150 likes | 160 Views
SCOS97-NARSTO Upper-Air Meteorological Data Wind / RASS Profiler Processing / Objective QC. Bob Weber NOAA/ETL Boulder, Colorado Rip Off of Robert Baxter. Wind / RASS Profiler Data Collection June - October 1997. 26 Sites ARB VCAPCD SCAQM SDAPCD USAF STI NOAA SOP
E N D
SCOS97-NARSTOUpper-Air Meteorological DataWind / RASS ProfilerProcessing / Objective QC Bob WeberNOAA/ETLBoulder, Colorado Rip Off of Robert Baxter
Wind / RASS ProfilerData CollectionJune - October 1997 • 26 Sites ARB VCAPCD SCAQM SDAPCD USAF STI NOAA • SOP Real-Time Meteorological Products Quality Control Radar Doppler Spectral Moments Post Processing / Quality Control Radar Doppler Spectra Post Processing / Quality Control
On-Line Real-TimeMeteorological Products • First Look Winds and Temperatures • Radar Diagnostics • Incomplete Processing • Inadequate Quality Control • Unreliable for Critical Applications • Requires Post Analysis
Wind / RASS ProfilerOperations /Data Collection Radar Spectral Moments • Multiple Antenna Beams (3 - 5) • Time Sampling ~ 1 Minute • Spatial Sampling ~ 50-100 Meters • Doppler Velocity Spectral Signal Strength Spectral Signal Doppler Broadening
Wind / RASS ProfilerPost Processing /Quality Control Hourly / Daily • Contamination Rejection Noise, RFI, birds, ground clutter ... • Objective Quality Control Time-Height Consistency Hourly-Averaged Radar Spectral Moments Meteorological Products
Time-Height Consistency Objective Analysis Compare Data with Interpolated Value using neighbors in time and in height Quality Control Recognize Patterns of Continuous Data over time and over height (hourly, daily)
“Met 0” hourly QC > hourly average > daily QC > Correct Vertical Motion > Met Products “Met 1” * Correct Vertical Motion > hourly QC > hourly average > daily QC > Met Products Meteorological Noise, Radar Signal Contamination ? - choose higher objective QC value - choose neither - use other subjective criteria Objective / Subjective
Small-Scale Motion Precipitation, Convection, Waves, Fronts, … Complex Terrain Land-Sea, Mountains, Land Use, … Adverse Effects on Performance Wind/RASS Profiler Models Meteorological Noise
Pacific Standard Time Correction for Antenna Orientation Merged High and Low modes QC Codes Final Data Set
QC = 0 valid = 5 missing = 6 erroneous ( > 1 m/s or 10%, 1 Deg C ) = 7 suspect ( Objective QC ) = 8 invalid ( Objective QC ) = 9 no data QC Codes
1:00 Jim Pederson (ARB) Characterization of Upper Air Meteorology Conditions on IOP Days 1:15 Clinton MacDonald (STI) STI Analysis of 1997 Upper Air Met Data in SoCAB 1:30 Bob Weber (NOAA) Interpreting Data from a RWP/RASS Network 1:15 Bob Baxter (Parsons) Quality Assurance of Upper Air Met Data 2:20 to 2:30 Refreshment break for ten minutes 2:30 Clinton MacDonald (STI) Spatial and Temporal Observations of the Planetary Boundary Layer During Ozone Episodes in Southern California 2:50 Robert Bornstein (SJSU) The 4-7 August SCOS97 Ozone Episode: Comparisons between Observations and MM5 Simulations 3:15 to 3:20 Refreshment Break 3:20 Clinton MacDonald (STI) Moderator-Roundtable on Use of Aloft Meteorological Data: Lidar, Radar Wind Profiler Radio Acoustic Sounding Networks, Sodar Networks (60M) 4:20 Session III Concludes SCOS97-NARSTOData Analysis Conference13 February, 2001 Day 1-1:00 to 4:20 pmSession III: Upper Air & Other Meteorological Data
Measure Winds ???? 1.3-1.7 m/s Clear Air co-located wind profilers (Strauch et al., 1987) 2-4 m/s Precipitation co-located wind profilers (Wuertz et al., 1988) 2.5 m/s 2 years wind profiler / rawinsonde (Weber & Wuertz, 1989) 3.1 m/s co-located rawinsondes (Hoehne, 1980)