310 likes | 548 Views
Cultivating Critical Thinking Across the College. Presented by Barbara June Rodriguez Renee Hosang-Alleyne Laura Rambarose Teaching Academic Success Skills (TASS) Conference Fort Lauderdale, Florida March 2014. Workshop Objectives. As a result of this workshop, participants will:
E N D
Cultivating Critical Thinking Across the College Presented by Barbara June Rodriguez Renee Hosang-Alleyne Laura Rambarose Teaching Academic Success Skills (TASS) Conference Fort Lauderdale, Florida March 2014
Workshop Objectives As a result of this workshop, participants will: • Discuss strategies to cultivate critical thinking across the institution • Identify strategies to assist students in thinking more critically • Engage in hands-on activities
Broward College • Offers bachelor’s degrees, associate degrees and certificates • 49,144 credit enrolled students • 84% part-time students • 16% full-time students • 57.2% female students • 41.8% male students • 36.3% Black • 34.6% Hispanic • 21.1% White Based on 2013-2014 Broward College Data
Critical Thinking Definition Critical thinking (CT) is defined as a process of evaluating information by questioning and testing assumptions, accepting and rejecting arguments and/or perspectives, and applying reasoning to make informed decisions.
Critical Thinking Goal & Outcomes Goal: To enhance students’ critical thinking skills Students will be able to: • Analyzeand interpret relevant information • Explainquestions, problems, and/or issues • Evaluateinformation to determine credibility of reasoning • Generatewell-reasoned conclusions
Teaching and Learning Strategies to Enhance Critical Thinking (CT) within the Discipline of Sociology Critical Thinking is an EXPLICT goal.
Ex. Building a Theoretical Table With this table students move beyond the meaning of the theories, show how theories work across sociological issues and gets them to the step of evaluation back
Activity: Learning Sociological Theory through Deep Listening Context • This exercise is done as the opening to new lessons. • It is followed up by discussion and a written exercise. back
Activity: Learning Sociological Theory through Deep Listening Learning outcomes: • Explain each sociological theory • Analyze and Interpret how each theory works Sociological Theories Functionalism: Conflict Theory: Symbolic Interactionism:
Directions • Break up into groups of three (3) • There will be three (3) readers, each reading a definition • Readers: 1 = Functionalism, 2= Conflict Theory, 3= Symbolic Interactionism • Each reader will go one at a time • Each reader reads the respective definition slowly and deliberately 3x, while the other group members listen only • After reading three times, the listeners will verbally explain in their own words the definition they just heard
Activity: Learning Sociological Theory through Deep Listening
Reflection • What have we learned from this assignment? • How useful do you find deep listening? • In what other ways do you think you can use deep listening?
Activity: Thought Paper Analysis Learning Outcome • Analyze & interpret relevant Information Muddiest Point Activity
Activity: Project-based Learning Learning outcomes: • Analyze and interpret relevant information • Generate well-reasoned conclusions • After learning about the different disorders and multiple therapeutic approaches, students select a character, diagnose character with a mental disorder(s), discuss issues and how they would treat their “client”
Freud’s Levels of Consciousness • Freud believed that the personality has 3 components: • Id- operates at an unconscious level, contains libido (a person’s basic sexual & aggressive impulses). Motivates a person to seek pleasure and avoid pain (big bad baby; devil) • Ego- the preconscious, thinking part of personality. Keep needs of Id satisfied and the three components balanced (reality; us) • Superego- the conscious moral judge, contains rules of society (angel)
Directions • Participants break up into groups of 3. • Read the scenario that you were given. • Amongst yourselves, decide who will be the Id, Ego, and Superego. • Act out your respective part.
Reflection • Did you find it challenging to think of how to be in your respective part? • How did you feel? • What if you were a different component?
Resources • Angelo, T.A. & Cross, K.P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. (2 ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. • Broward College. Question Every Possibility - Think Critically: Quality Enhancement Plan. SACSCOC Onsite Review, October 2013. www.broward.edu/qep • Foundation for Critical Thinking www.criticalthinking.org • Suskie, L. (2009). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide. (2 ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.