1 / 24

END-TO-END PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF THE PARIS IN-ORBIT DEMONSTRATOR OCEAN ALTIMETER

END-TO-END PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF THE PARIS IN-ORBIT DEMONSTRATOR OCEAN ALTIMETER. Salvatore D’Addio, Manuel Martin-Neira , Chris Buck Acknowledgment: Nicolas Floury, Roberto Pietro Cerdeira. TEC-ETP, Electrical Engineering Department European Space Agency. The PARIS Concept. PARIS =

riva
Download Presentation

END-TO-END PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF THE PARIS IN-ORBIT DEMONSTRATOR OCEAN ALTIMETER

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. END-TO-END PERFORMANCE ANALYSISOF THE PARIS IN-ORBIT DEMONSTRATOR OCEAN ALTIMETER Salvatore D’Addio,Manuel Martin-Neira, Chris Buck Acknowledgment: Nicolas Floury, Roberto Pietro Cerdeira TEC-ETP, Electrical Engineering Department European Space Agency

  2. The PARIS Concept PARIS = Passive Reflectometry and Interferometry System

  3. L5 L2 L1 40 MHz 40 MHz 40 MHz PARIS IOD Key Features • Direct Cross-correlation (DxR) • High gain beams for direct signals (D) • High gain beams for reflected signals (R) • Implicit use of full GNSS bandwidth (3x40 MHz) • Dual or Trial Frequency for precise estimation of ionospheric delay • Precise on-board delay calibration • Precise on-board amplitude calibration

  4. PARIS IoD L1 Power Waveform • GPS L1 Composite, Orbit Height: 500Km, Down-Looking Antenna Gain: 19dBi, Nadir Looking Geometry

  5. PARIS IoD Mission Summary Table

  6. Factors affecting altimetry performance

  7. G P Ionosphere i i s O Max Incidence Angle (1/2) The incidence angle plays an important role in the definition of critical parameters of the PARIS mission, such as:(a) Precision(b) Sampling and Coverage

  8. G P Ionosphere i i s O Max Incidence Angle (2/2) a) Altimetric performance degrades with incidence angleb) Ionospheric delay and antenna loss increase with incidence angle (a) (b) Antenna gain i The incidence angle should be restricted (<35).Coverage and sampling obtained by raising orbital height.

  9. Factors affecting altimetry performance

  10. Interferometric Processing SNR • Up/Down-looking Antenna Gain and Up/Down RX NF shall be such to ensure sufficient SNR • In PARIS IoD with interferometric processing, the final power waveform SNR is given as:

  11. Cross-Correlation Integration Time (Tc) Interferometric Processing Schematic Tc Ninc For a given target along track spatial resolution, e.g. 100Km, the coherent integration time and the incoherent averaging are inversely proportional:

  12. 1 chip delay Cross-Correlation Integration Time (Tc)

  13. Cross-Correlation Integration Time (Tc) Low Tc High Tc

  14. Cross-Correlation Integration Time (Tc) SNRSP TC

  15. Cross-Correlation Integration Time (Tc) • Analytical model for altimetry precision: • Tc shall be chosen such to have a sufficient SNR (e.g. 6dB) but cannot be increased further otherwise the altimetric precision is degraded because speckle is not averaged enough • However, Tc cannot be too low otherwise consecutive XC samples may be correlated and speckle would anyway not be averaged

  16. Factors affecting altimetry performance

  17. Waveform Retracking • The retracking has the objective of estimating the sea state parameters and the sea mean surface height by fitting a theoretical model to measured waveforms • Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) or on weighted least squares estimation has been extensively used in Conventional Radar Altimetry. • The MLE method estimates the parameters by determining which values maximize the probability of obtaining the recorded waveform shape in the presence of noise of a given statistical distribution. delay SWH

  18. Factors affecting altimetry performance

  19. The impact of Ionosphere • At L-band, the ionosphere is a major contributor to the propagation delay with • Multi-frequency observations allow to remove the ionospheric effect • However this is at the expense of a severe error amplification factor

  20. Possible Ionospheric Correction Method • Starting from range equation: • Multi-frequency observations are taken: • The ionospheric delays are retrieved with the following uncertainties: • A regression is performed over N samples of ionospheric delay • The smoothed ionospheric delay is used in the range equations, resulting in an improved error amplification factor

  21. G1 G2 P Ionosphere i i s1 s2 O Ionospheric Correction: Example 1/2 • What matters in mesoscale ocean altimetry is the difference between the ionospheric delay at two specular points Worst case is between nadir (i=0) and edge of swath (i=30)

  22. +12 m Derived from RA-2 real data Vertical Delay (m) 0 m +6 m Mesoscale Delay (m) 10 m +0.15 m Residual Delay (m) 200 km averaging of mesoscale delay applied 0.15 m Ionospheric Correction: Example 2/2

  23. PARIS IoD Preliminary Error Budget

  24. CONCLUSIONS • The PARIS altimeter can provide synoptic views of the ocean being thus well suited for mesoscale ocean altimetry • The interferometric processing between direct and reflected signals maximises the altimetric performance of the system • A demonstration mission should be able to achieve 18 cm total accuracy • An operational mission could be targeted for 5 cm • A particular application of PARIS IoD is the direct observation of tsunamis: • enhance our knowledge on tsunamis and complement early warning systems

More Related