1 / 15

The Operational Space Formulation Implementation to Aircraft Canopy Polishing Using a Mobile Manipulator

The Operational Space Formulation Implementation to Aircraft Canopy Polishing Using a Mobile Manipulator. Rodrigo Jamisola, Marcelo H. Ang, Jr., Denny Oetomo, Oussama Khatib, Tao Ming Lim, Ser Yong Lim. Acknowledgements:. The Operational Space Formulation (Khatib 1987).

richard_edik
Download Presentation

The Operational Space Formulation Implementation to Aircraft Canopy Polishing Using a Mobile Manipulator

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Operational Space Formulation Implementation to Aircraft Canopy Polishing Using a Mobile Manipulator Rodrigo Jamisola, Marcelo H. Ang, Jr., Denny Oetomo, Oussama Khatib, Tao Ming Lim, Ser Yong Lim Acknowledgements:

  2. The Operational Space Formulation (Khatib 1987) • Dynamics formulated in operational space, as seen from point of contact/operation. • allows simultaneous force and motion control • force is controlled along the directions constrained by the environment • motion is controlled in the direction of free motion • Task is specified in terms of operational space forces.

  3. The Mobile Manipulator • PUMA 560, a six-axis articulated arm • Nomad XR4000, omni-directional holonomic mobile base

  4. In the aircraft canopy polishing task: • geometry of the canopy is unknown to the robot • robot end-effector moves to and fro on the surface of the canopy • by compliant motion control, tool complies to the canopy surface • force is controlled normal to the canopy surface • base is moved via joystick, treated as a disturbance to the polishing task, to cover the whole surface of the canopy

  5. The choice of operational point

  6. Implementation Principle • The operator controlling the joystick provide higher level intelligence by moving the mobile base to cover the entire canopy surface • Compliant motion control represents lower level intelligence so human operator need not bother with commanding the motion of the polishing tool • Normal force maintained at 10  4 N with mobile base moving

  7. The Operational Space Force and Motion Control (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Puma dynamics model derived from Armstrong, Khatib, Burdick 1986 and verified from Jamisola, Ang, Lim, Khatib, Lim 1999

  8. Robot Arm Singularity Handling (6) (7) (9) (8) (6) (6) (10) (1)

  9. Error response of PUMA in free motion running at maximum speed of 1.9 m/s in Operational Space

  10. Comparing results with and without friction modeling

  11. Simultaneous force feedback and errors in motion along x and y

  12. Force reading as PUMA moves in and out of singularity

  13. Acknowledgement Funding this presentation Prof. Anthony Maciejewski Where this project was done Prof. Marcelo H. Ang, Jr. Consultancy on this project Prof. Oussama Khatib Funding for this project Dr. Ser Yong Lim

  14. Video Presentation

  15. Video Presentation

More Related