220 likes | 233 Views
Learn about smoke shafts and pressurisation systems in the context of legislation, standards, performance, space requirements, and cost considerations. Find out which system is best for your building.
E N D
Colt International Ltd Smoke shafts -v- pressurisation Colt CPD Technical Seminar “People feel better in Colt conditions”| www.coltinfo.co.uk
A brief history of Colt • A private company founded in 1931 • I J O’Hea OBE (1897 - 1984) • 2014 Group turnover £146 million • Manufactures in the UK, Holland, Germany and China I J O’HeaColt Founder
Current UK Business Markets • Smoke Control • Solar Shading • Natural Ventilation • Louvre • Environmental Comfort Control
Smoke shafts –v- pressurisation Covering: • What do these systems do? • 2. Legal basis and standards: • Relative benefits, performance, space and cost • 4. Compensation for non-compliant layouts - Extended Travel Distances etc. • 5. Which system should I choose?
What do these systems do? • Protect stairs from smoke ingress • to aid safe evacuation • to aid safe fire fighting access • Reduce smoke ingress to lobbies or corridors adjoining stairs • Reduce risk of smoke spread via lifts • Protect fire fighting or evacuation lifts from smoke ingress • Design basis is always a single fire, not located in the stair, lobby or lift.
Legislation and standards • Legislation • In the UK the relevant legislation is Building Regulations and their associated guidance documents (Approved Document B in England and Wales and its equivalents in Scotland and Ireland). • In ADB: • Smoke control is recommended, directly or by reference to BS 5588 in: • residential escape stairs • all fire fighting stairs • AOV, natural shafts and pressure differential systems are largely treated as equivalents • mechanical shafts are not discussed (too new) • pressurisation can also be added to avoid discounting a stair or adding lobbies in commercial buildings
Legislation and standards Standards • In the UK we have: • BS 5588 (withdrawn) • BS 9991 • BS 9999 • BS 9991 and BS 9999 recommend a pressure differential system if a building has a floor more than 30m above ground level. • BS EN 12101-6 is the design standard for pressure differential systems
Legislation and standards BS EN 12101-6 • Sets requirements for 6 different classes of system. • Only 2 are commonly used: A & B. * = If pressurised
Legislation and standards Do mechanical smoke shafts provide depressurisation to BS EN 12101-6? • The standard was not written with this in mind • 50Pa? • 0.75m/s? • 100N? • Standby fans? • Conclusion: No, but it does match some requirements.
Pressure relief damper FIRE FLOOR Accommodation air release ventilator 2 m/s average velocity Lift door open Smoke detector Stairs First floor Ground floor Performance comparison
Space requirements (shafts) • A mechanical shaft system needs a single shaft, typically 0.5m2 to 1m2 cross section. • A pressurisation system needs: • A shaft for each area pressurised, typically 0.15m2 to 2.0m2 • Accommodation air release (another shaft?) Lobbies + + Stair Lobbies? Lift?
Fire Fighting Lobby negative Staircase Difficulties and issues – smoke shafts • Excess depressurisation • Large doors • Basement stair air inlet
Difficulties and issues - pressurisation • Large doors • Quality of building construction • Accommodation Air Release
Costs You get what you pay for. Pressurisation can provide the best protection but is the most expensive. A mechanical shaft is next best and next most expensive. A natural shaft is less expensive (but takes up more valuable space). AOV are low cost but provide the least good protection.
Non-ADB compliant buildings Extended travel distances in residential buildings
Non-ADB compliant buildings • Refurbishment / change of use • It’s not uncommon for older buildings to be unable to comply with current layout requirements (number of stairs, lobbies, etc). • Pressurisation? • Alternatives?
Which system do I choose? There’s no hard and fast answer, but this table might help guide you.
Ventilation In Car Parks Q&A Session… “People feel better in Colt conditions”| www.coltgroup.com