1 / 24

Dialysis and Transplant Trends in ESRD Patients: USRDS Data Analysis

This analysis examines the trends in dialysis and transplant modalities among ESRD patients based on USRDS data from 1990 to 1998. It includes statistics on the number of patients, prevalence rates, and changes over time.

rjackson
Download Presentation

Dialysis and Transplant Trends in ESRD Patients: USRDS Data Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. December 31st point prevalent counts by modalityfigure 3.1 USRDS

  2. Number of dialysis patientsfigure 3.2, projected to 2010 USRDS

  3. Number of transplant patients & patients on the transplant waiting listfigure 3.3, projected to 2010 USRDS

  4. Modality at initiation, one year, & two yearsfigure 3.4, incident patients USRDS

  5. December 31st point prevalence: Hemodialysis, 1990figure 3.5, percent of total patients Percent of total patients USRDS

  6. December 31st point prevalence: Hemodialysis, 1994figure 3.5, percent of total patients Percent of total patients USRDS

  7. December 31st point prevalence: Hemodialysis, 1998figure 3.5, percent of total patients Percent of total patients USRDS

  8. December 31st point prevalence: Hemodialysis, percent change 1990-1998figure 3.5 Percent change USRDS

  9. December 31st point prevalence: Peritoneal dialysis, 1990figure 3.5, percent of total patients Percent of total patients USRDS

  10. December 31st point prevalence: Peritoneal dialysis, 1994figure 3.5, percent of total patients Percent of total patients USRDS

  11. December 31st point prevalence: Peritoneal dialysis, 1998figure 3.5, percent of total patients Percent of total patients USRDS

  12. December 31st point prevalence: Peritoneal dialysis, percent change 1990-1998figure 3.5 Percent change USRDS

  13. December 31st point prevalence: Transplant, 1990figure 3.5, percent of total patients Percent of total patients USRDS

  14. December 31st point prevalence: Transplant, 1994figure 3.5, percent of total patients Percent of total patients USRDS

  15. December 31st point prevalence: Transplant, 1998figure 3.5, percent of total patients Percent of total patients USRDS

  16. December 31st point prevalence: Transplant, percent change 1990-1998figure 3.5 Percent change USRDS

  17. Modality by age group & genderfigure 3.6, point prevalent patients on December 31st, 1998 USRDS

  18. Modality by race & genderfigure 3.6, point prevalent patients on December 31st, 1998 USRDS

  19. Modality by primary diagnosis & genderfigure 3.6, December 31st point prevalent patients, 1998 USRDS

  20. Modality at two years after first ESRD service, by age groupfigure 3.7, incident patients, 1994-1998 USRDS

  21. Percent distribution of patients by modality, age group, gender, race, & primary diagnosistable 3.1, December 31st point prevalent patients, 1998 USRDS

  22. Percent distribution of patients by treatment modality & networktable 3.2, December 31st point prevalent patients, 1996-1998 USRDS

  23. Percent of ESRD patients, by modality & ESRD durationfigure 3.8, December 31st point prevalent patients, 1998 USRDS

  24. Median age & modalityfigure 3.9, December 31st point prevalent patients, 1998 USRDS

More Related