60 likes | 100 Views
Establishing mechanisms to prioritize Technology Transfer cases for efficient resource allocation at CERN. Criteria derived from mission, goals, and KPI. Three priority levels and quantified criteria. Centralized priority list maintained.
E N D
TT case prioritizing Henning Huuse, Emir Sirage Mechanisms to organize operational work CERN, Technology Transfer
Context • Many cases - need for prioritizing • Milestone objective: Establish mechanisms for prioritizing of cases • Delivery: Defined mechanisms to prioritize TT case to be used to resource allocation CERN, Technology Transfer
Why? • Optimize efficiency in TT operation • Limited resources • Many existing cases • New cases • External requests • Consistent with new procedures CERN, Technology Transfer
Concept • Criteria should be derived from TT mission, goals and KPI • Establish three levels of priority • Assign priority to each case as a function of different quantified criteria • Centralized priority list kept by TTOP leader CERN, Technology Transfer
Criteria • Time to market • Window of opportunity - market development • Perceived execution time to first results - quick returns • Visibility of the technology • Academic • Commercial • Commercial potential – revenue prospect • Dissemination prospect • Socioeconomic impact • External requests • Ongoing cases – pending actions and interactions • Political factors • Case idle time • Achieved results CERN, Technology Transfer
Priority levels • Priority 1 • Urgent and important • Maximum 5 cases • Priority 2 • Important • New cases enter here • Priority 3 • Not urgent or important CERN, Technology Transfer