best option  option that minimizes the total SC cost • We compare the expected total SC costs • With the local optimums: 56 482 $ • With the global optimums: 54 915 $ Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  11. Single and dual sourcing Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  12. Differences between single and dual sourcing Single sourcing Dual sourcing • Better pricing • Better and longer relationship • Better communication • Better security • Better flexibility • Maintain competition between suppliers 80% 20% Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  13. Selection of the second supplier • First selection policy: • Simplest selection policy • Better implementation in the existing program First run Second run Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  14. Selection of the second supplier • Second selection policy • Better selection policy • The existing program has to be adapted First run Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  15. Single VS dual sourcing • We compare the expected total SC cost • Single sourcing: 53 171 $ • Dual sourcing: 57 404 $ Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  16. Impact of a disruption Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  17. The calculation program • The calculation program simulates the behavior of the SC over a certain period of time (ex: 20 weeks) • Disruption characteristics: • Impacted supplier • Starting time and duration • For example: • Best option of stage 8 • Starts at t=3 for 4 periods Demand realization • Cost • Revenue • Profit Calculation program Configuration program Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  18. Cost calculation • The safety stock cost: • The pipeline stock cost: • The cost of goods sold: Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  19. Cost calculation • Penalty cost: Recovery cost Medium penalty rate High penalty rate Cost of holding some inventory + cost of inactivity Cost of increasing the production capacity Cost of holding some inventory + cost of inactivity Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  20. Profit calculation • The profit at time t is: 630 $ Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  21. Single VS dual sourcing without disruption • Cost • Total SC cost over the 20 weeks: • Single sourcing: 1 113 410$ • Dual sourcing: 1 202 583$ • Difference: 8% Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  22. Single VS dual sourcing without disruption • Profit • Total SC profit: • Single sourcing: 207 699$ • Dual sourcing: 118 526$ • Difference: -43% Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  23. Single VS dual sourcing with disruption • Total SC profit: • Single sourcing: -99 109$ (207 699 $) • Dual sourcing: 104 214$ (118 526 $) (No disruption) time disruption Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  24. Single sourcing analysis • Cost Penalty cost Disruption time Lead time of the disrupted node Service time of the disrupted node Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  25. Single sourcing analysis • Profit • Without disruption: 207 699$ • With disruption: -99 109$ Profit overshoot Disruption time Lead time of the disrupted node Service time of the disrupted node Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  26. Dual sourcing analysis Disruption time • Cost Only 20% of supply Impact of the stocks of 2nd option Lead time of the disrupted node Back to 100% Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  27. Dual sourcing analysis • Total SC profit: • Without disruption: 118 526$ • With disruption: 104 214$ • Difference: 12% Back to 100% Only 20% of supply Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  28. Inventory policy Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  29. The inventory policy • In the existing model, (s,S) policy with no fixed ordering cost • S = s • Orders at each period of time • We change the inventory policy • K ≠ 0 • We choose an (s,Q) policy • We work with the single sourcing policy on the expected costs Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  30. The (s,Q) policy • The inventory level: I s t Reorder quantity Q = EOQ Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  31. Results with fixed ordering cost Orders at each period (s,Q) policy • Expected total cost: (53 171 $)  120 171 $ • Inventory cost: 3901 $ 3% • Pipeline + COGS: 49 270 $ 41% • Fixed ordering cost: 67 000 $ 56% • Expected total cost: 105 504 $ • Inventory cost: 33 292 $ 31% • Pipeline + COGS: 49 270 $ 47% • Fixed ordering cost: 22 942 $ 22% Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  32. Conclusion Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  33. Conclusion • Single VS dual sourcing: • Single sourcing more efficient if no disruption • In case of disruption, dual sourcing is way better • With fixed ordering cost: • (s,Q) ordering policy has better results than every period ordering policy • The balance of the different types of cost is different Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  34. Conclusion • This research produced: • A configuration tool that works with different sourcing and inventory policies • A quantitative analysis of different types of SC configuration • A comparison between the different types of SC configuration Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  35. Further research developments • Improve the risk management approach: • Take into account a disruption risk • Improve the model to optimize more general SC Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  36. References • Optimizing the supply chain configuration for new products S.C.Graves, S.P.Willems, Management Science, 2005 • Optimal supply chain configuration strategies for new products S.P.Willems, PhD thesis, MIT, 1999 • Managing risks of supply chains disruptions: dual sourcing as a real option S.Pochard, master thesis, MIT, 2000 • Trial by fire: a blaze in Albuquerque sets off major crisis for cellphone giants A.Latour, Wall Street Journal, 29 Jan 2001 • To the rescue: Toyota’s fast rebound after fire at supplier shows why it is tough V.Reitman, Wall Street Journal, 08 May 1997 • The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks C.Tang, B.Tomlin, International Journal of Production Economics, 2008 • Single or dual sourcing: decision-making in the presence of supply chain disruption risks H.Yu, A.Z.Zeng, L.Zhao, Omega, 2009 • Competition in multiechelon assembly supply chains S.M.Carr, U.S.Karmarkar, Management Science, 2005 Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  37. Thank you for your attention • Question or remark ? Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  38. Inventory policy • Cycle times Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

  39. Single VS dual sourcing without disruption • Cost Prof. Matsukawa, MARC Seiji

More Related