1 / 33

Energy saving through optimisation

ClimaCheck offers a non-invasive, high-precision efficiency monitoring platform for cooling systems. By analyzing key performance indicators, it identifies energy inefficiencies, ensuring system reliability and lowering maintenance costs. Improve energy usage with ClimaCheck's innovative technology.

rjackie
Download Presentation

Energy saving through optimisation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Energy saving through optimisation ClimaCheck CoolCheck Pty Ltd www.CoolCheck.co.za

  2. of the world’s energyis consumed by cooling systems 20% IIR (2002)

  3. About ClimaCheck ClimaCheck is performance and efficiency monitoring platform for cooling systems. Invented in 1986 in Sweden it uses a scientific process to identify energy inefficiencies and issues affecting reliability and maintenance costs. The technology was developed and refined and due to growing international demand, the company ClimaCheck was formed in 2004 to service markets worldwide. The process is totally non-invasive and uses raw temperature, pressure and energy data from any vapour compression system (cooling or heat pump) to measure the performance and efficiency. At its core, ClimaCheck provides plant owners and their operators high level key performance indicators and accountability for efficiency and reliability. Thousands of customers around the world trust ClimaCheck - from a mission-critical data centres in North America to a cooling system for a hotel in China of 300MW. CEO and inventor Mr Klas Berglöf

  4. What is it? How does it work? What is it used for? What does it do?

  5. Compared to other systems ?? What is the difference??

  6. How does it work? The law of the conservation of energy: “Energy cannot be destroyed” The law of the conservation of energy: “EnergyThe law of conservation of energy, a fundamental concept of physics, states that the total amount of energy remains constant in an isolated system. It implies that energy can neither be created nor destroyed, but can be change from one form to another”.

  7. How does it work? m m m m

  8. Pressure How does it work? Heat Capacity 3 2 P HP Enthalpy Difference P LP Cooling Capacity 1

  9. What does it do?

  10. What does it do? Nothing???? • Non-Invasive • Passive • “Read only”

  11. What does it do? Nothing???? • Non-Invasive • Passive • “Read only” • Energy-saving gadget • Set point “optimisation”

  12. Optimization start with measurements Measure Analyze Optimize Save ClimaCheck onsite- field measurements- 20 minutes to connect ClimaCheckonline– continuous monitoring - Early warning – energy reporting

  13. Climacheck Analyser:

  14. 300 MW Macao Hotel Casino Complex Combined Total Cooling Capacity:

  15. Performance vs Efficiency What is the difference? …as explained by Jeremy Clarkson…

  16. Monitoring Based Efficiency (MBE) Program

  17. Typical Process: Project Concept Technology A Optimum ● Efficiency Time

  18. Typical Process: Project Concept Technology A Optimum ● 1 Current Deviation B 2 ● Efficiency Time

  19. Typical Process: Project Concept Technology A Optimum ● 1 Current Deviation B 2 ● • 1Design and Installation: • Constraints (e.g. budget, time, environmental) • Information accuracy (e.g. client data, load data) • Load variability versus controls design and equipment operating envelope. • Incomplete or incorrect system commissioning. • 2Maintenance and Repair: • Setpoint adjustment. (e.g. priority given to performance over energy and/or reliability) • “Run to Fail” mentality: “if it ain't broke, don’t fix it”. • Component degradation over time (e.g. fouled heat exchangers). • Operational inefficiencies (night operation with unoccupied space) • Operator and service technician skill level. Efficiency Time

  20. Typical Process: Project Concept Technology A Optimum ● 1 Lost Efficiency Current Deviation B 2 ● • 1Design and Installation: • Constraints (e.g. budget, time, environmental) • Information accuracy (e.g. client data, load data) • Load variability versus controls design and equipment operating envelope. • Incomplete or incorrect system commissioning. • 2Maintenance and Repair: • Setpoint adjustment. (e.g. priority given to performance over energy and/or reliability) • “Run to Fail” mentality: “if it ain't broke, don’t fix it”. • Component degradation over time (e.g. fouled heat exchangers). • Operational inefficiencies (night operation with unoccupied space) • Operator and service technician skill level. Efficiency Time

  21. Typical Process: Project Concept Technology A V Optimum ● ɪ 1 B- baseline I-implementation V- validation Lost Efficiency B Current Deviation B 2 Phase 1 ● • 1Design and Installation: • Constraints (e.g. budget, time, environmental) • Information accuracy (e.g. client data, load data) • Load variability versus controls design and equipment operating envelope. • Incomplete or incorrect system commissioning. Phase 1:Operational Expenditure. E.G. re-commissioning, correction of identified inefficiencies such as poor control set-up (typical savings: 10% to 20%). • 2Maintenance and Repair: • Setpoint adjustment. (e.g. priority given to performance over energy and/or reliability) • “Run to Fail” mentality: “if it ain't broke, don’t fix it”. • Component degradation over time (e.g. fouled heat exchangers). • Operational inefficiencies (night operation with unoccupied space) • Operator and service technician skill level. Efficiency Time

  22. Typical Process: V Project Concept Technology ɪ A V B Optimum ● ɪ 1 B- baseline I-implementation V- validation Lost Efficiency B Current Deviation B 2 Phase 2 Phase 1 ● • 1Design and Installation: • Constraints (e.g. budget, time, environmental) • Information accuracy (e.g. client data, load data) • Load variability versus controls design and equipment operating envelope. • Incomplete or incorrect system commissioning. Phase 1:Operational Expenditure. E.G. re-commissioning, correction of identified inefficiencies such as poor control set-up (typical savings: 10% to 20%). • 2Maintenance and Repair: • Setpoint adjustment. (e.g. priority given to performance over energy and/or reliability) • “Run to Fail” mentality: “if it ain't broke, don’t fix it”. • Component degradation over time (e.g. fouled heat exchangers). • Operational inefficiencies (night operation with unoccupied space) • Operator and service technician skill level. Efficiency Phase 2:Capital Expenditure. E.G. installation of variable speed drives, “EC” fans and replacement of components beyond economic repair. Time

  23. Typical Process: M.B.E Program™ V // Project Concept Technology ɪ A V B Optimum ● ɪ 1 B- baseline I-implementation V- validation Lost Efficiency B Current Deviation B 2 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 1 ● // • 1Design and Installation: • Constraints (e.g. budget, time, environmental) • Information accuracy (e.g. client data, load data) • Load variability versus controls design and equipment operating envelope. • Incomplete or incorrect system commissioning. Phase 1:Operational Expenditure. E.G. re-commissioning, correction of identified inefficiencies such as poor control set-up (typical savings: 10% to 20%). • 2Maintenance and Repair: • Setpoint adjustment. (e.g. priority given to performance over energy and/or reliability) • “Run to Fail” mentality: “if it ain't broke, don’t fix it”. • Component degradation over time (e.g. fouled heat exchangers). • Operational inefficiencies (night operation with unoccupied space) • Operator and service technician skill level. Efficiency Phase 2:Capital Expenditure. E.G. installation of variable speed drives, “EC” fans and replacement of components beyond economic repair. Phase 3: Monitoring Based Efficiency Program™. E.G. on-going monitoring. Fault detection/prediction. Performance degradation over time. Energy team KPI feedback. Time

  24. Typical Process: M.B.E Program™ V // Project Concept Technology ɪ A 2 V B Optimum ● ɪ 1 B- baseline I-implementation V- validation Lost Efficiency B Current Deviation B 2 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 1 ● // • 1Design and Installation: • Constraints (e.g. budget, time, environmental) • Information accuracy (e.g. client data, load data) • Load variability versus controls design and equipment operating envelope. • Incomplete or incorrect system commissioning. Phase 1:Operational Expenditure. E.G. re-commissioning, correction of identified inefficiencies such as poor control set-up (typical savings: 10% to 20%). • 2Maintenance and Repair: • Setpoint adjustment. (e.g. priority given to performance over energy and/or reliability) • “Run to Fail” mentality: “if it ain't broke, don’t fix it”. • Component degradation over time (e.g. fouled heat exchangers). • Operational inefficiencies (night operation with unoccupied space) • Operator and service technician skill level. Efficiency Phase 2:Capital Expenditure. E.G. installation of variable speed drives, “EC” fans and replacement of components beyond economic repair. Phase 3: Monitoring Based Efficiency Program™. E.G. on-going monitoring. Fault detection/prediction. Performance degradation over time. Energy team KPI feedback. Time

  25. Gas Leak Detection Repair

  26. Hardware, Installation cost & Monthly subscription

More Related