1 / 28

New Resonances a t Belle Jolanta Brodzicka INP Kraków For the Belle Collaboration

New Resonances a t Belle Jolanta Brodzicka INP Kraków For the Belle Collaboration XL IV Cracow School of Theoretical Physic s , Zakopane May 28 - June 6 , 2004. Topics : heavy-light mesons cs : D SJ in e + e -  cc continuum and B exclusive decays

rio
Download Presentation

New Resonances a t Belle Jolanta Brodzicka INP Kraków For the Belle Collaboration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. New Resonances at Belle Jolanta Brodzicka INP Kraków For the Belle Collaboration XLIV Cracow School of Theoretical Physics,Zakopane May 28 - June 6, 2004 • Topics : • heavy-light mesons • cs : DSJ in e+ e- cc continuum and B exclusive decays • cu : D** in B  D(*) + - decays • charmonium-like state X(3872)

  2. The Belle Collaboration A World-Wide Activity: ~300 People from ~50 Institiutions Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  3. KEK-B Factory • KEKB : Asymmetric e+e- collider • Two separate rings • e+ (LER) : 3.5 GeV • e- (HER) : 8.0 GeV • CM energy : 10.580 GeV at (4S) • e+e-  (4S)  BB • Parameters • 3016 m circumference • ±11 mrad crossing angle • History: Physics run since June 1999 • Luminosity peak:1.3x1034 cm-2s-1 • (achieved: 20May2004) • Integrated Luminosity: 250 fb-1 • ~ 260 x 10 6 BB • ~ 300 x 10 6 cc continuum events Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  4. Belle Detector Aerogel Cherenkov Counter • Event reconstruction •  Charged track  Central Drift Chamber (CDC)  Silicon Vertex Detector (SVD) •  Electron and photon  Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECL) Time of Flight Counter Central Drift Chamber Particle identification  K/ separation  CDC : dE/dx  Aerogel Cherenkov Counter (ACC)  Time of Flight Counter (TOF)  electron identification  ECL  KL and  identification  KL and muon detector (KLM) Vertexing  SVD SC Solenoid 1.5T Silicon Vertex Detector KL /Detector Electromagnetic Calorimeter Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  5. Inconsistent with model predictions. Expected: broad states with masses: 2.48 2.53 GeV (above D(*)K threshold) New observations at B-Factories • BaBarwith 91 fb-1on/off (4S)discovered resonance • DSJ(2317)  DS±0 • isospin violating decay , narrow state (  < 10MeV ) • BaBaralso sawpeak in DS 0 mass distribution@ ~2460 MeV • Interpreted as cross-feed from 2317(DS from 2317 + random  ) • CLEO (13.5 fb-1)confirmed DSJ(2317) establishedDSJ(2463) DS *±0 • Belle(87 fb-1)saw both : DSJ(2317) DSJ(2457) statesin cc continuum • & in B decays Topic of this talk • Interpretations: • DSJ(2317) DSJ(2457)identified with :0+ , 1+ orbitally excited P-wave cs states • more exotic assignments :DK molecule, multiquark state, mixing P-wave cs states with 4-quark csqq states ( masses shifted below D(*)K) Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  6. Q q Angular momentum of thelight quark Total spin of a meson Potential Model for Q q Godfrey-Isgur(1985) • Basic hypotheses of constituent quark model : • mesons : valence-quark configuration • dynamics described by a Hamiltonian: • relativized • confinement with running s • one gluon exchange dominates at short distance VQq Hconf + Hspin-spin(color-hyperfine) + Hspin-orbit(1-gluon-exch) + Hspin-orbit(Thomas precession) Inter-quark potential : Heavy Quark Symmetry:mQ   Q at rest (no chromomagnetic field, static source of chromoelectric field) , Q decouples from q (~hydrogen atom) dynamics of the q  meson properties separately conserved Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  7. spin-orbit spin-spin relativistic correction to HQ S : an expansion in powers of 1/mQ hyperfine splitting Predictions for cu and cs mesons based on Heavy Quark Symmetry • L = 1 Parity+ • jq= ³/2J =2 • J = 1 • jq= ½J = 1 • J = 0 • L = 0Parity - • jq = ½ J= 1 • J= 0 DSJ(2573) DS1(2536) D’S1 2.53GeV DS 02.48GeV D*2(2462) D1 (2421) D’1 2.44GeV D*0 2.40GeV Missing doublets till last summer D* (2007) D (1865) Ds* (2112) Ds (1968) • P-wave states withjq= ½ : expected to be broad (S-wave decays) •  difficult to identify experimentally(jq= ³/2states: narrow) • Also some predictions that: m(jq= ½ ) > m(jq= ³/2 ) Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  8. DSJ(2317) @ Belle • data sample: 87 fb-1 • e+e-  cc  Ds± 0 X (inclusively-produced) • Ds±  (K- K+)±p* (Ds ±0 ) > 3.5 GeV (p in CMS)(to reduce combinatorial background) DK threshold Fitted signal: 761  44 (stat)30 (syst) Events/5MeV 0/DS± sidebands M( DS 0) - M( DS ) GeV/c 2 M( DS 0 ) - M( DS ) GeV/c 2 Small peak : feed-down from DSJ(2457) M(DSJ(2317)) = 2317.2 ± 0.5(stat) ± 0.9(syst) MeV/c 2  < 4.6 MeV/c 2 (90% C.L.) Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  9. DSJ(2457) @ Belle • e+e-  cc  Ds*± 0 X ( Ds*± 0inclusively produced ) • Ds*±  Ds± Ds±  (K- K+)+ p* (Ds*±0 ) > 3.5 GeV Fitted signal: 12625(stat)12 (syst) Events/5MeV DS*± sideband M( D*S 0 ) - M( D*S ) GeV/c 2 M( D*S 0) - M( D*S ) GeV/c 2 M(DSJ(2457)) = 2456.5 ± 1.3(stat) ± 1.3(syst) MeV/c 2 Sideband-subtracted distribution  < 5.5 MeV/c 2 (90% C.L.) • „Peaking” background sources: • Signal feeddown from DSJ(2317)+random soft  • „Broken”DSJ(2457) signal : Ds* with „bad”  Test of nature ofDSJ : search for other decay modes Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  10. BR( DSJ(2457) DS± ) BR( DSJ(2457) DS± + - ) BR( DSJ(2457)  Ds*± 0 ) BR( DSJ(2457)  Ds*± 0 ) = 0.14 ± 0.04(stat) ± 0.02(syst) = 0.55 ± 0.13(stat) ± 0.08(syst) Decay modes ofDSJ DSJ(2457) DS± DSJ(2457) DS± + - DSJ(2317) region 59  11 152  18 DS1 (2536) Events/5MeV Events/3MeV M( DS ) - M( DS ) GeV/c 2 M( DS +-) - M( DS ) GeV/c 2 Dipion mode 1sttime observed (D’S1assumption: 0.62 ) (D’S1assumption: 0.16 ) Godfrey,Phys.Lett.B 568, 254 (2003) DSJ(2457) :JP 0+ ,0- favours JP= 1+ DSJ(2317) :favours JP= 0+ • No signal observed in: • DSJ(2457) Ds*± , Ds± 0 • DSJ(2317) Ds± , Ds*± , DS± + - From conservation of angular mom. and parity Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  11. - DSJ in cc continuum - summary • Belle observed DSJ(2317) DS±0 • and DSJ(2457)DS *±0 • inclusively produced in e+e- cc continuum • radiative and dipion decay modes of DSJ(2457)observed • the spin-parities 0+(DSJ(2317)) and 1+(DSJ(2457)) are favoured Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  12. DSJin B exclusive decays Motivations: • Assignments ofDSJ(2317)andDSJ(2457)being • orbitally excited cs mesons need confirmation • IfDSJ(2317)andDSJ(2457)arecs states : • can be observed inB  DDsJdecays • expected BF ~ 10-2 10-3 , quite large • States cs with j q= ½ “easier” produced in B decays than those with j q= ³/2 (HQET) • States produced in B decay can be polarized: from angular distributions  J P • In B decays : background reduction Tree type diagram processes Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  13. Method of full B reconstruction • Experimental conditions: e+e-  (4S)  BB m  (mB+mB) • For B decay to specific final state: B  f1 f2 …fn In(4S) frame Energy-Momentum conservation: Kinematical constraints are used • Kinematical Variables: • Energy difference • Beam-constrained • mass resolution improvement, background separation Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  14. J=2 hypothesis J=1 hypothesis B  DDsJdecays data sample: 115 fb-1 Signal extracted in E, Mbc and M(DSJ) Plot one of them with cuts on the others Reconstructed modes: B+  D0 DsJ+ B0  D- DsJ+ Both isospin related modes Events/10MeV E GeV M( DSJ ) GeV/c 2 DS±decay angle of in DSJ (2457) DS± (B  D DSJ ) Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  15. BR(DDSJ)xBR( DSJ(2457) DS± ) BR(DDSJ)xBR( DSJ(2457)  Ds*± 0 ) DSJin exclusive B decays – summary BR(BDDSJ)  BR(DSJ) comparison: 0.4 • first observation of DSJ states in B decayin Belle • no new DSJ decay modes in comparison to inclusive production • masses and widths consistent • DSJ (2457) angular analysis consistent with J=1 • measured BR’s do not exclude cs states assignments Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  16. New D**0 states expected decay modes: D- + , D*- + • data sample : 60 fb-1 • Dalitz analysis for : • B+ D- + + (~1100 signal events) andB+ D*- + + (~600 events) both with good S/B • unbinned likelihood fit performedwith signal density function: • S (M 12, M22 ) =Ai exp(ii ) BWi (M1 2, M2 2 ) + Aexp(i) 2  R(M2) • coherent sum of the amplitudes of D** states which can contribute and phase space term • convolution with experimental resolution Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  17. D**0mesons Dalitz plot projections with fit results Background M ( D min) GeV/c 2 M ( D min) GeV/c 2 Background M ( D* min) GeV/c 2 M ( D* min) GeV/c 2 First observation of D*0 and D1’0 , Belle Coll. Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków

  18. D**0- summary • Belle observed for the first timebroadD*0and D1’0states in B decays • (observed also by FOCUS, poor agreement in measured masses) • Identified as 0+and 1+orbitally excited cu doublet (withj q= ½) • Narrow 1+ , 2+ states: D10and D2* 0 also seen • (already observed by CLEO) • Masses and widths of four D** states were measured Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  19. Measured masses versus model predictions • In cu spectrum: masses of D, D*,D** consistent with model expectations • In cs case: masses of newDSJ (2317) andDSJ (2457) inconsistent Model expectation: M(cs ) – M(cu)  100 MeV Chiral symmetry broken chiral partners split off (states with opposite parity) DSJ (2317) andDSJ (2457) interpreted aschiral partners of DS andD*S ?  Nowak’s talk Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  20. Discovery of X(3872) • Belle data sample: 140 fb-1 • in B decay B ± K± + - J/J/  l+ l- For B signal extracted in E, Mbc M( + - l+ l- ) - M(l+ l- ) GeV M( + - l+ l - ) - M(l+ l - ) New state is not reflection from any known state new narrow charmonium-like state : X(3872)  J/ + - Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  21. X(3872) • Signal B ±  X(3872)K± extracted in E, Mbc and M( J/ + -) • Plot one of them with cut on the others • Simultaneous fit in 3 variables S = 35.7 6.8 (10 ) Events/5MeV Events/5MeV Events/15MeV Mbc GeV E GeV M ( J/ + - ) GeV MX = 3872.0 ± 0.6(stat) ± 0.5(syst) MeV X < 2.3 MeV(90% C.L.) • MX > M(D + D)open-charm decay possible, why so narrow ? • X produced in B decays: J cannot be high • Is it charmonium state? • One of the unobserved higher charmonium states 13DJ11D2 23P1 21P1? • (predicted masses @ X mass region) • MX  M(D0 + D*0) loosely boundedmolecular or hybrid state? Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  22.  (3Dc 2 c1)  2.  (3Dc 2  J/ + - )  (X(3872)   c1)  (X(3872)  J/ + - )  0.89 (90% C.L.)  (X(3872)   c2)  (X(3872)  J/ + - )  1.1(90% C.L.) Properties of X(3872) • Checking hypothesis that X(3872) is charmonium state •  radiative X decays should be observed (Eichten,Lane,Quigg) 3Dc 2 3Dc 3?X(3872)  c1,  c2 Theory: • B ± K±  c1c1(1P)  J/ Events/4MeV Events/8MeV M ( c1) GeV No signal in X(3872) region Mbc GeV • B ± K±  c2 c2(1P)  J/ Events/10MeV Events/5MeV M ( c2) GeV Mbc GeV 3Dc 2 &3Dc 3 ruled out Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  23.  ( 23P1  J/ )  ( 23P1  J/ + - ) Properties of X(3872) 23P1?X(3872)  J/ B ± K±  J/ Theory:  11keV / 0.3keV  30 Absence of X(3872) ’c1 (23P1 )ruled out M ( J/) - M (J/) GeV h’c (21P1 ) ? Prediction for 1+ :  1- cos2 (J/) J/ decay angle in X(3872) J/ + -(B  K X(3872) ) cos (J/) h’c1 (21P1 )ruled out Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  24. X(3872) – summary • New unexpected state X(3872) observed by Belle • (also seen at Fermilab in pp collisions and BaBar ) • Still no obvious charmonium assignment • Is it D0 D*0 molecule? MX = 3872.0 ± 0.6(stat) ± 0.5(syst) MeV X < 2.3 MeV(90% C.L.) Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  25. Summary • Many charm results from Belle. • Some of them • unexpected or/and inconsistentwith theoretical expectations. • B-Factory is a Charm Factory, too. • In aditionB decays are good and clear ground • to study charm spectroscopy. Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  26. Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  27. Dsmesons Dmesons L=1 L=1 Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

  28. Jolanta Brodzicka, INP Kraków , Belle Coll.

More Related