1 / 29

Detection & Identification of People & Animals by Exploration Robots

Craig Hahn April 13, 2009. Detection & Identification of People & Animals by Exploration Robots. Importance. robots must interact safely with humans and animals Image: http://depletedcranium.com/riman. Importance.

robbin
Download Presentation

Detection & Identification of People & Animals by Exploration Robots

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Craig Hahn April 13, 2009 Detection & Identification of People & Animals by Exploration Robots

  2. Importance • robots must interact safely with humans and animals • Image: http://depletedcranium.com/riman

  3. Importance • many “exploration” applications involve close interaction with humans (such as search-and-rescue operations) • people and animals are often the most dynamic part of a real-world environment • humans and animals must be identified quickly in all such situations

  4. Basic Methods • Stationary face detection using basic pattern recognition techniques • Image: http://www.motorauthority.com/wpcontent/uploads/odds_and_ends/2008/3/2/face_pic.jpg

  5. Facial Recognition • Easily done but of little use to mobile robots: • robot and target likely moving • faces are not always visible • Image: http://www-robotics.jpl.nasa.gov/roboticImages/img840-192-browse.jpg

  6. Basic Methods • Tracking using stereo vision cameras • problem: • distinguishing people from their surrounding environment, especially moving people

  7. Basic Methods • Use laser rangefinders to detect larger moving objects (not just looking at people’s faces) • But again you can’t always distinguish people from their surrounding environment using only laser rangefinders • possible problems: • people too close to other objects in environment (walls) • other objects (tables, chairs, etc.) mistaken for people

  8. Better Idea • Combine data from multiple sources • optical sensors • laser rangfinders • auditory systems • cameras • pattern recognition • sonar

  9. Kyoto University • Created a robot that combines facial recognition and auditory data • detect people by looking for faces • track them using stereo vision and sound source detection

  10. Autonomous Systems Lab Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne • Mobile robot Robox finds (moving) objects by detecting changes in a static environment with a laser rangefinder...

  11. Robox • …then checks such objects using visual cues to determine if they are people

  12. Department of Neuroinformatics and Cognitive Robotics Ilmenau Technical University • HOROS • laser-rangefinder • sonar system • omnidirectional camera

  13. sensory input from each sensing system

  14. - assigns each set of data a Gaussian probability distribution(,C) - mean  represents the position of the detection - covariance matrix C represents the uncertainty about the position

  15. reasonably successful in a real-world environment

  16. Advantages • HOROS doesn’t rely on just one sensing system • easy to add more sensing systems • just factor in another Gaussian distribution

  17. Centre for Applied Autonomous Sensor Systems Örebro University • Mobile robot identifies people in an indoor environment • laser rangefinder • camera • Learns a color model of a person • hair • skin • clothes • shoes

  18. laser rangefinder scans the environment • detects and tracks people • local minima correspond to the legs of a person

  19. image from camera is broken down into three parts

  20. color data is extracted from each part of the image • hue-saturation-value color model • color data is put into self-organizing maps (SOMs) • color model of a person is learned based on the best fit

  21. Assignment • Come up with another robotic system that combines three or more different sensing methods to identify humans or animals, and tell the difference between a human and a humanoid robot • explain: • why you chose the methods that you did • how each method can be used to identify humans or animals and differentiate humans from humanoid robots • how the data from each can be integrated together in a meaningful way • if applicable, identify specific equipment that could be used to implement your system

  22. Supply Companies • SICK laser rangefinders: • Image: http://www.pages.drexel.edu/~kws23/tutorials/sick/sickLMS200.jpg • widely used

  23. Omnidirectional Cameras • Nikon • Sony • Remote Reality • Image: http://blog.wired.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/07/01/hal9000_focus_jpg.jpg

  24. Other Important Companies • JAXY Optical Instrument Company (laser radar systems, sonar systems • Opnext, Inc. (laser rangefinders) • Instruments, Inc. (amplifiers, sonar systems, range sensors)

  25. Cutting-Edge Researchers • Ilmenau Technical University Department of Neuroinformatics and Cognitive Robotics • Örebro University Dept. of Technology, Centre for Applied Autonomous Sensor Systems • Kyoto University Department of Intelligence Science and Technology • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology LausanneAutonomous Systems Lab • Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg Social Robotics Laboratory, Institut für Informatik

  26. Future Improvements • Improvements are expected in: • identifying more dynamic objects (people and animals) • differentiating between multiple objects of the same type • differentiating between many different kinds of moving people and objects • being worked on at Albert-Ludwigs-University in Freiburg, Germany

  27. Other Improvements • identifying and classifying the behaviors of humans and animals • same accuracy of prediction and detection with: • less data • smaller periods of observation • can reach conclusions more quickly (less computational time)

  28. References • Sensor Fusion Using a Probabilistic Aggregation Scheme For People Detection and Tracking Department of Neuroinformatics and Cognitive Robotics Ilmenau Technical University <http://www.tu-ilmenau.de/fakia/fileadmin/template/startIA/neuroinformatik/publications/conferences_int/Martin-ECMR-05b.pdf> • Person Identification by Mobile Robots in Indoor Environments Centre for Applied Autonomous Sensor Systems Dept. of Technology, O¨ rebro University <ftp://aass.oru.se/pub/tdt/rose03.pdf> • Unsupervised Learning and Classification of Dynamic Objects Social Robotics Laboratory Institut für Informatik Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg <http://srl.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/papers/luberRSS08.pdf>

  29. References • Auditory fovea based speech separation and its application to dialog system Kyoto University, Department of Intelligence Science and Technology <http://thamakau.usc.edu/Proceedings/ICSLP%202002/ICSLP/PDF/AUTHOR/SL021615.PDF> • Robox at expo.02: A large scale installation of personal robots Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne,Autonomous Systems Lab <http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/97516>

More Related