1 / 8

Chatzilaou, Georgios , MD¹ A. John Kanellopoulos, MD² Professor NYU Medical School, NY

Laboratory evaluation of LASIk flap parameters created with 2 femtosecond lasers ASCRS, San Diego 2011. Chatzilaou, Georgios , MD¹ A. John Kanellopoulos, MD² Professor NYU Medical School, NY Director, Laservision.gr Institute, Athens, Greece. Financial Interest: None¹

river
Download Presentation

Chatzilaou, Georgios , MD¹ A. John Kanellopoulos, MD² Professor NYU Medical School, NY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Laboratory evaluation of LASIk flap parameters created with 2 femtosecond lasers ASCRS, San Diego 2011 Chatzilaou, Georgios, MD¹ A. John Kanellopoulos, MD² Professor NYU Medical School, NY Director, Laservision.gr Institute, Athens, Greece Financial Interest: None¹ Travel Reimbursement from Alcon, USA, Wavelight, Bausch and Lomb² Kanellopoulos, MD www.brilliantvision.com

  2. Purpose The laboratory evaluation of LASIK flap of a novel femtosecond laser versus our standard. FS 200 FS60 Kanellopoulos, MD www.brilliantvision.com

  3. FS60 Kanellopoulos, MD www.brilliantvision.com

  4. Wavelight FS200 Kanellopoulos, MD www.brilliantvision.com

  5. Methods 20 cadaver corneas, underwent LASIK flap creation Group A(10 corneas)with the Wavelight, Ultraflap 150kHz and Group B (10 corneas) with the INTRALASE FS60 Peri-operatively the flap diameter (FD), hinge length (HL) , total cornea and flap pachymetry(tP & fP), and flap creation interval were measured. Following tissue fixation, light microscopy sections were calculated for: peripheral, para-central and central thickness, intra-flap thickness variability (IFTV), diameter, hinge length and overall interface quality. Kanellopoulos, MD www.brilliantvision.com

  6. Results Group A: In mean values: fP: 110 microns +/- 5μm, IFTV: (+/- 5)μm. FD: 8.2 mm, HL: 3.55 mm +/- 0.34, creation time 15 seconds Group B: In mean values: fP: 115 +/-5μm(intended: 110), IFTV: (+/-5)μm, FD: 8.1 mm(intended: 8), HL: 3.25mm +/-0.24, creation time 17 seconds Kanellopoulos, MD www.brilliantvision.com

  7. Conclusions This study suggests highly reproducible flap parameters with both platforms. Further clinical studies may validate these data. Kanellopoulos, MD www.brilliantvision.com

  8. Thank you www.brilliantvision.com Kanellopoulos, MD www.brilliantvision.com

More Related