70 likes | 86 Views
Learn the benefits and challenges of combining Historic Tax Credits with Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) to encourage affordable housing development. Discover how layering helps offset costs and promotes high rehabilitation standards while navigating conflicts, risks, and complexities in the selection process.
E N D
2170 Gilbert Avenue, Suite 100 • Cincinnati, Ohio 45206 Tel 513.559.0048 • Fax 513.559.0840
Pros • Currently Historic Equity pricing higher than LIHTC • Historic basis is deducted from the LIHTC basis • Layering helps offset the cost of the Section 106 findings • High rehab standards for historic encourage affordable housing development that is indistinguishable from market rate
Cons • Occasional conflicts between Historic preservation and the QAP. • ADA, Universal Design, Features, etc… • Risk of upfront Part 1 application costs being lost if the LIHTC application is not funded. • In some cases, the cost of historic compliance is greater than the incremental construction cost. • Windows: High energy costs vs. the aesthetics of storm windows.
Selection Process • Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky have several historic districts, many of which are plagued by poverty and neglect • Selection tends to be driven by neighborhood revitalization rather than individual buildings
Need • Is there demand? • Does it contribute to a larger revitalization effort? • Does the operating budget work? • Can enough money be raised to cover renovation and operational expenses? • Am I eligible for historic credits? (Fed or State) • Am I competitive enough to move forward with LIHTC Part 1 app? • Are other sources of gap financing available?