300 likes | 323 Views
Meeting on Beam Impedance Calculations for HiLumi LHC, CERN, 29 October 2013. Preliminary Considerations on 800 MHz Cavity HOM-Free Design. M. Zobov, A. Gallo LNF INF, Frascati, Italy R. Bolgov, M. Gusarova, Ya. Shashkov, N. Sobenin MEPHI, Moscow, Russia.
E N D
Meeting on Beam Impedance Calculations for HiLumi LHC, CERN, 29 October 2013 Preliminary Considerations on 800 MHz Cavity HOM-Free Design M. Zobov, A. Gallo LNF INF, Frascati, Italy R. Bolgov, M. Gusarova, Ya. Shashkov, N. Sobenin MEPHI, Moscow, Russia
We do not know yet exact requirements coming from: • Beam dynamics • Geometrical constraints Why “Preliminary”? • Beam coupling impedance should be as small as possible • Not very high R/Q because of beam transients • Required volatge of 8 MV • Single cell design preferable What we know
Working point chosen r1 r2 rC rB lCELL/2 L.Ficcadenti et al., CERN
800 MHz Cavity Modes (Baseline design) R/Q of Cavity Modes
Cavity with damping couplers L.Ficcadenti et al., CERN
Since high R/Q is not required it is worthwhile to exploit the “single mode” cavity design: • Relatively Simple • No HOMs From KEKB Design Report
Geometry Optimization H111 (Electric Field) E110 (Electric Field) Drift Tube Radius: 85 mm Drift Tube Radius: 100 mm Drift Tube Radius: 85 mm
Fundamental Mode f = 800 MHz, R/Q0 = 53.33, Q0 = 1.91x1010
Cut-off E01 => 1.35 GHz
Fast rise Cut-off H11 => 1.03 GHz Slower decay
Multipacting simulations for the SC cavities – MultP-M code Possible multipacting for Ez in the range from 1.7-7 MV/m No stable trajectories are found
TE111 at 1068 MHz IElectric FieldI
Cavity with highly resistive insertion and notch filter Notch filter Insertion MEPHI + LNF INFN
HOM Suppression with Resistive Damping Rings w pos H111 Q0 = 1.57x1010 (w = 0 mm) E010 Q0 = 1.91x1010 (w = 0 mm) E011 Q0 = 1.57x1010 (w = 0 mm)
Considered Different Designs with Radial Lines Can be effective for HOM suppression! MEPHI + LNF INFN
To conclude: In order to proceed with the cavity design we need more precise indications on requirements imposed by both beam dynamics and by mechanical constraints (allowable space, beam pipe radius, required power, cryostat etc.)